dimensional order is more stable against an electric field than
cubic BP. The instability against the electric field for the cubic BP
is one of the reasons to generate the hysteresis of the present
cubic BP. The rise time in the BPIII is almost same to that in the
cubic BP. In the present system, the response speed is very slow
because of the negative dielectric anisotropy of compound 1. The
response time in BPIII can be readily shortened to less than 1 ms
at room temperature by using materials with positive dielectric
anisotropy.33
Conclusions
We designed a new biphenyl derivative possessing 2,3-difluoro-
1,4-diphenylbenzene units and found that it exhibits the N and
SmCanti phases. A mixture with a chiral additive exhibited
a cubic blue phase and/or an amorphous BPIII with a wide
temperature range. Comparing the voltage-dependent trans-
mittance in the BPIII and the cubic BP of a single mixture, the
BPIII was found to have the following advantages: (1) free from
hysteresis, (2) lower transmittance without an electric field, (3)
lower threshold and saturated voltages, and (4) higher stability
against an electric field. BPIII with the same symmetry as
isotropic liquid has favourable characteristics for application to
display devices: it is optically isotropic, hysteresis free, and stable
in an electric field.
Fig. 9 Optical transmittances of the mixture ISO-(6OBA)2 (10 wt%) and
compound 1 (90 wt%) as a function of time under an AC field of 12 V
mmꢁ1 at a frequency of 10 Hz in (a) BPIII at 80 ꢀC and (b) cubic BP at
60 ꢀC.
Acknowledgements
We thank Chisso Petrochemical Corporation for providing the
cells used for this study. This work was partially supported by
a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) from the Japan
Society for the Promotion of Science (no. 22350078) and a grant
for Hirosaki University Institutional Research.
that without an electric field. After eliminating the electric field
and then re-applying it to the sample, no electro-optical switch-
ing occurred. This electro-optical behaviour in the cubic BP
occurred under any electric field with a magnitude of 6–12 V
mmꢁ1. Phase transition temperatures of the sample after applying
electric field were identical to those of the virgin sample. One
possible explanation for the unusual decrease in the trans-
mittance is an electric-field-induced phase transition from N* to
isotropic liquid. The electro-optical responses in BPIII and cubic
BP are reproducible. Therefore the marked difference in the
electro-optical response between BPIII and cubic BP is attributed
to the difference in the blue phase structure between them.
According to earlier studies of electric field effects in cubic blue
phases,1 an increasing electric field initially lengthens the blue
phase lattice parameter and causes birefringence. With higher
fields, the blue phases may transform between themselves, to the
helical phase, and ultimately to the nematic phase. Because BPIII
has no lattice structure, we infer that the rise process in BPIII
includes two transformations: a double twisted structure to
a single twisted structure breaking their cylindrical structure
(BPIII to N*) and the single twisted structure to the nematic
structure (N* to N). With respect to the cubic BP, short-range
correlation due to the lattice structure can remain under the
electric field. A double twisted structure might transform to an
unstable single twisted structure with the short-range correlation.
The activation energy of transition from the electric-field-
induced N* state to the isotropic liquid for cubic BP is thought be
lower than that from the electric-field-induced N state to the
isotropic liquid for BPIII. Further investigation is necessary to
clear the mechanism. Amorphous BPIII without three-
References
1 P. P. Crooker, in Chirality in Liquid Crystals, ed. H. S. Kitzerow and
C. Bahr, Springer, New York, 2001, ch. 7, p. 186.
€
2 H. Stegemeyer, TH. Blumel, K. Hiltrop, H. Onusseit and F. Porsch,
Liq. Cryst., 1986, 1, 3.
3 E. Dubois-Violette and B. Pansu, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 1988, 165,
151.
4 H.-S. Kitzerow and P. P. Crooker, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1991, 67, 2151.
5 R. M. Hornreich, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1991, 67, 2155.
6 H. Kikuchi, M. Yokota, Y. Hisakado, H. Yang and T. Kajiyama,
Nat. Mater., 2002, 1, 111.
7 M. Nakata, Y. Takanishi, J. Watanabe and H. Takezoe, Phys. Rev. E:
Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top., 2003, 68, 041710.
8 A. Chanishvili, G. Chilaya, G. Petriashvili and P. J. Collings, Phys.
Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys., 2005, 71, 051705.
9 A. Yoshizawa, M. Sato and J. Rokunohe, J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15,
3285.
10 H. J. Coles and M. N. Pivnenko, Nature, 2005, 436, 997.
11 C. V. Yelamaggad, I. S. Shashikala, G. Liao, D. S. S. Rao,
S. K. Prasad, Q. Li and A. Jakli, Chem. Mater., 2006, 18, 6100.
12 T. Noma, M. Ojima, H. Asagi, Y. Kawahira, A. Fujii, M. Ozaki and
H. Kikuchi, e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol., 2008, 6, 17.
13 W. He, G. Pan, Z. Yang, D. Zhao, G. Niu, W. Huang, X. Yuan,
J. Guo, H. Cao and H. Yang, Adv. Mater., 2009, 21, 2050.
14 E. Karatairi, B. Rozic, Z. Kutnjak, V. Tzitzios, G. Nounesis,
G. Cordoyiannis, J. Thoen, C. Glorieux and S. Kralj, Phys. Rev. E:
Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys., 2010, 81, 041703.
15 S. Taushanoff, K. V. Le, J. Williams, R. J. Twieg, B. K. Sadashiva,
H. Takezoe and A. Jakli, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 5893.
16 M. Lee, S.-T. Hur, H. Higuchi, K. Song, S.-W. Choi and H. Kikuchi,
J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 5813.
19136 | J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 19132–19137
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011