Communications
Organometallics, Vol. 18, No. 17, 1999 3259
F igu r e 1. ORTEP drawing of complex 7. Selected dis-
tances (Å) and angles (deg): Fe(1)-Fe(2), 2.515(2); Fe(3)-
Fe(4), 2.544(2); S(1)-Fe(1), 2.247(3); S(1)-Fe(3), 2.226(3);
Se-Fe(3), 2.391(2); Fe(1)-S(1)-Fe(2), 68.10(8); Fe(3)-
S(1)-Fe(4), 69.60(8); S(1)-Fe(1)-Fe(2), 55.92(7); S(1)-Fe-
(3)-Fe(4), 55.29(7); Fe(3)-Se-Fe(4), 64.19(5).
F igu r e 2. ORTEP drawing of complex 8. Selected dis-
tances (Å) and angles (deg): Fe(1)-Fe(2), 2.504(1); Fe(3)-
Fe(3a), 2.563(2); S(2)-Fe(1), 2.277(2); S(2)-Fe(3), 2.253(2);
Fe(1)-S(2)-Fe(2), 66.8(1); Fe(3)-S(2)-Fe(3a), 69.3(1); S(2)-
Fe(1)-Fe(2), 56.5(1); S(2)-Fe(3)-Fe(3a), 55.4(1).
of 9 was obtained if p-MeC6H4SeH was used instead of
t-BuSH.
Products 6 and 7 have been characterized by elemen-
tal and spectroscopic analyses;6 7 has been characterized
as well by X-ray diffraction analysis.7 Figure 1 repre-
sents the molecular structure of 7 with selected bond
lengths and angles. As seen in Figure 1, cluster 7 is a
chiral molecule, which consists of the two different
butterfly-shaped subcluster cores Fe(1)Fe(2)S(1)S(2) and
Fe(3)Fe(4)S(1)Se joined to a spiro type of µ4-S: i.e., the
S(1) atom. In addition, it can be seen that the two
substituents Me and p-MeC6H4 on the subclusters are
attached to S(2) and Se atoms by an equatorial bond
and each of the three CO’s attached to Fe atom is
terminal. Therefore, this structure is consistent with its
elemental and spectroscopic data and is similar to other
µ4-S and µ4-Se double clusters, such as [(µ-MeS)Fe2-
(CO)6]2(µ4-S),8 [(µ-EtS)Fe2(CO)6]2(µ4-S),4c [(µ-EtS)Fe2-
(CO)6]2(µ4-Se),5c and [(µ-p-MeC6H4Se)Fe2(CO)6]2(µ4-Se).9
Anions 5 have more interesting and useful synthetic
applications, as demonstrated by the following prepara-
tion of the novel triple butterfly cluster 8. Addition of
0.172 g (0.50 mmol) of 3 to a brown solution of ca. 1
mmol of the [Et3NH]+ salt of 4 (RE ) t-BuS) prepared
as described above resulted in formation of a brown-
green solution that was stirred at room temperature for
2 h. When this solution was cooled to -78 °C, 0.05 mL
(0.5 mmol) of SO2Cl2 was added and the solution turned
to red immediately. The mixture was warmed to room
temperature and stirred for an additional 2 h. Volatiles
were removed in vacuo, and the residue was subjected
to TLC. Petroleum ether eluted one major band, from
which 0.210 g (38%) of 8 was obtained. Similarly, 23%
Products 8 and 9 have been fully characterized by
combustion analysis and spectroscopic techniques.10 To
unambiguously confirm their structures, the X-ray
diffraction analysis for 8 was undertaken.11 Figure 2
shows the molecular structure of 8. As seen in Figure
2, 8 comprises the three butterfly-shaped Fe2S2 sub-
cluster cores Fe(1)Fe(2)S(1)S(2), Fe(3)Fe(3a)S(2)S(2a),
and Fe(1a)Fe(2a)S(1a)S(2a). It is unprecedented to have
two such µ4-S (S(2) and S(2a)) atoms. In addition, each
Fe atom has three terminal CO ligands, and the two
t-Bu groups are bonded to S(1) and S(1a) atoms by an
equatorial bond. This molecule is chiral, which has a
C2 axis passing through the two midpoints of Fe(3)-
Fe(3a) and S(2)‚‚‚S(2a). It is noteworthy that the
geometric parameters of the middle subcluster core are
somewhat different from those of the two identical side
subcluster cores. For example, the dihedral angle be-
tween Fe(3)-Fe(3a)-S(2) and Fe(3)-Fe(3a)-S(2a) (73.7°)
is less than that between Fe(1)-Fe(2)-S(1) and Fe(1)-
Fe(2)-S(2) or Fe(1a)-Fe(2a)-S(1a) and Fe(1a)-Fe(2a)-
S(2a) (86.1°), and the bond length of Fe(3)-Fe(3a)
(2.563(2) Å) is longer than that of Fe(1)-Fe(2) or Fe-
(1a)-Fe(2a) (2.504(1) Å). However, the basic geometric
parameters of this triple-butterfly cluster complex are
still comparable with those of double-butterfly
clusters.4c,5c,8,9
(6) Product 6: mp 150 °C dec; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.44 (s, 9H,
t-(CH3)3C), 2.14 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm; IR (KBr disk): 2082 (vs), 2052 (vs),
2034 (vs), 1984 (s), 1979 (s), 1972 (s), 1967 (m) cm-1. Anal. Calcd for
C17H12Fe4O12S3: C, 28.04; H, 1.65. Found: C, 28.06; H, 1.67. Product
7: mp 154 °C dec; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.17 (s, 3H, SCH3), 2.29 (s, 3H,
ArCH3), 7.12 (q, AA′BB′, J ) 7.5 Hz, 4H, C6H4); 77Se NMR (CDCl3,
Me2Se) δ 248.04 ppm; IR (KBr disk) 2082 (m), 2052 (s), 2032 (vs), 1993
(vs), 1970 (s) cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C20H10Fe4O12S2Se: C, 29.68; H, 1.24.
Found: C, 29.50; H, 1.66.
(7) X-ray data: red crystals of 7 from CH2Cl2/hexane, triclinic (P1h),
a ) 8.782(2) Å, b ) 9.093(3) Å, c ) 19.514(7) Å, R ) 86.98(2)°, â )
86.42(2)°, λ ) 68.6(2)°, Z ) 2, R ) 0.058, GOF ) 1.60.
(8) Coleman, J . M.; Wojcicki, A.; Pollick, P. J . Dahl, L. F. Inorg.
Chem. 1967, 6, 1236.
At present, we are not clear concerning the reaction
mechanism for production of 8 and 9. However, on the
(10) Product 8: mp 180 °C dec; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.48 (s, 18H,
2(CH3)3C) ppm; IR (KBr disk) 2070 (s), 2041 (vs), 1989 (vs), 1922 (s)
cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C26H18Fe6O18S4: C, 28.87; H, 1.68. Found: C,
28.84; H, 1.71. Product 9: mp 170 °C dec; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.31 (s,
6H, 2ArCH3), 7.17 (q, AA′BB′, J ) 8.3 Hz, 8H, 2C6H4); 77Se NMR
(CDCl3, Me2Se) δ 249.78 ppm; IR (KBr disk): 2085 (m), 2069 (s), 2055
(s), 2038 (vs), 2022 (s), 2006 (s), 1992 (vs) cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C32H14
Fe6O18S2Se2: C, 30.91; H, 1.14. Found: C, 30.56; H, 1.44.
-
(11) X-ray data: red crystals of 8 from CH2Cl2/hexane, monoclinic
(C2/c), a ) 27.454(5) Å, b ) 9.303(2) Å, c ) 20.136(4) Å, â ) 128.16-
(3)°, Z ) 4, R ) 0.044, S ) 0.8.
(9) Song, L.-C.; Hu, Q.-M.; Yan, C.-G.; Wang, R.-J .; Mak, T. C. W.
Acta Crystallogr. 1996, C52, 1357.