gave very poor yields. The reason why t-BuOI is the most
suitable iodinating reagent in the reaction system could be
due to the liberation of only a weak acid (t-BuOH) instead
of HI that should be trapped by an external base in similar
reaction systems.9
Table 2. Substrate Scope of Homoallyl and Propargyl Aminesa
Having optimized the reaction conditions, the substrate
scope was then explored (Table 1). β-Branched allyl amine
1b was transformed into the corresponding carbamate
2b in moderate yield (entry 2). An allyl amine having a
γ-disubstituent 1c was also applicable to the reaction (entry 3).
When structurally defined geometric isomers 1d and 1e
were employed as substrates, the reaction proceeded ster-
ospecifically to afford 2d and 2e as single stereoisomers in
bothcases (entries 4 and 5).14 Moreover, N,N-diallylamine
(1f) was successfully transformed into the corresponding
carbamate 2f while keeping the other allylic moiety intact
(entry 6). N-Substitution with alkyl groups did not signifi-
cantly retard reaction efficiencies (entries 7ꢀ9). Various
functionalities showed good compatibility with the reaction
conditions, leading to the corresponding cyclic carbamates
2jꢀ2l in good to high yields (entries 10ꢀ12).
The successful results in the transformation of allyl
amines into five-membered cyclic carbamates through
the CO2 fixation prompted us to further investigate the
use of homoallyl and propargyl amines as substrates
(Table 2). When homoallyl amine 1m was subjected to
the reaction conditions, six-membered carbamate 2m was
obtained in moderate yield (entry 1), while γ-branched
homoallyl amine 1n was also converted to the correspond-
ing carbamate 2n in moderate yield (entry 2). Unfortu-
nately, the reaction using the simplestpropargylamine (1o)
failed to provide the desired product 2o (entry 3). In sharp
contrast, amines bearing a gem-disubstituent at the pro-
pargylic position gave cyclic carbamates 2p and 2q in good
yields as sole constitutional isomers with an E-configuration
(entries 4 and 5).14 This significant discrepancy in these
reaction outcomes would be explained in terms of the
“ThorpeꢀIngold effect”15 through the intramolecular cy-
clization process from the intermediately generated iodo-
nium intermediates (vide infra). It is noted that the silyl
group on the acetylenic carbon of 1r survived the reaction
conditions in which “Iþ” species coexist, leading to 2r
having a tetra-substituted olefinic moietyin moderate yield
(entry 6).
a Reaction conditions: CO2 (1 atm), homoallyl or propargyl amine
(0.5 mmol), NaI (0.5 mmol), t-BuOCl (0.5 mmol), and MeCN (3 mL).
b Isolated yield.
was generated in situ from NaI and t-BuOCl,6,7 under
the atmospheric pressure (1 atm) of CO2 in acetonitrile
at room temperature. Gratifyingly, the expected 4-
iodomethyl-2-oxazolidinone (2a) was successfully produced
and isolated in 47% yield. To improve the efficiency of
the reaction, reaction parameters such as solvents and
temperatures were scrutinized (Table S1). As a result, the
reaction at a lower temperature (ꢀ20 °C) in acetonitrile
was found to give the desired carbamate 2a in the highest
yield of 91% (entry 1, Table 1). The reactions with other
iodinating reagents such as IPy2BF4 (BPIT) and N-
iodosuccinimide (NIS) resulted in rather low yields of 2a.13
TheemploymentofI2 alone or the concomitant use of I2/Et3N
The oxazolidinones that were obtained by our method
would serve as useful building blocks, because an iodo-
functionality attached to sp3- or sp2-hybridized carbon
(14) The determination of their stereochemistry is described in the
Supporting Information.
(15) Beesley, R. M.; Ingold, C. K.; Thorpe, J. F. J. Chem. Soc., Trans.
1915, 107, 1080.
(16) (a) Wotal, A. C.; Weix, D. J. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1476.
(b) Fusano, A.; Fukuyama, T.; Nishitani, S.; Inouye, T.; Ryu, I. Org.
Lett. 2010, 12, 2410. (c) Buzas, A. K.; Istrate, F. M.; Gagosz, F.
Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1889. (d) Jensen, A. E.; Knochel, P. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 79. (e) Pyun, D. K.; Lee, C. H.; Ha, H.-J.; Park, C. S.; Chang,
J.-W.; Lee, W. K. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4197. (f) Sibi, M.; Rutherford, D.;
Renhowe, P. A.; Li, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7509. (g) Duddu, R.;
Eckhardt, M.; Furlong, M.; Knoess, H. P.; Berger, S.; Knochel, P.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2415. (h) Tam, T. F.; Thomas, E.; Krantz, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 1127.
(12) (a) Yoshida, S.; Fukui, K.; Kikuchi, S.; Yamada, T. Chem. Lett.
2009, 38, 786. (b) Kayaki, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Suzuki, T.; Ikariya, T.
Green Chem. 2006, 8, 1019. (c) Shi, M.; Shen, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
16. (d) Bacchi, A.; Chiusoli, G. P.; Costa, M.; Gabriele, B.; Righi, C.;
Salerno, G. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1209. (e) Mitsudo, T.-A.; Hori, Y.;
Yamakawa, Y.; Watanabe, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 4417.
(13) For details, see the Supporting Information.
4876
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 18, 2012