C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
allylation reaction was achieved.10 (3) Crotylation of benzaldehyde
led to a 5.5:1 ratio of anti to syn and >95% ee for both
diastereomers.11 Studies are currently underway to elucidate the
mechanism.12 Furthermore, the applications of TBOx in other
asymmetric catalysis will be reported in due course.
Table 2. TBOxCr(III)Cl-Catalyzed Addition of Other Allylic
Bromides to Aldehydes
Acknowledgment. Dedicated to Prof. H. Nozaki and Prof. T.
Hiyama for their pioneering work in this field. We thank the
National Science Foundation (NSF) for financial support of this
research.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
spectral data for all new compounds. This material is available free of
References
(1) (a) Okude, Y.; Hirano, S.; Hiyama, T.; Nozaki, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1977, 99, 3179-3181. (b) Hiyama, T.; Kimura, K.; Nozaki, H. Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 1981, 1037-1040. (c) Takai, K.; Kimura, K.; Kuroda, T.;
Hiyama, T.; Nozaki, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 5281-5284. (d) Takai,
K.; Kuroda, T.; Nakatukasa, S.; Oshima, K.; Nozaki, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1985, 5585-5588. (e) Fu¨rstner, A.; Shi, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
12349-12357. (f) Fu¨rstner, A.; Shi, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
2533-2534. (g) Fu¨rstner, A.; Wuchrer, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 76-
89.
a Isolated yield of a mixture of anti and syn product after chromatographic
purification. b Determined by 1H NMR of crude product. c Enantiomeric
excess was determined by chiral HPLC analysis. d EtOCH2CH2OEt was
used as solvent instead of DME. e The absolute configuration of the major
anti isomer was determined to be R,R.7 f The absolute configuration of the
major anti isomer was determined to be S,R.8
(2) Recent reviews: (a) Fu¨rstner, A. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 991-1045. (b)
Wessjohann, L. A.; Scheid, G. Synthesis 1999, 1, 1-36. (c) Avalos, M.;
Babiano, R.; Cintas, P.; Jimenez, J. L.; Palacios, J. C. Chem. Soc. ReV.
1999, 28, 169-177. (d) Takai, K.; Nozaki, H. Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B
2000, 76B, 123-131.
were obtained. Because aliphatic aldehydes are not as reactive as
aromatic aldehydes, the pinacol coupling reactions of aliphatic
aldehydes are slower. Due to this, not only allylbromide (entries
16, 19, 21, 23, and 25) but also allylchloride (entries 17, 20, 22,
24, and 26) could be applied to the NH allylation reaction of
different aliphatic aldehydes to afford homoallylic alcohols in good
yields and good enantioselectivities, albeit with longer reaction time.
The present catalyst system proved to be quite tolerable to changes
in steric effect (entries 8 and 10 in comparison to 3, entries 25 and
26 in comparison to 16) and in electron density effect (entries 5
and 6 for electron-withdrawing groups, entries 7-9 for electron-
donating groups in comparison to 3). We achieved good yields and
over 95% ee with other aryl aldehydes as well (entries 11-13).
Additionally, an R,â-unsaturated aldehyde also proved to be a good
substrate (entry 14).
To further explore the substrate scope, more allylic bromides
were used in the NH allylation of aldehydes. Surprisingly, the
observed diastereoselectivity of the crotylation of benzaldehyde was
high with a 4.4:1 ratio favoring anti-product in 84% yield with
97% ee for both anti and syn forms (entry 1, Table 2). The
crotylation of cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde gave out the homoallylic
alcohols with a 6.3:1 ratio of anti to syn in 73% yield with 96% ee
(anti form) and 97% ee (syn form) (entry 5). When the size of R
was decreased, lower diastereoselectivities were observed with
higher yield and similar enantioselectivities (entry 6 in comparison
to 5). More interestingly, when the size of R′ was increased, higher
diastereoselectivities were observed with only a slight decrease of
yields and enantioselectivities (entries 3 and 4 in comparison to
2). To the best of our knowledge, the observed diastereoselectivities
and the enantiomeric excesses for each diastereomer of those
aldehydes are the highest to date in an asymmetric crotylation using
a Cr(II)-based system.3g,m
(3) (a) Bandini, M.; Cozzi, P. G.; Melchiorre, P.; Umani-Ronchi, A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3357-3359. (b) Bandini, M.; Cozzi, P. G.;
Umani-Ronchi, A. Polyhedron 2000, 19, 537-539. (c) Bandini, M.; Cozzi,
P. G.; Umani-Ronchi, A. Chem. Commun. 2002, 919-927. (d) Choi, H.;
Nakajima, K.; Demeke, D.; Kang, F.; Jun, H.; Wan, Z.; Kishi, Y. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 4435-4438. (e) Lombardo, M.; Licciulli, S.; Morganti, S.;
Trombini, C. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1762-1763. (f) Berkessel, A.;
Menche, D.; Sklorz, C. A.; Schro˜der, M.; Paterson, I. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2003, 42, 1032-1035. (g) Inoue, M.; Suzuki, T.; Nakada, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1140-1141. (h) Suzuki, T.; Kinoshita, A.; Kawada,
H.; Nakada, M. Synlett 2003, 570-572. (i) Berkessel, A.; Schro˜der, M.;
Sklorz, C. A.; Tabanella, S.; Vogl, N.; Lex, J.; Neudo˜rfl, J. M. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 3050-3056. (j) Namba, K.; Kishi, Y. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 5031-5033. (k) Inoue, M.; Nakada, M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2977-
2980. (l) Kurosu, M.; Lin, M.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
12248-12249. (m) Lee, J.; Miller, J. J.; Hamilton, S. S.; Sigman, S. S.
Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1837-1839.
(4) Asymmetric allylations using a Cr(II)-based system not via a catalytic
process: (a) Cazes, B.; Verniere, C.; Gore´, J. Synth. Commun. 1983, 13,
73-79. (b) Chen, C.; Tagami, K.; Kishi, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
5386-5387. (c) Sugimoto, K.; Aoyagi, S.; Kibayashi, C. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 2322-2323.
(5) Takenaka, N.; Xia, G.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
13198-13199.
(6) By replacing TESCl with TMSCl or PhMe2SiCl, homoallylic alcohol with
lower yield and lower enantiomeric excesses was obtained.
(7) Wadamoto, M.; Ozasa, N.; Yanagisawa, A.; Yamamoto, H. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 5593-5601.
(8) Nishio, K.; Kobayashi, S. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 6620-6628.
(9) For example, refs 3g and 3m (90 and 94% ee for PhCHO, respectively)
in comparison to entry 4 in Table 1 (99% ee for PhCHO); refs 3g and 3m
(93 and 89% ee for c-C6H11CHO, respectively) in comparison to entry
18 in Table 1 (98% ee for c-C6H11CHO).
(10) For example, ref 3g (10 mol % CrCl3 and 30 mol % chiral ligand) and
ref 3m (5 mol % CrCl3 and 10 mol % chiral ligand) in comparison to
entry 1 in Table 1 (0.5 mol % TBOxCr(III)Cl).
(11) For example, ref 3m (2.3:1 ratio favoring anti-product with 91% ee for
the anti form and 95% ee for the syn form) in comparison to entries 1
and 2 in Table 2.
(12) The reaction proceeds through cis-â chromium complex via the possible
transition structures shown below.
In summary, TBOxCr(III)Cl was shown to efficiently catalyze
the asymmetric NH allylation reaction of both aromatic and aliphatic
aldehydes. (1) Excellent enantioselectivities (up to 99% ee) for the
NH allylation reaction of aldehydes were obtained.9 (2) The lowest
catalyst/substrate ratio (0.5 mol %) for an asymmetric catalytic NH
JA058454P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 8, 2006 2555