B.M. Chandra Shekara et al. / Journal of Catalysis 290 (2012) 101–107
107
4. Conclusions
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Microwave heating was found to be superior to conventional
heating in all aspects of the solventless acylation of p-cresol with
different carboxylic acids over BEA zeolite. Microwave-heated reac-
tions resulted in higher conversions of carboxylic acids with the for-
mation of ester through O-acylation as the primary product
followed by the Fries rearrangement to form ortho-hydroxy ketone.
Present study showed that lower conversion observed under con-
ventional heating was due to initial inhibition of O-acylation and
catalyst deactivation. p-Cresol shows low heat-up times in the
MW-heated reaction and is chiefly responsible for heating up of
the reaction mixture. The preferential adsorption of carboxylic acid,
which is known to be responsible for coke precursor formation, is
probably affected by the heat-up energy released by p-cresol to
the medium. This might have prevented the initial inhibition of O-
acylation reaction as well as catalyst deactivation and allowed the
catalyst to function with maximum activity and increased stability.
Conversion of ester
Ketone
HA formed
PC formed
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Reaction time, h
Fig. 11. Fries rearrangement of p-cresyl hexanoate versus reaction time under
conventional heating. Reaction condition: catalyst amount, 0.5 g; p-cresyl hexano-
ate, 10 mmol; temperature, 463 K.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Principal and the Governing Council of
Bangalore Institute of Technology for the facilities provided.
Thanks are due to Süd chemie India Pvt Ltd. for providing zeolite
sample. The authors would like to extend their thanks to Prof.
PVK, BU for TGA and ATR facilities.
Table 3
Time required to reach 373 K when 30 mmol of compound was heated at a constant
MW power of 1000 W.
Compound Time taken to
reach 373 K (s)
Compound
Time taken to
reach 373 K (s)
References
Acetic acid 20
Decanoic acid
p-Cresol
116
17
[1] M.G. Franck, J.W. Stadelhofer, in: Industrial Aromatic Chemistry, Springer,
Berlin/Heidelberg, 1987.
[2] H. van Koningsveld, J.J. Scheele, J.C. Jansen, Acta Crystallogr. C 43 (1987) 294.
[3] A. Corma, Chem. Rev. 95 (1995) 559.
[4] P. Marion, R. Jacquot, S. Ratton, M. Guisnet, in: M. Guisnet, J.P. Gilson (Eds.),
Zeolites for Cleaner Technologies, Imperial College Press, London, 2002, p. 281.
[5] J.B. Higgins, R.B. LaPierre, J.L. Schlenker, A.C. Rohrman, J.D. Wood, G.T. Kerr, W.J.
Rohrbaugh, Zeolites 8 (1988) 446.
[6] Jacobus C. Jansen, Edward J. Creyghton, Swie Lan Njo, Henk van Koningsveld,
Herman van Bekkum, Catal. Today 38 (1997) 205.
Propanoic
acid
25
31
49
80
Butyric
acid
Water
12
94
17
Hexanoic
acid
BEA zeolite (4 g)
Octanoic
acid
p-Cresol + Carboxylic
acid + BEA zeolite
[7] Giovanni Sartori, Raimondo Maggi, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) PR181.
[8] P. Botella, A. Corma, J.M. Lopez-Nieto, S. Valencia, R. Jacquot, J. Catal. 195
(2000) 161.
[9] J.M. Escola, M.E. Davis, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 214 (2001) 111.
[10] Libor Cerveny, Katerina Mikulcova, Jiri Cejka, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 223 (2002) 65.
[11] U. Freese, F. Heinrich, F. Roessner, Catal. Today 49 (1999) 237.
[12] Dhanashri P. Sawant, S.B. Halligudi, Catal. Commun. 5 (2004) 659.
[13] C. Guignard, V. Pedron, F. Richard, R. Jacquot, M. Spagnol, J.M. Coustard, G.
Perot, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 234 (2002) 79.
[14] P. Andy, J. Garcia-Martinez, G. Lee, H. Gonzalez, C.W. Jones, M.E. Davis, J. Catal.
192 (2000) 215.
[15] Vasco F.D. Alvaro, Amadeu F. Brigas, Eric G. Derouane, Joao P. Lourenco, Bruna
S. Santos, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 305 (2009) 100.
Table 4
Effect of heat-up time on the conversion of hexanoic acid.
Time to reach 463 K
Reaction time at 463 K (min)
Conversion of HA (%)
98 s
5
5
5
5
48
48
48
48
5 min
15 min
35 min
Reaction condition: Catalyst amount, 0.5 g; Mole ratio PC: HA, 2:1; temperature,
463 K. max MW power, 1000 W.
[16] C.L. Padro, C.R. Apesteguy, Catal. Today 107–108 (2005) 258.
[17] A.J. Hoefnagel, H. van Bekkum, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 97 (1993) 87.
[18] Mario G. Clerici, Top. Catal. 13 (2000) 373.
[19] E. Heitling, F. Roessner, E. van Steen, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 216 (2004) 65.
[20] A.E.W. Beers, J.A. van Bokhoven, K.M. de Lathouder, F. Kapteijn, J.A. Moulijn, J.
Catal. 218 (2003) 239.
[21] C. Oliver Kappe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 (2004) 6250.
[22] J.P. Tierney, P. Lidström (Eds.), Microwave Assisted Organic Synthesis,
Blackwell, Oxford, 2005.
[23] A. Loupy (Ed.), Microwaves in Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006.
[24] G. Bond, J.A. Gardner, R.W. McCabe, D.J. Shorrock, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 278
(2007) 1.
[25] Hiroshi Yamashita, Yumi Mitsukura, Hiroko Kobashi, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
327 (2010) 80.
[26] Matteo L.M. Bonati, Richard W. Joyner, Michael Stockenhuber, Micropor.
Mesopor. Mater. 104 (2007) 217.
[27] L.M. Jackman, M.M. Petrei, B.D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 (1991) 3451.
[28] B. Chiche, A. Finiels, C. Gauthier, P. Geneste, J. Org. Chem. 51 (1986) 2128.
[29] S.G. Wagholikar, P.S. Niphadkar, S. Mayadevi, S. Sivasanker, Appl. Catal. A Gen.
317 (2007) 250.
[30] Baodong Wang, George Manos, J. Catal. 250 (2007) 121.
[31] J.P. Marques, I. Gener, P. Ayrault, J.C. Bordado, J.M. Lopes, F. Ramoa Ribeiro, M.
Guisnet, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 60 (2003) 251.
[32] D. Rohan, C. Canaff, P. Magnoux, M. Guisnet, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 129 (1998) 69.
[33] E.A. Gunnewegh, R.S. Downing, H. van Bekkum, L. Bonneviot, S. Kaliaguine, A
refined tool for designing catalytic sites, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 97 (1995) 447.
surface. The fact that no generation of coke material in the case of
microwave heating leads one to say that the interaction of reactant
molecules on the surface of the catalyst is certainly influenced by
the method of heating.
In conventionally heated reaction, initial inhibition and coke
formation are primarily observed in the O-acylation reaction,
where both p-cresol and carboxylic acid are involved. It is reported
that one of the main reasons for initial inhibition of the reaction is
due to preferential adsorption of carboxylic acid [33]. p-Cresol is
chiefly responsible for heating up of the reaction mixture as no-
ticed by its low heat-up time. Consequently, the heat-up energy
of p-cresol subsequently released to the medium might be affect-
ing the adsorption of the carboxylic acid. This is probably respon-
sible for the suppression of coke precursor formation on the
surface of the catalyst. Due to this, the catalyst exhibits deactiva-
tion-free behavior. The role of the catalyst surface in this needs fur-
ther investigation.