L. Li et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 368–369 (2013) 24–30
25
esterification [14]. From the literature mentioned above, it could be
seen that the addition of rare earth element and other subgroup ele-
ment could enhance the activity and stability of SO42−/MxOy-based
solid acid. However, the dependence of the acidity and activity of
the catalyst on its texture property needs more research.
In the present work, we reported the preparation and char-
acterization of SO42−/TiO2-based solid acids promoted by Si and
lanthanide ion (Ln = La3+, Ce4+, Sm3+), and their application in the
esterification of itaconic acid. The effect of co-addition of Si and La3+
on the activity, structure and acidity of the catalysts was investi-
gated as well.
at 80 ◦C until being dried to powder. Then the materials were pow-
dered below 100 mesh, calcined in air at 400, 450, 500, 550 and
600 ◦C for 6 h to prepare SO42−/TiO2, respectively.
2.2.2. Ln∼SO42−/TiO2–SiO2
10 g mixture of Ti(SO4)2 and Na2SiO3 are dissolved in 90 g dis-
tilled water under vigorous stirring, and the molar ratio of Ti and Si
is 15:1, 20:1, 25:1, 30:1, 35:1, respectively. Through drop wise add
aqueous ammonia (28 wt.%) to adjust the pH value of the above
solution to the range of 9–10, then the solid is formed slowly.
After separated and washed with deionized water, the obtained
TiO2–SiO2 solid was dried at 100 ◦C for 24 h. An appropriate amount
of La2O3 (CeO2 or Sa2O3) was dissolved in 2 mol/L H2SO4 to prepare
2. Experimental
a mixture solution, and the concentration of La3+ ion (Ce4+ or Sa3+
)
was 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, 0.08, 0.09 mol/L, respectively. The TiO2–SiO2
was impregnated into the mixture solution for 2 h and the ratio was
15 g TiO2–SiO2 per 100 mL solution. After that the precipitate was
evaporated and calcined by the same way in SO42−/TiO2 prepa-
ration to obtain La3+∼SO42−/TiO2–SiO2, Ce4+∼SO42−/TiO2–SiO2,
Sa3+∼SO42−/TiO2–SiO2, respectively.
2.1. Regent and equipment
All materials, such as itaconic acid, methanol, 1-butanol, 2-
isooctanol, lanthanum oxide, cerium oxide, samarium oxide,
sulfuric acid, ammonia, aluminum chloride (AlCl3), zirconium
oxychloride (ZrOCl2), ferric chloride (FeCl3), titanium sulfate
(Ti(SO4)2), silver nitrate (AgNO3), sodium silicate (Na2SiO3),
sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), were
all purchased from Aldrich, and all materials were directly used
after drying without further purification.
2.3. Esterification of itaconic acid
2.3.1. Esterification of itaconic acid with methanol
A mixture of itaconic acid, methanol and catalyst was put into
100 mL autoclave and stirred at 120 ◦C. Various parameters, such
as the molar ratio of methanol to itaconic acid, amount of catalyst,
and reaction time, were varied to optimize the reaction conditions.
After the reaction, catalyst was separated by filtering.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of adsorbed NH3 (NH3-
FTIR) or pyridine (Py-FTIR) on the catalysts were recorded on a
NEXUS 670 FTIR spectrometer. Before measurement, the catalyst
sheets were evacuated at 200 ◦C for 2 h under vacuum of 10−2 Pa
and then cooled to ambient temperature. After NH3 or pyridine
adsorption for 30 min and evacuation at 100 ◦C for 1 h, IR spectra
were recorded. The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) of the cata-
lyst was carried out on a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer
using nickel filtered Cu K␣ radiation at 40 kV and 20 mA. The ther-
mal gravimetric analysis (DTA) data were obtained by a Setaram
Labsys TG (STA) in temperature range of 25–1000 ◦C and heat-
ing rate of 10 ◦C min−1 in N2 atmosphere. Total acidity of the
samples is determined by temperature-programmed desorption of
ammonia (NH3-TPD). Measurements are carried out by a DLUT-
1 automatic temperature programmed desorption apparatus. The
sample is treated at 500 ◦C in nitrogen flow for 120 min. Then the
temperature is reduced to 120 ◦C and keeps the sample in a flow of
NH3 for 60 min. The amount of desorbed NH3 is determined after
heating the sample up to 600 ◦C (heating rate of 10 ◦C min−1).
The aim products were analyzed by GC–MS (TRACE-GC-MS
chromatographer with an FID and a DB-17MS phenyl methyl
siloxanes capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm)). The temperature of
injector and transference line were maintained constant at 280 ◦C.
The temperature of the furnace was maintained at 180 ◦C for
30 min. The carrier gas was helium. The injection volume was
0.1 L. FT-IR (NEXUS470 FTIR spectrometer) was also used to ana-
lyze products in the range of 2000–800 cm−1, using KBr powder
containing ca. 1 wt.% of sample.
2.3.2. Esterification of itaconic acid with 1-butanol(2-isooctanol)
A mixture of itaconic acid, 1-butanol(2-isooctanol) and catalyst
the molar ratio of 1-butanol(2-isooctanol) to itaconic acid, amount
of catalyst and reaction time were varied to optimize the reaction
conditions. After the reaction, catalyst was separated by filtering.
Reaction equation was shown in Scheme 1.
2.4. Stability measurement
The reusability of catalyst was studied using the used catalyst in
the next consecutive reaction cycles. After being used eight times,
the catalyst was washed with water and calcined in a muffle furnace
at 500 ◦C for 3 h.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Choice of catlaysts
The catalytic activity of different catalysts in the esterification of
itaconic acid were examined and shown in Table 1. From Table 1, it
can be seen that SO42−/TiO2 and modified SO42−/TiO2 were of the
same catalytic activity as H2SO4, conversion of itaconic acid and the
yield of ester were both more than 90%. The La3+∼SO42−/TiO2–SiO2,
Ce4+∼SO42−/TiO2–SiO2 and Sa3+∼SO42−/TiO2–SiO2 exhibited the
as an example to research its catalytic stability in the synthe-
sis of dimethyl itaconate. The fresh SO42−/TiO2, La3+∼SO42−/TiO2
and La3+∼SO42−/TiO2–SiO2 exhibited similar catalytic activity
(Fig. 1). With the increasing repeated times of catalysts, the cat-
alytic activity of SO42−/TiO2 obviously diminished, and when
reuse in the fifth time, the conversion of itaconic acid was
below 60%. Compared with SO42−/TiO2, La3+∼SO42−/TiO2–SiO2
and La3+∼SO42−/TiO2 still maintained high catalytic activity, espe-
cially La3+∼SO42−/TiO2–SiO2. The Py-FTIR studies of the above
2.2. Catalysts preparation
2.2.1. SO42−/MxOy
The typical synthesis of SO42−/MxOy solid acid catalyst is
according to the paper by Hino et al. [15]. Take the synthesis
of SO42−/TiO2 as an example: 10 g Ti (SO4)2 is dissolved in 90 g
distilled water under vigorous stirring. Through drop wise add
aqueous ammonia (28 wt.%) to adjust the pH value of the above
solution to the range of 9–10, then the solid is formed slowly. After
separated and washed with deionized water, the obtained TiO2
solid was dried at 100 ◦C for 24 h. Take 2 g TiO2 and impregnate it
with 30 mL of 1 N H2SO4 for 2 h. The treated solid was evaporated