J. A. Grzyb, R. A. Batey / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 5279–5282
5281
nols, thiols, and carboxylic acids.7–10 To achieve the goal of the cur-
rent study, a single set of reaction and purification conditions were
required for the reaction of 3 with different classes of nucleophiles,
using a parallel solution-phase synthesis approach. We were par-
ticularly interested in establishing a protocol that would not re-
quire the use of any type of chromatographic purification, but
which would give the products in high yield and purity.
Carbamoylimidazolium salts 3a–d were chosen as representa-
tive examples for the purpose of library synthesis, and were syn-
thesized using the previously reported protocol (Scheme 1). Thus,
refluxing the secondary amines 1 with N,N0-carbonyldiimidazole
(CDI) (1.1 equiv) in THF afforded carbamoylimidazoles 2, which
were isolated in excellent yields and purity after only an aqueous
work-up. Reaction of 2 with iodomethane (4.0 equiv) in acetoni-
trile at room temperature for 24 h gave the corresponding carba-
moylimidazolium salts 3a–d, which were isolated by simple
evaporation in vacuo of the volatile reagents and solvents.12 Fur-
ther purification of the salts was not necessary, although salts
3a–d can be recrystallized if required.
with carbamoylimidazolium salts using a common set of reaction
conditions and a straightforward liquid–liquid extraction purifica-
tion protocol. The strategy allows for diversification of the linking
functional group to be incorporated as a key element in the design
of a single library, using identical coupling conditions. It is antici-
pated that this approach will find utility for the synthesis of
other directed libraries. Further studies on the use of carbamoylim-
idazolium salts and related chemistry will be reported in due
course.
Acknowledgments
We thank Chemtura, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Re-
search Council (NSERC) of Canada, and the Environmental Science
and Technology Alliance of Canada for financial support. We thank
Dr. A. B. Young for MS analyses.
References and notes
1. For reviews, see: (a) Fergus, S.; Bender, A.; Spring, D. R. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2005, 9, 304–309; (b) Fitzgerald, S. H.; Sabat, M.; Geysen, H. M. J. Comb. Chem.
2007, 9, 724–734; (c) Martin, E. J.; Critchlow, R. E. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 32–
45; (d) Lee, M.-L.; Schneider, G. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 284–289.
2. The key coupling steps in which diversification is achieved often involve the
formation of one bond, as in the case of amide bond formation or metal
catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, but may involve multiple bond formations,
as in cycloaddition reactions, such as triazole formation via Huisgen 1,3-dipolar
cycloadditions, see: (a) Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021; (b) Bock, V. D.; Hiemstra, H.; van Maarseveen, J. H.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 51–68; (c) Angell, Y. L.; Burgess, K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007,
36, 1674–1689.
O
O
I
I
N
N
N
N
N
N
N Me
N Me
O
3a
O
3b
I
O
I
N Me
N
N
O
N Me
3c
3d
O
3. Greater complexity is also available through the use of domino reactions,
‘diversity oriented synthesis’ (DOS) approaches, and through the use of
sequenced diversification reactions, such as for Houghten’s ‘libraries from
libraries’ approach. For reviews, see: (a) Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis;
Tietze, L. F., Brasche, G., Gericke, K. M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005; (b)
Burke, M. D.; Schreiber, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2004, 43, 46–58; (c)
Nefzi, A.; Ostresh, J. M.; Yu, J.; Houghten, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3603–
3609.
4. Multi-component coupling reactions are also widely employed as complexity
generating reactions, see: Multicomponent Reactions; Zhu, J., Bienayme, H., Eds.;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006.
5. For a discussion of functional group diversification achieved through different
cleavage strategies of linker units in solid-supported synthesis, see: Scott, P. J.
H.; Steel, P. G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 2251–2268.
With the imidazolium salts 3a–d in hand, we next set about
developing a common set of reaction conditions suitable for urea,
amide, carbamate, and thiocarbamate formation.
screening studies were run to establish the effect of solvents, base
additives, reaction time, and stoichiometry.7 Dichloromethane was
found to be an optimal solvent, and the use of triethylamine as a
base resulted in complete reaction conversion within 16 h at room
temperature. A small excess of the imidazolium salts 3 was re-
quired to push reactions to completion.
A series of
With optimized conditions established, a solution-phase paral-
lel synthesis of a small 48-member demonstration library of com-
pounds was completed using the coupling of 3a–d with 3 different
thiols, 3 amines, 3 phenols, and 3 carboxylic acids (Table 1). The
4 ꢀ 12 library comprised four different types of functional group
linkers; thiocarbamates from reaction with thiols, ureas from reac-
tion with amines, carbamates from reaction with phenols, and
amides from reaction with carboxylic acids. The library was syn-
thesized using a 12-tube Radleys carousel on a 0.4 mmol scale,
using a slight excess of the salts 3 (1.25 equiv) with triethylamine
(1.0 equiv).13,14 Since the by-products from the reactions as well as
the unreacted starting materials are water soluble, or could be
made water-soluble by an acid–base reaction, a liquid–liquid
extraction procedure using a sequential acidic (1 N HCl) and basic
wash (1 N NaOH) was used for product purification. The extrac-
tions were carried out using a reservoir (syringe barrel) containing
6. For example, in a recent library synthesis using a consecutive alkylation/Pd
catalyzed functionalization approach using parallel Suzuki-Miyaura,
Sonogashira, Stille and Heck reactions, the reaction conditions had to be
tuned appropriately for each reaction. See: Coelho, A.; Sotelo, E. J. Comb. Chem.
2005, 7, 526–529.
7. (a) Batey, R. A.; Santhakumar, V.; Yoshina-Ishii, C.; Taylor, S. D. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 6267–6270; (b) Batey, R. A.; Yoshina-Ishii, C.; Taylor, S. D.;
Santhakumar, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2669–2672; (c) Batey, R. A.; Shen,
M.; Santhakumar, V.; Yoshina-Ishii, C. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening
2002, 5, 219–232; (d) Grzyb, J. A.; Batey, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7485–
7488; (e) Grzyb, J. A.; Shen, M.; Yoshina-Ishii, C.; Chi, W.; Brown, R. S.; Batey, R.
A. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7153–7175.
8. For selected recent applications of the use of carbamoylimidazolium salts, see:
(a) Clayden, J.; Turner, H.; Pickworth, M.; Adler, T. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3147–
3150; (b) Bridgeman, E.; Cavill, J. L.; Schofield, D. J.; Wilkins, D. S.; Tomkinson,
N. C. O. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 8521–8524; (c) Williams, P. D.; Wai, J. S.;
Embrey, M. W.; Staas, D. D.; Zhuang, L.; Langford, H. M. Preparation of 2H-
Pyrazino[1,2-c]Pyrimidines as HIV Integrase Inhibitors, PCT Int. Appl., 2005, WO
2005092099 A1 20051006.; (d) Coleman, P. J.; Cox, C. D.; Garbaccio, R. M.;
Hartman, G. D. Preparation of Dihydropyrrolecarboxamides as Mitotic Kinesin
Inhibitors for Treating Cancer, PCT Int. Appl., 2005, WO 2005019206 A1
20050303; (e) Cumming, J. N.; Huang, Y.; Li, G.; Iserloh, U.; Stamford, A.;
Strickland, C.; Voigt, J. H.; Wu, Y.; Pan, J.; Guo, T.; Hobbs, D. W.; Le, T. X. H.;
Lowrie, J. F. Preparation of Cyclic Amine BACE-1 Inhibitors Having a Heterocyclic
Substituent, PCT Int. Appl., 2005, WO 2005014540 A1 20050217.; (f) Lau, J. F.;
Jeppesen, C. B.; Rimvall, K.; Hohlweg, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 5303–
5308; (g) Jenkins, T. J.; Guan, B.; Dai, M.; Li, G.; Lightburn, T. E.; Huang, S.;
Freeze, B. S.; Burdi, D. F.; Jacutin-Porte, S.; Bennett, R.; Chen, W.; Minor, C.;
Ghosh, S.; Blackburn, C.; Gigstad, K. M.; Jones, M.; Kolbeck, R.; Yin, W.; Smith,
S.; Cardillo, D.; Ocain, T. D.; Harriman, G. C. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 566–584; (h)
Edlin, C. D.; Holman, S.; Jones, P. S.; Keeling, S. E.; Lindvall, M. K.; Mitchell, C. J.;
Trivedi, N. Preparation of 1H-Pyrazolo[3,4-b]Pyridines as Phosphodiesterase,
Especially PDE4B, Inhibitors for Treatment of Inflammatory and/or Allergic
Diseases, PCT Int. Appl., 2007, WO 2007036733 A1 20070405; (i) Ebdrup, S.;
Refsgaard, H. H. F.; Fledelius, C.; Jacobsen, C. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 5449–5456.
a hydrophobic membrane (two 20 lm polyethylene frits) that al-
lows only the passage of the denser organic phase (i.e., the dichlo-
romethane layer).15,16 After concentration in vacuo the products 5
could be obtained in excellent yields and purities. Purities were
determined by 1H NMR, and for those compounds possessing a
good chromophore by HPLC using a UV254 detector. In all cases
the purity as determined by NMR was P95%, and by HPLC was
P92%.
In conclusion, a solution-phase parallel synthesis of a small fo-
cused library of thioureas, ureas, carbamates, and amides has been
achieved through the coupling of different classes of nucleophiles