10.1002/anie.201906130
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
Each of the examples in Scheme 4 feature reactions in which both
reaction partners contain two or more heteroatom substituents.
Noteworthy examples include amide coupling with saxagliptin, as
the resulting amide product contains 10 unique heteroatoms (35).
Formation of a dipeptide was achieved via the coupling of a tBu-
ester amino acid with an N-Boc-protected amino alcohol (38).
Polyethylene glycols (PEGs) are a prominent class of b-
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this project was provided by a grant from the
National Institutes of Health (R01-GM100143). This material is
based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation
Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-
1747503 (PEP). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or
recommendations expressed in this material are those of the
author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National
Science Foundation. Support was also provided by the Graduate
School and the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and
Graduate Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison with
funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation. NMR
instrumentation was supported by the NSF (CHE-1048642) and
by a generous gift from Paul J. and Margaret M. Bender. Mass
spectrometry instrumentation was supported by the NIH (1S10
OD020022-1).
heteroatom-substituted
alcohols,
and
PEGylation
of
pharmaceuticals can lead to enhanced pharmacological
properties by changing their solubility or membrane
permeability.[22,23] The Cu/ABNO-catalyzed method proved to be
effective in coupling mPEG–OH units with benazepril F,[ 24 ]
affording excellent product yields in both cases (40, 41).
The results described herein demonstrate that the Cu/ABNO
catalyst system exhibits broad scope and synthetic utility for the
oxidative coupling of alcohols and amines to form amides. The
reactions take advantage of the unique activating properties of b-
heteroatom-substituted alcohols to afford pharmaceutically
important a-substituted amides. The reaction yields, even with
complex substrates, are commonly >90%, suggesting that these
methods represent an important complement to traditional amide
coupling methods. For example, the efficiency and
chemoselectivity evident in the trifluoroacetylation of primary
amines suggests that this method offers an appealing alternative
to methods that use trifluoroacetic anhydride. More broadly, these
methods could find extensive use in medicinal chemistry,
enabling rapid diversification of simple building blocks or core
structures containing a primary alcohol or amine. And, the lack of
requirement for a stoichiometric coupling reagent offers potential
advantages in large scale amide coupling reactions.
Conflict of interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: amide coupling • copper • homogeneous catalysis •
aerobic oxidation • cross-coupling
[1] (a) J. S. Carey; D. Laffan; C. Thomson; M. T. Williams, Org. Biomol. Chem.
2006, 4, 2337–2347. (b) S. D. Roughley; A. M. Jordan, J. Med. Chem.
2011, 54, 3451–3479. (c) D. G. Brown; J. Boström, J. Med. Chem. 2016,
59, 4443–4458.
Lett. 2013, 54, 4922–4925. (k) N. Ortega; C. Richter; F. Glorius, Org. Lett.
2013, 15, 1776–1779 (l) X. Bantreil; N. Kanfar; N. Gehin; E. Golliard; P.
Ohlmann; J. Martinez; F. Lamaty, Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 5093–5099. (m)
X. Xie; H. V. Huynh, ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 4143–4151. (n) B. Kang; S. H.
Hong, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 834–840. (o) S. L. Zultanski; J. Zhao;
S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6416–6419. (p) S.
Selvamurugan; R. Ramachandran; G. Prakash; P. Viswanathamurthi; J.
G. Malecki; A. Endo, J. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 803, 119–127. (q) E. M.
Lane; K. B. Uttley; N. Hazari; W. Bernskoetter, Organometallics 2017, 36,
2020–2025. (r) A. Kumar; N. A. Espinosa-Jalapa; G. Leitus; Y. Diskin-
Posner; L. Avram; D. Milstein, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 14992–
14996; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 15188–15192.
[2] (a) E. Valeur; M. Bradley, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 606–631. (b) H.
Lundberg; F. Tinnis; H. Adolfsson, Synlett 2012, 23, 2201–2204. (c) H.
Lundberg; F. Tinnis; H. Adolfsson, Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 3822–3826.
(d) R. M. Lanigan; P. Starkov; T. D. Sheppard, J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78,
4512–4523. (e) B. Basavaprabhu; K. Muniyappa; N. R. Panguluri; P.
Veladi; V. V. Sureshbabu, New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 7746–7749.
[3] (a) C. A. G. N. Montalbetti; V. Falque, Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 10827–
10852. (b) K. Ekoue-Kovi; C. Wolf, Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 6302–6315.
(c) V. R. Pattabiraman; J. W. Bode, Nature 2011, 480, 471–479 (d) C. L.
Allen; J. M. J. Williams, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3405–3415. (e) A. M.
Whittaker; V. M. Dong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1312–1315 (f) H.
Miyamura; H. Min; J.-F. Soulé; S. Kobayashi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015,
54, 7564–7567; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 7674–7677. (g) T. T. Nguyen;
K. L. Hull, ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 8214–8218. (h) R. M. de Figueiredo; J.-S.
Suppo; J.-M. Campagne, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 12029–12122. (i) J. R.
Dunetz; J. Magano; G. Weisenburger, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016, 20,
140–177.
[5] (a) E. M. Huber; M. Basler; R. Schwab; W. Heinemeyer; C. J. Kirk; M.
Groettrup; M. Groll, Cell 2012, 148, 727–738. (b) W. L. Holland; P. E.
Scherer, Science 2013, 342, 1460–1461. (c) M. Golden; N. P. R. Mon; V.
Nandialath; A. Muthusamy; R. Neppalli; R. H. Vasudev (Astra Zeneca),
WO 2016124722, 2016.
[6] For reviews, see: (a) B. L. Ryland; S. S. Stahl, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2014, 53, 8824–8838; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 8968–8983 (b) Y. Seki;
K. Oisaki; M. Kanai, Tet. Lett. 2014, 55, 3738–3746. (c) Q. Cao; L. M.
Dornan; L. Rogan; N. L. Hughes; M. J. Muldoon, Chem. Commun. 2014,
50, 4524 (d) K. C. Miles; S. S. Stahl, Aldrichimica Acta 2015, 48, 8–10.
[7] For leading references, see: (a) P. Gamez; I. W. C. E. Arends; R. A.
Sheldon; J. Reedijk, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 805–811 (b) E. T. T.
Kumpulainen, A. M. P. Koskinen, Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 10901–10911.
(c) J. M. Hoover; S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16901–16910.
(d) J. E. Steves; S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 15742–15745.
(e) Y. Sasano; S. Nagasawa; M. Yamazaki; M. Shibuya; J. Park; Y.
Iwabuchi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 3236–3240.
[4] (a) C. Gunanathan; Y. Ben-David; D. Milstein, Science 2007, 317, 790–
792. (b) L. U. Nordstrøm; H. Vogt; R. Madsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 17672–17673. (c) J. H. Dam; G. Osztrovszky; L. U. Nordstrøm; R.
Madsen, Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6820–6827. (d) Y. Zhang; C. Chen; S.
C. Ghosh; Y. Li; S. H. Hong, Organometallics 2010, 29, 1374–1378. (e) A.
Prades; E. Peris; M. Albrecht, Organometallics 2011, 30, 1162–1167. (f)
N. D. Schley; G. E. Dobereiner; R. H. Crabtree, Organometallics 2011, 30,
4174–4179. (g) C. Chen; Y. Zhang; S. H. Hong, J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76,
10005–10010. (h) J.-F. Soulé; H. Miyamura; S. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 18550–18553. (i) X. Bantreil; C. Fleith; J. Martinez; F.
Lamaty, ChemCatChem 2012, 4, 1922–1925. (j) S. C. Ghosh; J. S. Y.
Ngiam; A. M. Seayad; D. T. Tuan; C. W. Johannes; A. Chen, Tetrahedron
[8] (a) J. M. Hoover; B. L. Ryland; S. S. Stahl, ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 2599–
2605. (b) J. M. Hoover; B. L. Ryland; S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013,
135, 2357–2367.
4
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.