ment of 12 was made through the lactone 10b, which was
directly correlated with its methylated counterpart 10a.
Scheme 3 illustrates the transition state model proposed
that the (E) enolate still exhibits a preferred addition to the
si face of methyl ketone 6. This suggests that either the steric
repulsion predicted by the polar Felkin-Nguyen model was
not sufficiently significant for the (E) enolate to reverse its
si face preference or that there exists another low energy
pathway that can accommodate the R-methoxy substituent
on the (E) enolate while still favoring si face addition to the
ketone. It is also worth noting that the assertion that there
should be a reversal in carbonyl face selectivity for enolate
14 is based on trends established for R-methyl substituted
aldehydes.9 Aldol addition studies to R-alkoxy aldehydes
reported by Heathcock10 also suggest that carbonyl face
reversal with enolates such as 14 may not be general for all
chiral aldehyde substrates.
Scheme 3. Asymmetric Induction and Felkin-Nguyen Model
The conversion of R-hydroxy lactone 10b to lactone
methyl ether 10a required methylation conditions that would
differentiate the 2′-secondary alcohol from the 4′ secondary
carbamate. Strongly basic conditions, such as sodium hydride
or sodium tert-butoxide, either epimerized the C2′ alcohol
stereocenter or opened the lactone ring. The addition of silver
oxide and methyl iodide to lactone 10b afforded only 40%
of the desired product at room temperature, and elevated
temperatures induced N-methylation of the carbamate. The
use of methyl triflate and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylpyridine
resulted in decomposition of the lactone. Meerwein’s reagent
(Me3O‚BF4) and proton sponge (N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-1,8-
naphthalenediamine) afforded less than 50% of the desired
product, and separation of the base from the polar product
was tedious. Fortunately, a combination of Meerwein’s
reagent and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylpyridine in dichlo-
romethane provided the desired product 10a in 82% yield
(Scheme 2).11
Two transformations remained to complete the synthesis
of callipeltose: formation of the cyclic carbamate and
reduction of the lactone to lactol (Scheme 4). Initial attempts
to form the cyclic carbamate followed by reduction of the
lactone resulted in preferential opening of the more reactive
cyclic carbamate. Thus, our attention turned toward lactone
reduction followed by formation of a stable glycoside
intermediate prior to carbamate cyclization. Diisobutylalu-
minum hydride reduction of lactone 10b to lactol 19 followed
by acidic methanolysis, however, did not provide the desired
pyranoside 20a but yielded the pyrrolidine derivative 20b
instead. (eq 6).
to explain the stereochemical outcome. The polar Felkin-
Nguyen model7 predicts that nucleophilic addition to the si
face of the methyl ketone 6 should be expected (eq 2). The
Zimmerman-Traxler transition state model8 suggests that
(Z) enolate addition to the methyl ketone should afford the
anti aldol adduct 12 (eq 3). Accordingly, the stereochemical
outcome of this transformation is in full accord with the
indicated models.
Rationalization of the stereochemical outcome of the aldol
addition of (E) enolate 14 to methyl ketone 6 is less
straightforward. On the basis of the polar Felkin-Nguyen
model, (E) enolate 14 should experience steric repulsion from
the threonine side chain in the Zimmerman-Traxler transi-
tion state (eq 4). Minimization of this unfavorable interaction
should have resulted in an anti Felkin addition of the (E)
enolate to the re face of methyl ketone 6 (eq 5). However,
the X-ray structure of syn aldol adduct 7 (Figure 2) reveals
This undesired lactol rearrangement was circumvented
using Rychnovsky’s one-pot lactone reduction-acylation
procedure.12 Lactone 10a was treated with diisobutylalumi-
num hydride, and the resulting reduction product, without
isolation, was treated with acetic anhydride, pyridine, and
DMAP to give the six-membered anomeric acetate 16 in 93%
yield and 9:1 anomeric ratio (Scheme 4). Addition of sodium
hydride transformed the N-Cbz group on acetate 16 into the
cyclic carbamate, while the benzyl alkoxide byproduct
(6) (a) Pearson, W. H.; Cheng, M.-C. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1353-
1355. (b) Pearson, W. H.; Cheng, M.-C. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 3176-
3178. (c) Pearson, W. H.; Hines, J. V. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 4235-
4237. (c) Comins, D. L.; Kuethe, J. T.; Lakner, F. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 2651-2652.
(7) One of our referees pointed out that the surname of author “Nguyen
Trong Anh" is actually Nguyen because surnames are listed first according
to Vietnamese custom. Therefore, we will refer to the polar model as the
Felkin-Nguyen model instead of the Felkin-Anh model. (a) Cherest, M.;
Felkin, H.; Prudent, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 2199. (b) Nguyen, T. A.;
Eisenstein, O. NouV. J. Chim. 1977, 1, 61-70. (c) Nguyen, T. A. Top.
Curr. Chem. 1980, 88, 146-162.
(9) For a discussion of (Z) enolate additions to chiral substituted
aldehydes, see: (a) Evans, D. A.; Nelson, J. V.; Taber, T. R. Top.
Stereochem. 1982, 13, 1-115. (b) Roush, W. R. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
4151-4157.
(10) Heathcock, C. H.; Young, S. D.; Hagan, J. P.; Pirrung, M. C.; White,
C. T.; VanDerveer, D. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 3846-3856.
(8) Zimmerman, H. E.; Traxler, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79,
1920-1923.
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 20, 2001
3135