Chakraborti et al.
JOCArticle
an alternative to the diazoalkane protocol.7 However, the
lack of commercial availability of different dialkyl sulfates
limits their application to methyl/ethyl esters and indicates
the necessity for better and general alkylating agents.
and primary alcohols as substrates. The carboxylic acid
activation strategies15 require stoichiometric amounts of addi-
tional reagent such as tetramethylfluoroformamidinium hex-
afluorophosphate (TFFH) (not available commercially and
requires special efforts for preparation) or di-tert-butyl dicar-
bonate and toxic 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP)16 as the
catalyst. The Lewis acid catalyzed decarboxylative esterifica-
tion of carboxylic acids with dialkyl dicarbonates17 is not atom
economical and requires costly reagents. Therefore, the search
remains for a general and practical esterification procedure.18
We were influenced by the awareness of the use of solid
acids19 and chemical processes on solid surfaces20 as envir-
onmentally friendly approaches in organic synthesis. In
pursuit of designing/choosing a suitable catalyst system, we
realized that the usual homogeneous catalysts are often
destroyed during product isolation and this “once through”
utilization of the catalyst can result in unacceptably high
manufacturing costs. A heterogeneous catalyst system, on
the other hand, may be easily recovered by filtration and
recycled. This has advantages in that the extra processing
steps are eliminated and spent catalyst disposal is minimized.
To this endeavor we discovered two novel catalyst systems,
e.g., perchloric acid immobilized on silica gel (HClO4-SiO2)
and fluoroboric acid immobilized on silica gel (HBF4-SiO2),21
that were found to be highly effective for various organic
transformations.21,22 These catalyst systems (HClO4-SiO2
and HBF4-SiO2) are/were not commercially available and
were invented by Chakraborti and Gulhane and used for the
first time for organic synthesis.21 We were delighted to observe
Dimethyl carbonate (DMC) is considered a safer methylat-
ing reagent8 and has been used for reaction with nucleophiles
such as phenols, primary amines, sulfones, thiols, and active
methylene derivatives.9 But the lack of commercial availability
of a variety of dilakyl carbonates is a disadvantage for their
general use. Although DMC can be considered an environ-
mentally benign compound, the reported reaction conditions
for methylation with DMC are not apparently green as these
require high temperature (>160 °C) that implies an autogenic
pressure (>3 bar). The reactions are carried out either under
continuous flow or batch reactors in the presence of base
catalysts. The limited reports on carboxyl-O-methylation with
DMC involve the treatment in the presence of NaY faujasite at
165 °C in a stainless-steel autoclave for 13-20 h,10 heating in
the presence of stoichiometric amounts of DBU under reflux,11
or circulating the reaction mixture in a microwave reactor
preheated to 160 °C at 20 bar under microwave irradiation.12
The condensation of a carboxylic acid with alcohol
appears to be the most straightforward and general route
for the synthesis of esters. However, the difficulty arises due
to the reversibility of the reaction. Therefore, it necessitates
the need to use excess amounts of one of the reactants over
the other or the continuous removal of the water formed to
drive the reaction equilibrium toward the product (ester).
The former process is not preferred on the grounds of “atom
economy”.13 Water removal by azeotropic distillation or by
the use of dehydrating agents does not make the desired
conversion/yield easy to achieve. An ideal esterification
process should be the one that offers quantitative conver-
sion/yield from molar equivalents (1:1 ratio) of the car-
boxylic acid and the alcohol and avoids the necessity of a
dehydration process. Thus, efforts have been directed
toward esterification with 1:1 ratio of carboxylic acid and
the alcohol.14 However, some of these methodologies still
require heating (azeotropic water removal) in solvents such
as o-xylene, 1,3,5-mesitylene, or toluene14a-c and dehydrat-
ing agents.14a,d The other esterification procedure involving
heating in Brønsted acidic ionic liquids as solvent14e,f or
using surfactant-combined14g/Brønsted acidic ionic
liquid14h catalysts is limited to a few simple carboxylic acids
that soon after the original work on its invention Chakraborti’s
21a,c
novel catalyst system HClO4-SiO2
caught the attention
of other researchers globally who started applying HClO4-
SiO2 as catalyst for a large variety of organic reactions/
syntheses (e.g., amidoalkylation of naphthols, construction
of heterocyclic scaffolds, homoallyl amines, R-bromo and
β-amino/sulfido carbonyl compounds, trisubstituted alkenes,
acylals, carbohydrates, etc.).23 We now report HClO4-SiO2 as
an extremely efficient and reusable catalyst system for a
general and practical esterification process by direct condensa-
tion of carboxylic acids with alcohols in atom economical
fashion.24
Results and Discussion
Various protic acids adsorbed on solid supports were
studied for their efficiency toward the esterification of
ꢀ
(7) Chakraborti, A. K.; Basak (nee Nandi), A.; Grover, V. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 8014 and the references cited therein.
(8) Selva, M.; Perosa, A. Green Chem. 2008, 10, 457.
(9) Tundo, P.; Selva, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 706.
(10) Selva, M.; Tundo, P. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1464.
(16) Intravenous LD50 (rat) 56 mg kg-1: Sweet, D. V. Registry of Toxic
Effects of Chemical Substances, 1985-86; U.S. Govt. Printing Office:
Washington, D.C., 1988; p 3336.
ꢁ
€
(11) Shieh, W.-C.; Dell, S.; Repic, O. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2188.
(17) Goossen, L.; Dohring, A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 943.
ꢁ
(12) Shieh, W.-C.; Dell, S.; Repic, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5607.
(18) Otera, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2044.
(19) (a) Wilson, K.; Clark, J. H. Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 1313.
(b) Sartori, G.; Ballini, R.; Bigi, F.; Bosica, G.; Maggi, R.; Righi, P. Chem.
Rev. 2004, 104, 199.
(13) (a) Trost, B. M. Science 1991, 254, 1471. (b) Trost, B. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 259.
(14) (a) Ishihara, K.; Ohara, S.; Yamamoto, H. Science 2000, 290, 1140.
(b) Wakasugi, K.; Misaki, T.; Yamada, K.; Tanabe, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 5249. (c) Mantri, K.; Komura, K.; Sugi, Y. Green Chem. 2005, 7,
677. (d) Bartoli, G.; Boeglin, J.; Bosco, M.; Locatelli, M.; Massaccesi, M.;
Melchiorre, P.; Sambri, L. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 33 and references cited
therein. (e) Zhu, H.-P.; Yang, F.; Tang, J.; He, M.-Y. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 38.
(f) Cole, A. C.; Jensen, J. L.; Ntai, I.; Tran, K. L. T.; Weaver, K. J.; Forbes, D. C.,
Jr.; Davis, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5962. (g) Gang, L.; Xinzong, L.;
Eli, W. New J. Chem. 2007, 71, 348. (h) Zhang, H.; Xu, F.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, G.;
Wang, C. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 1208.
(20) Ertl, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3524.
(21) (a) Chakraborti, A. K.; Gulhane, R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
2003, 1896. (b) Chakraborti, A. K.; Gulhane, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
3521. (c) Chakraborti, A. K.; Gulhane, R. Indian Patent, 266/DEL/2003 (10-3-
2003).
(22) (a) Kumar, R.; Kumar, D.; Chakraborti, A. K. Synthesis 2007, 299.
(b) Khatik, G. L.; Sharma, G.; Kumar, R.; Chakraborti, A. K. Tetrahedron
2007, 63, 1200. (c) Rudrawar, S.; Besra, R. C.; Chakraborti, A. K. Synthesis
2006, 2767. (d) Chakraborti, A. K.; Chankeshwara, S. V. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2006, 4, 2769. (e) Sharma, G.; Kumar, R.; Chakraborti, A. K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2008, 49, 4272. (f) Kumar, D.; Kumar, R.; Chakraborti, A. K. Synthesis
2008, 1249.
(15) (a) Pittelkow, M.;Kamounah, F. S.;Boas,U.;Pedersen, B.;Christensen,
J. B. Synthesis 2004, 2485. (b) Held, I.; Hoff, P.; Stephenson, D. S.; Zipse, H.Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1891.
5968 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 16, 2009