Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 316–322.
(melanoma, IC70 about 50 nM, each), and in particular LXFA-
289 (lung, adenocarcinoma), PAXF-546L (pancreas), and PXF-
1118 (pleuramesothelioma, IC70 > 100 nM, IC50 about 50 nM,
each). Diazirinyl-substituted malevamide D 30 was about 200
times less cytotoxic than 1.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information File 1
Procedures of synthesis and biotest, X-ray data and 1H,
13C NMR spectra of selected compounds.
To obtain clues on the likely mode of action of 1 and 30, the in
vitro activity data were compared with those of 177 reference
compounds by COMPARE analysis. Individual IC50 values of a
test compound were correlated with those of 177 reference
compounds as determined for Oncotest's 42 cell line panel and
expressed quantitatively as Spearman correlation coefficients
were correlated to each other. For compound 30, COMPARE
analysis revealed the highest similarities towards tubulin inter-
acting compounds like the vinca alkaloids vinfluine, vincristine,
vindesine and the taxoid compound docetaxel. Furthermore,
good correlations were detected towards PLK-1 inhibitors.
Similar results were obtained for 1. Determining a Spearman
coefficient of 0.742 between 1 and 30 suggested that these com-
pounds share the same mode of action, most probably antimi-
totic activity based on tubulin interaction.
Acknowledgements
We thank Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) for the generous
gift of chromatography materials. The BASF Group
(Ludwigshafen, Germany) and Honeywell Specialty Chemicals
Seelze GmbH (Seelze, Germany) are thanked for the donation
of solvents.
References
1. Horgen, F. D.; Kazmierski, E. B.; Westenburg, H. E.; Yoshida, W. Y.;
2. Sone, H.; Shibata, T.; Fujita, T.; Ojika, M.; Yamada, K.
3. Pettit, G. R.; Hogan, F.; Toms, S. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 962–968.
4. Bradley, A. M.; Devine, M.; DeRemer, D. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm.
Conclusion
5. Pettit, G. R.; Sing, S. B.; Srirangam, J. K.; Hogan-Pierson, F.;
Williams, M. D. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1796–1800.
Our cytotoxicity test results for 1 confirm those obtained by
Scheuer and co-workers who determined IC50 values of about
0.7 nM against four cell lines (mouse lymphoma P-388, human
lung carcinoma A-549, human colon carcinoma HT-29, human
melanoma MEL-28) [1]. We had hoped that introduction of a
Brunner-type diazirine unit in the para-position of the phenyl
ring of 1 could lead to an analog that was still active, because it
had been shown in several SAR studies that limited variation of
the amine or alcohol component at the C-terminal amide or
ester moieties of the dolastatin family members can be toler-
ated without much loss of cytotoxicity. This includes epimeriza-
tion of the thiazole-carrying stereocenter of 3 [18], replacement
of the phenyl by a methyl group, or removal of the thiazole ring
[7]. Auristatins, of which some undergo clinical trials, are char-
acterized by lacking the thiazole ring of 3 [19]. Pettit and
co-workers prepared auristatin TP, which carries a phosphate
unit in the para-position of the phenyl ring, and also two amino-
quinoline derivatives that were as cytotoxic as dolastatin 10 [3].
Antibody conjugates of monomethylauristatin E functionalized
on the C-terminal side have also shown promising pharmaco-
logical profiles [20,21]. However, compound 30 is at least 200
times less active than the natural product 1. Lower cytotoxicity
may be associated with solubility problems. We will now search
for more water-soluble, photoactivatable analogs of 1. Nunes
and coworkers had synthesized a benzophenone-labelled deriva-
tive of the analog HTI-286, which competes with 3, and were
able to identify α-tubulin as binding partner [22].
6. Reddy, G. V.; Rao, G. V.; Sreevani, V.; Iyngar, D. S. Tetrahedron Lett.
7. Miyazaki, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Natsume, T.; Gondo, M.; Mikami, T.;
Sakakibara, K.; Tsukagoshi, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1995, 43,
8. Maugras, I.; Poncet, J.; Jouin, P. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 2807–2816.
9. Cella, R.; Venturoso, R. C.; Stefani, H. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49,
10.Bowman, R. E.; Stroud, H. H. J. Chem. Soc. 1950, 1342–1345.
11.Aurelio, L.; Box, J. S.; Brownlee, R. T. C.; Hughes, A. B.; Sleebs, M. M.
12.Benedetti, E.; Carlomagno, T.; Fraternali, F.; Hamada, Y.; Hayashi, K.;
Paolillo, L.; Shioiri, T. Biopolymers 1995, 36, 525–538.
13.Harrigan, G. G.; Luesch, H.; Yoshida, W. Y.; Moore, R. E.;
Nagle, D. G.; Paul, V. J.; Mooberry, S. L.; Corbett, T. H.;
Valeriote, F. A. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 1075–1077.
14.Boyd, V. L.; Bozzini, M.; Guga, P. J.; DeFranco, R. J.; Yuan, P.-M.;
Loudon, G. M.; Nguyen, D. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2581–2587.
15.Wartmann, T.; Lindel, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 1649–1652.
16.Bolli, M.; Lehmann, D.; Mathys, B.; Müller, C.; Nayler, O.; Velker, J.;
Weller, T. Novel thiophene derivatives. WO Patent WO 2006/100635
A2, Sept 28, 2006.
321