9152
J . Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 9152-9156
Th e Aza -[2,3]-Wittig Sigm a tr op ic Rea r r a n gem en t of Acyclic
Am in es: Scop e a n d Lim ita tion s of Silicon Assista n ce
J ames C. Anderson,* Alice Flaherty, and Martin E. Swarbrick
School of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.
j.anderson@nottingham.ac.uk
Received September 4, 2000
The inclusion of a C-2 trialkylsilyl substituent into allylic amine precursors allows the base-induced
aza-[2,3]-Wittig sigmatropic rearrangement to proceed in excellent yield and diastereoselectivity.
The rearrangement precursors require a carbonyl-based nitrogen protecting group that must be
stable to the excess of strong base required for the reaction. The N-Boc and N-benzoyl group are
very good at stabilizing the product anion and initiating deprotonation. The migrating groups (G)
need to stabilize the intial anion by resonance and require G-CH3 pKa > 22 in order for the initial
anion to be reactive enough for rearrangement. Products 7, 20b-d ,f,g, and 23 are formed with
high (10-20:1) anti diastereoselectivity. Product 23 containing the morpholine amide group is useful
for preparing other carbonyl derivatives.
In tr od u ction
rearrangement proceeds with inversion of configuration
at the lithium-bearing carbon,7 in accord with precedent
in the oxygen series.8 We characterized the first acyclic
example of the aza-[2,3]-Wittig sigmatropic rearrange-
ment, and from the outset argued that the resulting aza
anion from the rearrangement needed to be stabilized
in some way to provide some thermodynamic driving
force for the reaction (eq 2, X ) H).9 The Boc protecting
group seemed to achieve the best results, although
Manabe also showed the efficacy of the tetramethylphos-
phordiamide group, with similar substrates, in terms of
yield.10 Our first example proved to be very limited, and
it was only after incorporating an anion stabilizing group
at the C-2 position of our substrate, to try and stabilize
the transition state and dictate diastereoselection, did
the reaction become more versatile, high yielding and
diastereoselective (eq 2, X ) SiMe3).11 Among the anion
stabilizing groups surveyed,11b the silyl group provided
the best rate acceleration and diastereocontrol in this
rearrangement.
Since the first observation of the [2,3]-Wittig sigmat-
ropic rearrangement (eq 1, X ) O) in only 1960,1 this
rearrangement has developed into a synthetically power-
ful and highly stereoselective carbanion rearrangement.2
Despite the seemingly trivial replacement of oxygen for
nitrogen, the aza analogue (eq 1, X ) N) remained under
developed until the beginning of the 1990s.
When trying to prepare the 3-lithio derivative of
1-benzyl-4-vinyl-2-azetidinone, Durst et al. characterized
the first example of an aza-[2,3]-Wittig rearrangement
and verified that the driving force for the rearrangement
was the relief of ring strain in going from a four- to a
seven-membered ring.3 Over 20 years later, this seminal
observation was capitalized upon first by Somfai4 and
then Coldham5 by the use of N-substituted vinylaziri-
dines as rearrangement precursors. These facile rear-
rangements were again driven by the relief of ring strain,
this time in going from an aziridine to a tetrahydropy-
ridine. The anionic aza-[2,3]-Wittig rearrangement of
acyclic precursors, which do not have a latent thermo-
dynamic driving force, have proven to be considerably
more difficult. Initial attempts were thwarted by the
competing [1,2] rearrangement pathway,6 although the
most successful attempt verified that the aza-[2,3]-Wittig
(6) (a) Reetz, M. A.; Schinzer, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 3485. (b)
Broka, C. A.; Shen, T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2981. (c) Murata,
Y.; Nakai, T.Chem. Lett. 1990, 2069. (d) Coldham, I. J . Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 1275. (e) Gulea-Purcarescu, M.; About-J audet,
E.; Collignon, N.; Saquet, M.; Masson, S. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 2075.
(7) Gawley, R. E.; Zhang, Q.; Campagna, S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 11817.
(8) (a) Verner, E. J .; Cohen, T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 375.
(b) Hoffmann, R.; Bru¨ckner, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992,
31, 647. (c) Tomooka, K.; Igarashi, T.; Watanabe, M.; Nakai, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5795.
(9) Anderson, J . C.; Siddons, D. C.; Smith, S. C.; Swarbrick, M. E.
J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 1835.
(10) Manabe, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2491.
(11) (a) Anderson, J . C.; Siddons, D. C.; Smith, S. C.; Swarbrick, M.
E. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4820. (b) Anderson, J . C.; Smith, S. C.;
Swarbrick, M. E. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 1517. (c)
Anderson, J . C.; Roberts, C. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 159. (d)
Anderson, J . C.; Dupau, P.; Siddons, D. C.; Smith, S. C.; Swarbrick,
M. E. Tetrahedron lett. 1998, 39, 2649.
(1) Cast, J .; Stevens, T. S.; Holmes, J . J . Chem. Soc. 1960, 3521.
(2) For the most recent review, see: Nakai, T.; Mikami, K. Org.
React. 1994, 46, 105.
(3) Durst, T.; Elzen, R. V. D.; LeBelle, M. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1972,
94, 9261.
(4) (a) Åman, J .; Somfai, P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9781. (b)
Åhman, J .; J arevång, Somfai, P. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8148 and
references therein.
(5) (a) Coldham, I.; Collis, A. J .; Mould, R. J .; Rathmell, R. E.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3557. (b) Coldham, I.; Collis, A. J .; Mould,
R. J .; Rathmell, R. E. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1995, 2739.
(12) (a) Wu, Y.-D.; Houk, K. N.; Marshall, J . A. J . Org. Chem. 1990,
55, 1421 and references there in. See also: (b) Mikami, K.; Uchida,
T.; Hirano, T.; Wu, Y.-D.; Houk, K. N. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 5917.
(13) Ishikawa, A.; Uchiyama, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 2415-8.
(14) Anderson, J . C.; Flaherty, A. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
2000, 3025-7.
10.1021/jo0056343 CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/18/2000