COMMUNICATION
Table 1. Carbocyclization of hydroxylated enynes for the synthesis of 1,2-
diiodo-4-methylcyclohexadiene.[a]
Entry Substrates
R
Solvent
I2
ACTHNUGTRNENUG
Products Yield
[equiv] 2/3[b] [%][c]
[d]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CH3NO2
CH3NO2
CH3NO2
CH3NO2
CH3NO2
CH2Cl2
DCE
1.2
1.5
1.8
2.0
2.5
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
35:1
40:1
50:1
35:1
20:1
30:1
30:1
–
70
84
90
81
76
82
80
Figure 1. X-ray structure of 2c. Ellipsoids set at 40% probability. Carbon:
[d]
THF
DMF
–
0
black; iodine: light gray; hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity.[9]
–
R
strates were effectively converted into the corresponding
2,3-diiodobenzenes 4 in moderate to good yield, as depicted
in Table 2. The molecular structure of the representative
product 4a was determined by X-ray crystallographic analy-
sis (Figure 2).[10] The reaction tolerates the presence of dif-
ferent electron-rich and electron-withdrawing aryl groups.
The steric effect was also tolerated in this reaction. Unfortu-
nately, substrate 1t with a heteroaromatic R group (a furan
nucleus), did not lead to the desired product. This might be
resulting from the fact that the furan nucleus is not stable in
this reaction system. Also, substrates 1v, which lacks a sub-
stituent at C5 (i.e., R1 =H) turned out to be unreactive
under the given reaction conditions, thus demonstrating that
the substituent at C5 is required to stabilize the positive
charge in the cyclic intermediate D.
85% 2c/3c (9:1)
90% 2d/3d
(6:1)
89% 2i/3i (6:1)
84% 2j/3j
(9:1)
R
65% 2m/3m (11:2)[e]
52% 2p/3p
(5:1)
53% 2q/3q (5:1) 70% 2af/3af
(5:1)
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), I2 (1.8 equiv) in solvent (3.0 mL)
at room temperature. [b] The ratio of 2/3 is determined by NMR analysis.
[c] Yield of isolated product. [d] The CH3NO2 is untreated. [e] I2
(1.5 equiv).
(1.8 equiv), a 90% yield was obtained after 2 h, the ratio of
2a/3a was 50:1 (Table 1, entry 3). A further increase of the
amount of I2 gave no better results (Table 1, entries 4 and
5). Changing the reaction media was also not fruitful
(Table 1, entries 6–9). Various representative hydroxylated
enynes with different R groups were then subjected to the
optimized conditions, as depicted in Table 1. Thus, a tandem
carbon–carbon bond formation of hydroxylated enynes pro-
ceeded smoothly to give the corresponding products in mod-
erate to excellent yields. The reaction worked well with aro-
matic R groups. Unfortunately, substrates with only one ali-
phatic group at C1 did not react owning to the poor stabili-
zation of the intermediate B, as delineated in Scheme 1.
Electron-rich aryl groups showed better results than those
with electron-withdrawing groups (1c versus 1p). The mo-
lecular structure of the representative product 2c was deter-
mined by X-ray crystallographic analysis (Figure 1).[9] Inter-
estingly, it was found that substrate 1m with an o-(allyloxy)-
benzene group gave the corresponding product in the pres-
ence of I2 (1.5 equiv), and the double bond in the R group
was selectively retained in this reaction.
Fortunately, in the case of hydroxylated enynes 1w,x,
which contain styrene as R group and two olefin groups, the
styrene group was selectively retained and a good yield of
corresponding 4w,x was obtained (Scheme 2) at the above
reaction conditions at 08C.
Knowing the importance of multi-iodo-terphenyl deriva-
tives in organic materials,[11] which are used for the prepara-
tion of many optical and conductive materials through palla-
dium-catalyzed Sonagashira coupling, Suzuki coupling, and
Heck coupling reactions, we also prepared hydroxylated
enyne 1y, and it was found that under the optimized condi-
tions, the corresponding tetraiodo-1,1’:4’,1’’-terphenyl 4y was
obtained in 51% yield (Scheme 3).
Additionally, hydroxylated enyne 1z with an electron-
withdrawing aryl group was also subjected to the above con-
ditions (Scheme 4). To our delight, the corresponding prod-
uct 4’-bromo-2,3-diiodo-5-methyl-1,1’-biphenyl (4z) was ob-
tained in 52% yield. Then, we thought that if the olefin
group was changed into an aryl group such as 1-(4-bromo-
phenyl)-4-phenylbut-2-yn-1-ol (1aa), the corresponding 2,3-
diiodo-1,4-dihydronaphthalene 4aa could also be obtained.
To our surprise, only (E)-1-(4-bromophenyl)-2,3-diiodo-4-
phenylbut-2-en-1-ol (5aa) was selectively obtained in 56%
yield.
We also investigated a wide range of hydroxylated enynes
(1a–v) with different R and R2 substituents in the presence
of I2 with DDQ as oxidant. It was found that these sub-
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 4986 – 4990
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
4987