3714
Y. Liu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 3712–3714
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (i) KOtBu, ClCH2CONH2, DME, 0 °C, 4 h; (ii) KOtBu, BrCH2CONHCH3, 0 °C, 4 h; (iii) KOtBu, BrCH2CON(CH3)2, 0 °C, 2 h.
Chugai compounds such as 3.11 However, the increased motilin
agonist potency is balanced by an increase in the inhibition of
the hERG potassium channel, a potential cardiovascular safety lia-
bility. In the case of 9b, it is 3.4-fold more potent as a motilin ago-
Table 2
Potency of the 9-O-acetamido compounds 9a–9c and their 400-hydroxy analogues9
Compound
R1, R2
Potency
EC50 (nM)
Analogous
400-hydroxy
EC50 (nM)
ATCC 6310
MIC (l )
g mLꢁ1
nist, however, it has a hERG IC50 of approximately 30
l
M compared
with the 400-hydroxy compound, which has a hERG IC50 of 411
l
M9
9a
9b
9c
H, H
CH3, H
CH3, CH3
36
17
190
52
58
660
>128
128
128
(a more than 13-fold difference). The result is that despite their
superior agonist potency, the 400-deoxy compounds examined in
this study have a lower therapeutic window than their hydroxyl-
ated analogues.
de pointes.16 Thus we investigated these compounds for their inhi-
bition of hERG (Table 3).
Acknowledgments
Consistent with our previous studies, the hERG inhibition is sig-
nificantly decreased at 30 lM in the case of the 9-acetamide com-
pounds 9a–9c relative to the corresponding 9-hydroxy compound
5a.9 Further, the hERG inhibition can be attenuated through the
substituent on the desosamine nitrogen. The more polar hydroxy-
We are grateful to John R. Carney and Chau Q. Tran for mass
spectral analysis, William Crumb, Jr., Zenas Technologies LLC, for
hERG determinations, Dwight J. Hardy, University of Rochester
Medical Center, for MIC determinations and Robert Johnson and Pi-
eter B. Timmermans for useful discussions.
ethyl compound 5c shows less inhibition at 30
lM than the cyclo-
butyl analogue 5b (68% vs 92% inhibition at 30
l
M for 5c and 5b,
References and notes
respectively). However at 300 lM all the compounds are very po-
tent inhibitors of hERG. This is in contrast to the 400-hydroxy ana-
1. Brown, J. C.; Cook, M. A.; Dryburgh, J. R. Can. J. Biochem. 1972, 51, 533.
2. Miller, P.; Gagnon, D.; Dickner, M.; Aubin, P.; St-Pierre, S.; Poitras, P. Peptides
1995, 16, 11.
logues of 9a–9c, which showed inhibitions of 29%, 37%, and 51%
at 300 l
M, respectively.9 The results suggest that the hERG po-
3. Peeters, T. L.; Muls, E.; Janssens, J.; Urbain, J. L.; Bex, M.; Van Cutsem, E.;
Depootere, I.; De Roo, M. Gastroenterology 1992, 102, 97.
4. Janssens, J.; Peeters, T. L.; Vantrappen, G.; Tack, J.; Urbain, J. L.; De Roo, M.;
Muls, E.; Bouillon, R. N. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990, 322, 1028.
5. Faghih, R.; Nellans, H. N.; Plattner, J. Drugs Future 1998, 23, 861.
6. Lartey, P. A.; Nellans, H. N.; Faghih, R.; Petersen, A.; Edwards, C. M.; Freiberg, L.;
Quigley, S.; Marsh, K.; Klein, L. L.; Plattner, J. J. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1793.
7. Koga, H.; Takanashi, H.; Itoh, Z.; Omura, Z. Drugs Future 2002, 27, 255.
8. Koga, H.; Sato, T.; Tsuzuki, K.; Onoda, H.; Kuboniwa, H.; Takanashi, H. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4, 1347.
9. Shaw, S. J.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, H.; Fu, H.; Burlingame, M. A.; Marquez, S.; Li, Y.;
Claypool, M.; Carreras, C. W.; Crumb, W.; Hardy, D. J.; Myles, D. C.; Liu, Y. J. Med.
Chem. 2009, 52, 6851.
10. Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Myles, D. C.; Claypool, M.; Carreras, C. W.; Shaw, S. J. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2010, 18, 7651.
tency is increased by approximately 10-fold when the 400-hydroxyl
group is removed (e.g., in the case of 9c, hERG inhibition of 50% at
30
lM
versus 400-hydroxyl analogue hERG inhibition 51% at
300
lM).
In summary the 400-hydroxyl has been investigated in the
9-dihydro series of motilides. The 400-deoxy compounds are 3- to
4-fold more potent motilin agonists. The trend holds for the more
potent 9-dihydro-9-O-acetamide compounds, which are again
more potent agonists in the 400-deoxy series by 1.5- to 3.5-fold.
The observation is similar to that observed by Koga in the case of
11. Koga, H.; Sato, T.; Tsuzuki, K.; Takanashi, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4,
1649.
12. Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, H.; Claypool, M.; Myles, D. C.; Carreras, C. W.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 5858.
Table 3
hERG inhibition for selected compounds as a percentage of inhibition
13. Thielmans, L.; Depoortere, I.; Perret, J.; Robberecht, P.; Liu, Y.; Thijs, T.;
Carreras, C. W.; Burgeon, E.; Peeters, T. L. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 313,
1379.
14. Carreras, C. W.; Claypool, M.; Santi, D. V.; Schuurkes, J. A.; Peeters, T. L.;
Johnson, R. G. Gastroenterology 2004, 126, A276.
15. Stanat, S. J. C.; Carlton, C. G.; Crumb, W. J.; Agrawal, K. C.; Clarkson, C. W. Mol.
Cell. Biochem. 2003, 254, 1.
16. Ray, W. A.; Murray, K. T.; Meredith, S.; Narasimhulu, S. S.; Hall, K.; Stein, C. M.
N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 1089.
Compound
hERG% inhibition
@30
lM
@300 lM
5a
5b
5c
5e
5f
9a
9b
9c
74
92
68
89
86
28
57
50
nd
100
nd
100
100
86
97
100