1180
R. Ugajin et al.
LETTER
(f) Sakamoto, F.; Ikeda, S.; Tsukamoto, G. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1984, 32, 2241.
O
O
O
O
OH
R2
CO2
O
O
(4) Satoa, K.; Zhaob, L.; Okadab, S.; Yamaki, J. J. Power
Sources 2011, 196, 5617; and references cited therein.
(5) There are some patents, for example: (a) Simon, B.; Boeuve,
J.-P. US 005626981A, 1997. (b) Barker, J.; Gao, F. US
005712059A, 1998. (c) Naruse, Y.; Fujita, S.; Omaru, A. US
005714281A, 1998.
R1
R1
Ag+
DBU
H
R1
R2
R2
Scheme 3 Plausible reaction mechanism of the formation of vinyl-
ene carbonate
(6) (a) Schobert, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 855.
(b) Gauthier, J. Y.; Leblanc, Y.; Black, W. C.; Chan, C.-C.;
Cromlish, W. A.; Gordon, R.; Kennedey, B. P.; Lau, C. K.;
Léger, S.; Wang, Z.; Ethier, D.; Guay, J.; Mancini, J.;
Riendeau, D.; Tagari, P.; Vickers, P.; Wong, E.; Xu, L.;
Prasit, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 87. (c) Sun, C.-
Q.; Cheng, P. T. W.; Stevenson, J.; Dejneka, T.; Brown, B.;
Wang, T. C.; Robl, J. A.; Poss, M. A. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 1161. (d) Dürr, S.; Höhlein, U.; Schobert, R.
J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 458, 89.
In summary, it was found that the silver salt/DBU system
was applied to the reaction of secondary propargylic alco-
hols including internal and terminal alkyne derivatives
with carbon dioxide and various corresponding vinylene
carbonates were produced in good to high yields. Based
on this catalytic system, the substrate having the cinnamyl
moiety was found to be transformed into the correspond-
ing vinylene carbonate in good yield when silver(II) pico-
linate was used as the silver salt. Further investigations are
currently under way.
(7) Sahu, D. P. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B: Org. Chem. Incl. Med.
Chem. 2002, 41, 1722.
(8) Papageorgiou, G.; Corrie, J. E.T. Tetrahedron 1997, 53,
3917.
(9) (a) Fischler, H.-M.; Heine, H.-G.; Hartmann, W.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 13, 1701. (b) Newman, M. S.;
Addor, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 1263.
(10) Kim, K. H.; Park, B. R.; Lim, J. W.; Kim, J. N. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2011, 52, 3463.
(11) When the reaction was carried out under the balloon
pressure, the yield was decreased into 77% yield.
(12) General Procedure
Supporting Information for this article is available online at
m
iotSrat
ungIifoop
r
t
References and Notes
(1) (a) Yamada, W.; Sugawara, Y.; Cheng, H.-M.; Ikeno, T.;
Yamada, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 2604. (b) Yoshida, S.;
Fukui, K.; Kikuchi, K.; Yamada, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 4072. (c) Yoshida, S.; Fukui, K.; Kikuchi, S.; Yamada,
T. Chem. Lett. 2009, 38, 786. (d) Kikuchi, S.; Sekine, K.;
Ishida, T.; Yamada, T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51,
6989. (e) Ishida, T.; Kikuchi, S.; Tsubo, T.; Yamada, T. Org.
Lett. 2013, 15, 848. (f) Ishida, T.; Kikuchi, S.; Yamada, T.
Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3710.
The reaction was performed using a pressure test tube
equipped with a stirring bar in a 50 mL autoclave. To a
solution of propargyl alcohol 1 (0.30 mmol) and AgOAc
(0.030 mmol, 5.0 mg) in toluene (2.0 mL) was added DBU
(0.12 mmol, 18 μL) under an inert gas. Immediately, CO2
gas was purged, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 30 °C
under 1.5 MPa CO2 pressure. After the reaction was
completed, the purification by column chromatography
[SiO2, eluted with n-hexane–EtOAc (100:1)] gave the
corresponding carbonate 2.
(2) Kikuchi, S.; Yoshida, S.; Sugawara, Y.; Yamada, W.;
Cheng, H.-M.; Fukui, K.; Sekine, K.; Iwakura, I.; Ikeno, T.;
Yamada, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2011, 84, 698.
(3) (a) Carini, D. J.; Ardecky, R. J.; Ensinger, C. L.; Pruitt, R.
R.; Wexler, P. C.; Wong, S.-M.; Huang, B. J.; Aungst, J. R.;
Timmermans, P. B. M. W. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1994, 4,
63. (b) Kawai, H.; Sakamoto, F.; Taguchi, M.; Kitamura,
M.; Sotomura, M.; Tsukamoto, G. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1991,
39, 1422. (c) Cascio, G.; Manghisi, E.; Porta, R.; Fregnan,
G. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 815. (d) Alexander, J.; Bindra,
D. S.; Glass, J. D.; Holahan, M. A.; Renyer, M. L.; Rork, G.
S.; Sitko, G. R.; Stranieri, M. T.; Stupienski, R. F.;
(13) Representative Experimental Data
4-Pentyl-5-phenyl-1,3-dioxol-2-one (2a)
Reaction time 24 h; yield 96%; 66.9 mg; colorless oil. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.91 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H), 1.37
(m, 4 H), 1.71 (m, 2 H), 2.69 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.37–7.48
(m, 5 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.9, 22.3, 24.8,
26.5, 31.1, 125.2, 125.6, 128.9, 129.0, 137.2, 139.2, 152.4.
IR (KBr): 2958, 2932, 2862, 1821, 1449, 1248, 1188, 1098,
1057, 1026, 977, 760, 692. ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for
C14H17O3+ [M + H]+: 233.1172; found: 233.1177.
(14) See the Supporting Information; similar isomerizations have
been observed by some groups, see: (a) Hashmi, A. S. K.;
Rudolph, M.; Schymura, S.; Visus, J.; Frey, W. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 4905. (b) Wong, V. H. L.; Andy Hor, T. S.; Hii,
K. K. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9272.
Veerapanane, H.; Cook, J. J. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 480.
(e) Houghton, T. J.; Tanaka, K. S. E.; Kang, T.; Dietrich, E.;
Lafontaine, Y.; Delorme, D.; Ferreira, S. S.; Viens, F.;
Arhin, F. F.; Sarmiento, I.; Lehoux, D.; Fadhil, I.; Laquerre,
K.; Liu, J.; Ostiguy, V.; Poirier, H.; Moeck, G.; Parr, T. R.
Jr.; Rafai Far, A. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 6955.
Synlett 2014, 25, 1178–1180
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York