Organic Process Research & Development 2011, 15, 301–304
Manufacture of (5Z,8Z,11Z,13E)(15S)-15-Hydroxyeicosa-5,8,11,13-tetraenoic Acid
Sodium Salt for Clinical Trials
Raymond E. Conrow,‡ Paul Harrison,†,§ Mark Jackson,*,† Shaun Jones,† Christel Kronig,† Ian C. Lennon,†,⊥ and
Shaun Simmonds†
Dr. Reddy’s Custom Pharmaceutical SerVices, Chirotech Technology Limited, Unit 162 Cambridge Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge CB4 0GH, U.K., and Alcon Laboratories, 6201 South Freeway, Fort Worth, Texas 76134, United States
Abstract:
reaction mixture at the start, allowing in situ reduction of the
hydroperoxide and access to 15(S)-HETE directly. The major
problem of this process is the low volume efficiency (0.5 g/L).
The oxidation can be achieved much more rapidly and with
greater volume efficiency if it is carried out under increased
oxygen pressure, typically 35 psi.4 However, in this procedure
the isolation of the hydroperoxide is very dilute (<1 g/L). The
hydroperoxide was reduced using triphenylphosphine, and
15(S)-HETE was isolated as the methyl ester derivative after
treatment with diazomethane. From our literature assessment
we decided that a biooxidation process would be best, but none
of these methods could be used directly without further
development. Therefore, we set out to devise a modified
biooxidation process to produce batches of 15(S)-HETE sodium
salt.
A robust synthesis of (5Z,8Z,11Z,13E)(15S)-15-hydroxyeicosa-
5,8,11,13-tetraenoic acid (15(S)-HETE) sodium salt was established,
utilising a biooxidation process. Treatment of arachidonic acid with
soybean lipoxidase in 0.1 M sodium tetraborate buffer under
oxygen pressure resulted in formation of the hydroperoxide, 15(S)-
HPETE. Addition of sodium borohydride to the reaction mixture
reduced the hydroperoxide to 15(S)-HETE, which was then
purified by column chromatography. 15(S)-HETE sodium salt was
prepared by treatment of an ethanol solution of HETE with
aqueous sodium hydrogen carbonate. Multiple 10-g batches of
15(S)-HETE sodium salt with >98% enantiomeric excess and
>98% chemical purity were prepared to support clinical trials.
Introduction
Results and Discussion
(5Z,8Z,11Z,13E)(15S)-15-Hydroxyeicosa-5,8,11,13-tetraeno-
ic acid (15(S)-HETE, Icomucret) has been in clinical trials for
the treatment of dry-eye syndrome.1 Chirotech was required to
develop a robust synthesis and manufacture several 10 g batches
of 15(S)-HETE sodium salt to support these clinical trials. Due
to the high potency of this compound, only small volumes of
the active ingredient were required. The sodium salt was
preferred to the acid due to improved stability in solution.
Our initial literature survey showed that 15(S)-HETE can
be prepared by a variety of synthetic organic routes. For
example, Nicolaou has reported a synthesis where the correct
stereochemistry is introduced by the coupling of a single
enantiomer vinyl bromide with a terminal acetylene.2 The
overall yield is a very respectable 25% but due to the number
of steps, 15(S)-HETE is most conveniently prepared biosyn-
thetically from arachidonic acid. In the procedure described by
Baldwin, arachidonic acid was treated with soybean lipoxidase
under one atmosphere of oxygen.3 The intermediate hydroper-
oxide was reduced by treatment with sodium borohydride in
ethanol. Alternatively, sodium borohydride can be added to the
We decided to follow the biooxidation process of Iacazio,4
using 35 psi oxygen pressure. After the biooxidation we
investigated methods to improve the reduction of 15(S)-HPETE
and isolation of 15(S)-HETE. Scheme 1 shows the biooxidation
of arachidonic acid and preparation of 15(S)-HETE sodium salt.
The first small-scale experiments were carried out in a 50-
mL pressure vessel equipped with a glass liner, allowing the
input of 1 mmol of substrate in 10 mL of solvent. The following
variables were investigated to ensure a robust process, capable
of manufacturing several 10-g batches to the same high quality.
Temperature. Temperature was found to be a critical factor,
with more side products observed at higher temperature (10
°C) and a slight drop in enantiomeric excess observed. To ensure
high enantiomeric excess the reaction mixture was cooled to
0-3 °C before commencing the oxidation and maintained below
5 °C throughout the reaction.
Concentration. An attempt was made to increase the
volume efficiency of the reaction, but the reaction at 50 g/L
was slower and gave less pure product. At 20 g/L a relatively
clean reaction was observed. Further dilution would be expected
to give an even cleaner reaction; however, 20 g/L was chosen
so we could manufacture 10-g batches in a 2-L pressure vessel.
This still represented a significant improvement on what had
been achieved previously.
* pjackson@drreddys.com.
† Dr. Reddy’s Custom Pharmaceutical Services.
‡ Alcon Laboratories.
§ Current address: Nice-Pak UK, Aber Park, Flint CH6 5EX, U.K.
⊥ Current address: Chiral Quest Corp. Trinity House, Cambridge Business
Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge CB4 0WZ, U.K.
(1) Schneider, L. W.; Conrow, R. E.; Gamache, D. A.; Pasquine, T.; Yanni,
J. M.; Bhagat, H. G. Chem. Abstr. 2001, 134, 366731. U.S. Patent
6,429,227 B1, 2002.
Reaction Time. The yield was lower when the reaction
mixture was left under oxygen pressure for an extended period.
Polar impurities resulting from further reaction of the hydro-
(2) Nicolaou, K. C.; Ladduwahetty, T.; Elisseou, E. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1985, 1580–1581.
(3) Baldwin, J. E.; Davies, D. I.; Hughes, L.; Gutteridge, N. J. A. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1979, 115–121.
(4) Martini, D.; Buono, G.; Iacazio, G. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 9062–
9064.
10.1021/op100244n 2011 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 12/02/2010
Vol. 15, No. 1, 2011 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
301