interest and important for modern organic and medicinal
chemistry, particularly, for drug discovery and development.
However, to the best of our knowledge, a one-pot synthesis
of lactonized fused pyrroles via domino reaction involving
intramolecular allylic activation has not been well docu-
mented yet.
Scheme 1
In the meantime, there has been enormous interest in
developing the direct and selective functionalization on
allylic CÀH bonds6,7 including the direct formations of
CÀO bonds.8 These methodologies would provide the
intrinsic advantages, such as step-economy, high chemos-
electivity and easy operation leading to “benign by design”
of green synthesis.9 The design of efficient allylic lactoniza-
tion without the use of metal catalysts has remained as a
challenge at the forefront of organic chemistry.
In the past several years, we and others have developed a
series of domino reactions that provided easy access to
multiple functionalized ring structures of chemical and
pharmaceutical interest.10À12 We also established a new
three-component domino reaction for the synthesis of
multifunctionalized indole derivatives.10f The reaction is
easy to perform simply by mixing readily available car-
boxylic acids, N-aryl enaminones, and arylglyoxal mono-
hydrate under microwave (MW) irradiation. During the
continuation of this project, we found that when N-aryl
enaminones were replaced by N-amino acid counterparts,
the reaction can be directed toward lactonization to form
tricyclic fused pyrrole derivatives that can directly serve for
pharmaceutical research (Scheme 1). In this paper, we
disclose novel domino reactions for the synthesis of
polyfunctionalized and tricyclic fused pyrroles and
dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-1-ones. The attractive aspect of
the present domino reaction is shown by the fact that the
novel construction of two new rings including pyrrole and
oxazinone skeletons and the direct CÀO bond formation
can be easily achieved via metal-free allylic lactonization in
a one-pot operation.
In the initial experiment, the enaminone 1a which was
derived from glycine and 5,5-dimethylcyclohexane-1,
3-dione was subjected to the reaction with phenylglyoxal
monohydrate (2a) under microwave (MW) irradiation.
Various solvents, such as DMF, benzene, HOAc, EtOH,
HCOOH, and CF3COOH, were employed as reaction
media. Among these solvents, the first two aprotic ones
(DMF and benzene) led to poor yields (<10%) even at an
enhanced temperature of 80 °C under MW irradiation.
The weak protic solvent, EtOH, resulted in product 3a in
38% isolated yield. We found that in acetic acid, 1a was
converted into the product 3a in a good yield (81%). It
turned out that acetic acid can serve not only as a suitable
medium but also as an adequate Bronsted acid promoter
for the present reaction, while the stronger acids, HCOOH
and CF3COOH, led to much lower chemical yields
(<15%).
With these optimized conditions in hand, we next ex-
amined the scope of the reaction by using readily available
and common starting materials. As revealed in Table 1, a
range of tricyclic fused indole derivatives can be formed
under the optimized condition in good to excellent yields
(65À89%). Enaminones derived from three different ami-
no acids (R = H, Me and Et, 1aÀc) were proven to be
suitable for this reaction. Meanwhile, a variety of aryl-
glyoxal monohydrates 2 bearing either electron-withdraw-
ing or electron-donating groups can react with above
enaminones 1aÀc to give corresponding tricyclic fused
pyrrole products 3aÀx (67% À89%). The performed
enaminone substrate 1d can also participate in the reaction
yielding products 3yÀz in good yields of 65À73%. Inter-
estingly, the complete anti diatereoselectivity products
3fÀz was achieved as determined by 1H NMR and X-ray
diffractional analyses. Furthermore, pyrrolo[3,2,1-kl]phe-
noxazin-3(4H)-one 3aa can be readily generated by react-
ing 2-aminophenol-derived enaminone 1e with arylglyoxal
monohydrate under these conditions.
(7) For representative examples of sp3 CÀH bond functionalization,
see: (a) Li, Z.; Li, C.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 56–57. (b) Li, Z.;
Bohle, D. S.; Li, C.-J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 8928–
8933. (c) Li, Z.; Li, C.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11810–11811. (d)
Li, Z.; Cao, L.; Li, C.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6505–6507. (e)
Zhang, Y.; Li, C.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1949–1952. (f) Li,
Z.; Li, C.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6968–6969. (g) Li, Z.; Li, C.-J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3672–3673. (h) Zhang, Y.; Li, C.-J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4242–4243. (i) Stuart, D. R.; Fagnou, K. Science
2007, 316, 1172–1175. (j) Dwight, T. A.; Rue, N. R.; Charyk, D.;
Josselyn, R.; DeBoef, B. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3137–3139.
(8) Lee, J. M.; Park, E. J.; Cho, S. H.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 7824–7825.
(9) (a) Winterton, N. Green Chem. 2001, 3, G73–G75. (b) Anastas,
P. T.; Warner, J. C. Green Chemistry Theory and Practice; Oxford
University Press: New York, 1998.
(10) (a) Jiang, B.; Li, C.; Shi, F.; Tu, S.-J.; Kaur, P.; Wever, W.; Li, G.
J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2962–2965. (b) Jiang, B.; Tu, S.-J.; Kaur, P.;
Wever, W.; Li, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11660–11661. (c) Jiang,
B.; Wang, X.; Shi, F.; Tu, S.-J.; Ai, T.; Ballew, A.; Li, G. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 74, 9486–9489. (d) Li, G.; Wei, H. X.; Kim, S. H.; Carducci, M. D.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4277–4280. (e) Ma, N.; Jiang, B.;
Zhang, G.; Tu, S.-J.; Wever, W.; Li, G. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1357–
1361. (f) Jiang, B.; Yi, M.-S.; Shi, F.; Tu, S.-J.; Pindi, S.; McDowell, P.;
Li, G. Chem. Commun. 2011, 808–810.
(11) For domino reactions and atom economic synthesis see refs 11
and 12: (a) Tietze, L. F.; Brasche, G.; Gericke, K. M. Domino Reactions
in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006. (b) Tietze, L. F.; Brazel,
C. C.; Hoelsken, S.; Magull, J.; Ringe, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
5246–5249. (c) Trost, B. M. Science 1991, 254, 1471–1477. (d) Padwa, A.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3072–3081. (e) Padwa, A.; Bur, S. K. Tetra-
hedron 2007, 63, 5341–5378.
(12) (a) Huang, Y.; Walji, A. M.; Larsen, C. H.; MacMillan, D. W. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15051–15053. (b) Lu, M.; Zhu, D.; Lu, Y.;
Hou, Y.; Tan, B.; Zhong, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 10187–
10191. (c) Snyder, S. A.; Breazzano, S. P.; Ross, A. G.; Lin, Y.; Zografos,
A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1753–1765. (d) Yang, J. W.; Fonseca,
M. T. H.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15036–15037.
As usual, this reaction is easy to perform simply by
mixing enaminones 1 and arylglyoxal monohydrates 2 in
HOAc under microwave irradiation and exhibits the great
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 3, 2012
701