Communications
[2] L. Stryer, Biochemistry, 3rd ed., W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, 1988,
Chs. 2, 21, 24; pp. 15–42, 495–515, 575–600.
[4] Peptide Therapeutics Market – Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share,
[6] A. T. Bockus, C. M. McEwen, R. S. Lokey, Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2013, 13,
821–836.
[7] M. G. Akimov, I. V. Nazimov, N. M. Gretskaya, V. I. Deigin, V. V. Bezuglov,
Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2010, 36, 753–759.
[9] V. Deigin (Manus Pharmaceuticals Ltd.), US Pat. No. US8637521 B2,
2006.
test peptide or control solution were administered to recipient
i.p. or orally at doses of 10 or 100 mgkgÀ1. Irradiation of bone
marrow cells leads to depletion of colony numbers, and pep-
tide treatment is intended to counteract the damage. The re-
sults obtained (Figure 8 and Table S3 in the Supporting Infor-
mation) clearly demonstrate that linear peptides thymogen
1 and stemokin 2, being highly active under systemic applica-
tion, show no activity in the post-irradiation cell restoration
test upon oral administration. In contrast, cyclic peptides 3, 6,
and 7 show high activity under both routes of administration,
commensurate with the above-mentioned activity of 1 and 2.
The Leu-containing analogue 5 showed some tendency in
activity at systemic application, and the Val-containing ana-
logue 4 showed none. Generally, the behavior of analogues 4–
6 in the two test systems provides another example of poor
predictability of structure–function relationships in complex
biological systems.
[10] G. M. Yakovlev, V. G. Morozov, V. Kh. Khavinson, V. I. Deigin, A. M. Korot-
kov, Pat. No. RF1582393, 1987.
[11] V. G. Morozov, V. Kh. Khavinson, V. V. Malinin, Peptide Thymomimetics,
Nauka, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2000.
[12] V. Kh. Khavinson, Neuroendocrinol. Lett. 2002, 23, 11–144.
[13] V. I. Deigin, T. N. Semenets, I. A. Zamulaeva, Ya. V. Maliutina, E. I. Seliva-
[14] T. N. Semenets, O. V. Semina, J. E. Vinogradova, V. I. Deigin, A. M. Pover-
enny, Immunology 2000, 6, 20–22.
[15] V. I. Deigin, A. S. Saenko, Yu. A. Semin, Radiat. Biol. Radioecol. 2011, 51,
530–535.
[16] O. V. Semina, T. N. Semenets, V. I. Deigin, A. M. Korotkov, A. M. Poveren-
ny, Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 1993, 9, 298–299.
As a result of the present work, the first orally active hemos-
timulatory peptides have been prepared on the basis of our
original concept. Successful application of the concept paves
the way for further application of the Glu-Trp family of pep-
tides in the area of analogues with hemo- and immunosup-
pressive activity. Another aspect of future work will concern
the design and development of orally active chimeric peptide
drugs in which the 2,5-diketopiperazine moiety chemically con-
nects the peptide portion with another pharmacophore, not
necessarily of peptide nature. These studies are currently un-
derway in our laboratory.
[18] V. Deigin, A. Poverenny, O. Semina, T. Semenets, Proceedings of Ameri-
can Peptide Symposia 2002, 6, 626–627.
[19] O. V. Semina, T. N. Semenets, V. I. Deigin, A. M. Korotkov, A. M. Poveren-
ny, Radiat. Biol. Radioecol 1993, 33, 808–811.
Acknowledgements
[20] Synthesis of Peptides and Peptidomimetics, Vol. E22a (Eds.: M Goodman,
A Felix, L Moroder, C Toniolo), Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 2002.
[22] G. P. Slater, Chem. Ind. 1969, 32, 1092.
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation
(project no. 14-50-00131) for IBCH RAS.
Keywords: piperazine-2,5-diones
peptidomimetics · synthetic peptides
·
hematopoiesis
·
Received: March 18, 2016
Revised: June 2, 2016
Published online on && &&, 0000
&
ChemMedChem 2016, 11, 1 – 5
4
ꢁ 2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!