510
M. Pitucha et al. · Semicarbazides with Potential Antibacterial Activity
13C NMR (300 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ = 38.88 (CH2), 117.13, bic bacteria, including Gram-positive (Staphylococcus au-
117.54, 117.73, 127.44, 133.97, 135.81, 135.90, 142.80, reus ATCC 6538, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923,
153.72, 154.83, 157.85, 158.88, 159.49, 160.29 (all Ar-C), Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228, Bacillus subtilis
165.57 (C=O), 166.54 (C=O). – C17H18N6O4 (370.4): calcd. ATCC 6633, Bacillus cereus ATCC 10876, Micrococcus
C 55.13, H 3.75, N 22.69; found C 55.09, H 3.84, N 22.58.
luteus ATCC 10240) and Gram-negative microoorganisms
(Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Proteus mirabilis ATCC
12453, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa ATCC 9027). In the first step, the agar dillution
method was used with Mueller-Hinton medium containing
from 31.25 to 1000 µg mL−1 of the tested compounds per
plate. All stock solutions of the tested compounds were dis-
solved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) mixed with distilled
water (1 : 1). It was found that DMSO at the final concen-
tration had no influence on the growth of the tested mi-
croorganisms. Bacterial suspensions were prepared in sterile
saline (0.85 % NaCl) with an optical density of McFarland
standard 0.5 (150×106 CFUmL−1; CFU = colony forming
units), and then diluted (1 : 100). 20 µL of each suspension
was put onto Mueller-Hinton agar containing the tested com-
Preparation of 4,4ꢀ-bis[1-(isoquinolin-3-yl)semicarbazide]
diphenylmethane 18
Isoquinoline carboxylic acid hydrazide (20 mmol) was
dissolved in absolute ethanol (10 mL) and 4,4ꢀ-methylene-
diphenylisocyanate (10 mmol) was added. The solution was
warmed for 3 h on a water bath, allowed to cool to r. t. and
then filtered to give a colorless solid.
M. p. 250 – 251 ◦C. – Yield 71 %. – 1H NMR (300 MHz,
[D6]DMSO): δ = 3.86 (s, 2H), 7.08 – 9.42 (m, 20H), 9.50
(2× s, 2H), 9.99 (2× s, 2H), 10.46 (2× s, 2H). – 13C NMR
(300 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ = 39.06 (CH2), 116.92, 117.21,
119.01, 126.46, 126.64, 127.45, 127.55, 128.02, 130.08,
133.74, 133.85, 136.07, 141.64, 150.33 (all Ar-C), 162.73
(C=O). – C35H28N8O4 (624.6): calcd. C 67.29, H 4.52,
N 17.94; found C 67.31, H 4.44, N 17.88.
◦
pounds. The plates were incubated at 37 C for 18 h. The
MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) was defined as the
lowest concentration preventing visible growth of the tested
bacteria.
Theoretical calculations
Energies, geometrical parameters (bond lengths, angles
and torsion angles) and charge distribution on the atoms for
structures 1 – 8 were calculated with NWCHEM 5.0 [17, 18]
at the RHF/SCF/6-31G** level of theory. The structures were
fully optimized without any symmetry constraints, and the
initial geometries were built de novo using the AM1 semi-
empirical SCF-MO method [19] implemented in the pro-
gram package HYPERCHEM (version 4.5) [20]. The program
ECCE [21, 22] was used for graphical visualization of the
molecular structure of compound 7.
In the next step, the susceptibility of reference strains
to compound 7 was assayed spectrophotometrically by the
broth microdilution method; the MIC was again defined as
the lowest concentration of a compound at which there is
no visible growth of the tested bacteria. After incubation
◦
(37 C for 18 h), the optical density (OD600) was measured
for the bacterial culture in the broth medium, and the MIC
values were determined by comparison with the growth of
a control (compound-free) medium. Gentamycin, a broad-
spectrum aminoglicoside, was used as a antibacterial refer-
ence compound. The same volume of DMSO without any
test compound was used as a control, and no inhibition was
observed.
Antimicrobial activity
All synthesized compounds were screened for in-vitro
antibacterial activity against 10 reference strains of aero-
[1] M. Pitucha, L. Mazur, U. Kosikowska, A. Pachuta-
Stec, A. Malm, Ł. Popiołek, Z. Rza¸czyn´ska, Het-
eroatom Chem. 2010, 21, 215 – 221.
[2] M. Pitucha, M. Dobosz, K. Ste¸pniak, I. Dybała, A. E.
Kozioł, Pol. J. Chem. 2007, 81, 2103 – 2114.
[3] M. Dobosz, M. Pitucha, I. Dybała, A. E. Kozioł, Coll.
Czech. Chem. Commun. 2003, 68, 792 – 800.
[7] S. V. Andurkar, C. Beguin, J. P. Stables, H. Kohn,
J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1475 – 1478.
[8] G. S. Nichol, W. Clegg, Acta Crystallogr. 2005, C61,
o383 – o385.
[9] M. A. Trikoupis, P. Gerbaux, D. J. Lavorato, R. Flam-
mang, J. K. Terlouw, Intern. J. Mass Spectrom. 2002,
217, 1 – 22.
[4] P. Yogeeswari, D. Sriran, V. Saraswat, J. V. Ragaven-
dran, M. M. Kumar, S. Murugesan, R. Thirumurugan,
J. P. Stables, Eur. J. Pharma. Sci. 2003, 20, 341 – 346.
[5] O. V. Fedorova, G. G. Mordovskoi, G. L. Rusinov, I. G.
Ovchinnikova, M. N. Zueva, M. A. Kravchenko, O. N.
Chupakhin, Pharm. Chem. J. 1998, 32, 64 – 66.
[10] M. Wujec, M. Pitucha, M. Dobosz, U. Kosikowska,
A. Malm, Acta Pharm. 2004, 54, 251 – 260.
[11] M. Pitucha, Z. Rza¸czyn´ska, L. Mazur, X-ray Structure
Analysis Online 2009, 25, 67 – 68.
[12] M. Karlsson, C. Fellstrom, A. Gunnarsson, A. Landen,
A. Franklin, J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 2596 – 2604.
[13] J. Rohde, M. Kessler, C. G. Baums, G. Amtsberg, Vet-
erinary Microbiology 2004, 102, 25 – 32.
´
[6] M. Pitucha, B. Polak, R. Swieboda, U. Kosikowska,
A. Malm, Z. Naturforsch. 2009, 64b, 570 – 576.
- 10.1515/znb-2011-0511
Downloaded from De Gruyter Online at 09/12/2016 01:05:50AM
via free access