catalyzed Heck type cyclization of 7 would produce A-ring
synthon 2 stereoselectively (Scheme 1).
The Michael addition-triflation process was surveyed
using Ph2P(O)Li,11 Ph2P(O)Na, and Ph2P(O)K as a metalated
diphenylphosphine oxide and 2-[N,N-bis(trifluoromethylsul-
fonyl)amino]-5-chloropyridine12 as a triflating agent. The
results are summarized in Table 1. To our delight, we found
Scheme 1
Table 1. Preparation of Enol Triflate 7 from Vinyl Ketone 4a
isolated yield (%)
entry
phosphorus reagentb
7 (E:Z)c
13
1
2
3
4
5
Ph2P(O)Li
89 (0:100)
71 (0:100)
7 (0:100)
3 (8:92)
7
12
13
13
28
Ph2P(O)Li (HMPA)d
Ph2P(O)Na
Ph2P(O)K
The required vinyl ketone 4 was prepared from known
S-dioxinone 9 (97% ee), easily available4c,7 from 2,2,6-
trimethyl-4H-1,3-dioxi-4-one (8), as depicted in Scheme 2.
Ph2PLi
64 (0:100)
aAfter reaction of 4 and Ph2P(O)M or Ph2PLi (1.2 equiv) in THF at
-78 °C for 30 min, the reaction mixture was treated with the triflating
reagent (1.6 equiv) and stirred at -78 °C for 20 h. b Prepared from
Ph2P(O)H or Ph2PH (1.2 equiv) using n-BuLi, NaH, or KH (1.2 equiv) as
a base in THF at 0 °C for 1 h. c Determined by 1H NMR analysis. d HMPA
(1.2 equiv) was added with the triflating reagent.
Scheme 2
that this process was realized very effectively using Ph2P-
(O)Li under the conditions listed in entry 1. Thus, upon
successive treatment with Ph2P(O)Li and the triflating agent
in THF at -78 °C, vinyl ketone 4 underwent stereoselective
Michael addition-triflation reaction to give enol triflate 7
in 89% yield together with untriflated ketone 13 (7% yield).
The corresponding E-isomer of 7 was not produced in this
case. This result strongly suggests the participation of
chelated intermediate 6 (M ) Li) in this process as we
expected. Addition of HMPA appeared to interfere with
triflation of the resulting lithium enolate to decrease the yield
of 7 although the combined yield of 7 and 13 was almost
same as that of entry 1 (entry 2). Both Ph2P(O)Na and Ph2P-
(O)K are ineffective in this transformation, producing 7 and
13 in poor combined yield in each case (entries 3 and 4).
Furthermore, it was also found that Michel addition of Ph2-
PLi13 to 4, followed by in situ triflation of the resulting
enolate, gave 7 in 64% yield along with 13 (28% yield) after
oxidative workup with aqueous H2O2 (entry 5). This process
again proceeded with complete Z-selectivity, suggesting
participation of enolate 14 stabilized by chelation. It is
important to note that ketone 13 could be converted to 7 in
60% yield by deprotonation with n-BuLi, followed by
triflation at -78 °C in THF. The perfect regio- and
stereoselectivity of this process can be explained by assuming
preferential deprotonation of Ha rather than Hb via chelation
Reaction of 9 with Cl2Al[N(OMe)Me],8,9 followed by reduc-
tion of the resulting 10 with Me4NB(OAc)3,10 gave anti-diol
11 in 94:6 diasteroselectivity. Diol 11 was then subjected to
silylation and Grignard reaction8 using vinylmagnesium
bromide to afford vinyl ketone 4 in 75% overall yield.
(6) For relevant intramolecular Heck reactions, see: refs 4d-g and (a)
Codesido, E. M.; Cid, M. M.; Castedo, L.; Mourin˜o, Granja, J. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 5861. (b) Higashi, T.; Miura, K.; Kikuchi, R.;
Shimada, K.; Hiyamizu, H.; Ooi, H.; Iwabuchi, Y.; Hatakeyama, S.;
Kubodera, N. Steroids 2000, 65, 281. (c) Hatakeyama, S.; Ikeda, T.;
Maeyama, J.; Esumi, T.; Iwabuchi, Y.; Irie, H.; Kawase, A.; Kubodera, N.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 2871. (d) Yokoyama, H.; Takahashi, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 595. (e) Hatakeyama, S.; Irie, H.; Shintani, T.;
Noguchi, Y. Yamada, H. Nishizawa, M. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 13369. (f)
Takahashi, T.; Nakazawa, M. Synlett 1993, 37. (g) Mascaren˜as, J. L.; Garc´ıa,
A. M.; Castedo, L.; Mourin˜o, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4365.
(7) Singer, R. A.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12360.
(8) Nahm, S.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 22, 3815.
(9) Shimizu, T.; Osako, K.; Nakata, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2685.
(10) Evans, D. A.; Chapman, K. T.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1988. 110, 3560.
(11) Edwards, M. L.; Stemerick, D. M.; Jarvi, E. T. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 5571.
(12) Comins, D. L.; Dehghani, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6299.
(13) Vedejs, E.; Fuch, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95. 822.
474
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 3, 2001