TABLE 2. Spectral Characteristics of Compounds 7, 12, and 14
IR spectrum,
Com-
pound
1Н NMR spectrum, δ, ppm (J, Hz)
ν, cm-1
7а
1640, 1670,
3060
2.5 (1Н, s, SCH3); 6.4 (1H, s, CH=C); 7.0-7.9 (10H, m, 2C6H5);
12.7 (1H, s, NH)
7b
1650, 1675,
3090
2.4 (1H, s, CH3); 2.5 (1H, s, SCH3); 6.4 (1H, s, CH=C); 7.0-7.8 (9H, m,
C6H4, C6H5); 12.8 (1H, s, NH)
12a
12b
1620-1660,
3060
3.06 (3H, s, CH3); 3.20 (3H, s, CH3); 6.5 (1H, s, CH=C);
7.35-7.95 (5H, m, С6H5); 8.68 (1H, s, N=CH)
1610-1630,
1670, 3060
2.29 (3H, s, CH3); 3.04 (3H, s, CH3); 3.18 (3H, s, CH3); 6.49 (1H, s,
CH=C); 7.28 (2Н, d, Jo = 8.3, Н-3 arom.); 7.73 (2Н, d, Jo = 8.3, Н-2
arom.); 8.66 (1H, s, N=CH)
14a
14b
1650-1670,
2280, 3090
1655, 2275,
3080
2.9 (2H, t, JHH = 6.8, CH2); 3.8 (2H, t, JHH = 6.8, CH2); 6.55 (1H, s,
CH=C); 7.4-7.8 (5H, m, C6H5)
2.3 (3H, s, CH3); 2.9 (2H, t, JHH = 6.8, CH2); 3.8 (2H, t, JHH = 6.8, CH2);
6.45 (1H, s, CH=C); 7.25 (2Н, d, Jo = 8.0, Н-3 arom.); 7.70 (2Н, d,
Jo = 8.0, Н-2 arom.)
14c
14d
1630-1660,
2267, 3080
2.9 (2H, t, JHH = 6.8, CH2); 3.8 (2H, t, JHH = 6.8, CH2); 3.85 (3H, s,
OCH3); 6.4 (1H, s, CH=C); 7.25 (2Н, d, Jo = 9.0, Н-3 arom.);
7.60 (2Н, d, Jo = 9.0, Н-2 arom.)
2.9 (2H, t, JHH = 6.8, CH2); 3.8 (2H, t, JHH = 6.8, CH2); 6.5 (1H, s,
CH=C); 7.25 (2Н, d, Jo = 9.0, Н-3 arom.); 7.70 (2Н, d, Jo = 9.0,
Н-2 arom.)
1655-1675,
2275, 3080
With the aim of explaining the results of this investigation and of data obtained previously [6, 7] we
have carried out calculations of the electronic structure of the molecules of cyano compounds 3-6, and also of
the above-mentioned methylenaminoacetonitrile 16 and 2-(cyanoimino)-1,3-dithiolane 17 by the semiempirical
SSP MO LCAO method using the MNDO-PM3 approach [11].
However the distribution of electron density in the molecules of the cyano compounds, as it turned out,
did not permit an explanation of their behavior in reactions with ketenes 2. Among the static reactivity indexes
of cyano compounds 3-6, 16, 17 (total and π-electron charges on nitrogen atoms and the populations of its AO) it
was not possible to find any index, analysis of which would permit arranging these cyano compounds in a series
of increasing (or decreasing) activity in relation to aroylketenes.
According to the calculation, the negative charge on the carbon atom of the cyano group is greater than
that on the nitrogen atom, which seems very unlikely in view of the electronegativity of these atoms. In cyano
compounds 3-5 it turned out that the sp2-hybridized nitrogen atom, according to the calculation, has more
electron excess than the sp-hybridized, although the aroylketene molecule attacks just the latter. The sizes of the
charges on atoms depends essentially on the approach used for the calculation. Thus the charges on the atoms of
the N≡C–N fragment of the compound 5 molecule, according to semiempirical calculations, in the various
approaches were: CNDO/2 [-0.212, +0.152, -0.199 arbitrary units (a. e.)], MNDO (-0.128, +0.002, -0.269 a. e.),
AM1(-0.084, -0.068, -0.212 a. e.), MNDO-PM3 (-0.099, -0.107, -0.050 a. e.).
In the benzoylketene 2a molecule the total/π-electron charges on atoms have the following values:
C(1)=O (-0.144/+0.303), C(1) (+0.417/+0.163), C(2) (-0.488/-0.382), C(3) (+0.426/+0.276). C(3)=O (-0.364/-0.391).
The total/π-electron bond orders are equal to: 2.119/0.592 [C(1)=O], 1.591/0.764 [C(1)=C(2)], 0.987/0.317
[C(2)–C(3)], 1.835/0.864 [C(3)=O]. (The calculated data published in [12] do not contain values for atomic charges
and bond orders)
Since the static indexes of reactivity of the cyano compounds were unable to explain the observed results
we localized the transition states of the [4 + 2] cycloaddition reactions of ketene 2a with cyano compounds 3-6
and the energies of activation were assessed (Ea) as the difference of the enthalpies of formation of the activated
complexes [∆Hf(AC)] and the initital reactants benzoylketene 2a and the cyano compound (CC) [∆Hf(2a)] –
[∆Hf(CC)].
1249