conditions providing the enantiopure compound 13 in 72%
yield. An alternative procedure utilizing of MgBr2 OEt was
3
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Advanced Intermediates 29À31 and
Failed Plan to Synthesize Key Products 27 and 28
used to synthesize anti-compound 14 in excellent diaster-
eoselectivity (dr =28:1).13 Compound 14 was protected
with TBS-group and then both 13 and 15 were reduced to
16 and 17 respectively using lithium borohydride. Iodina-
tion of alcohol 16 followed by SAMP-hydrazone14 alkyla-
tion and subsequent acid catalyzed hydrolysis led to the
enantioselective construction of (2S,4R) aldehyde 23 in
moderate yield but in high enantioselectivity (93% ee).
Several conditions were tried to couple (2S,4R) aldehyde
23 to 2,4-dihydroxy pyridine, without any success, due to
the epimerization of the sensitive R-positioned methyl
group. This setback led us to modify our strategy to target
the more easily accessible R-methyl diasteromeric mixture
of 23 as the coupling partner of the 2,4-dihydroxy pyridine
compound. Asa result, oxidation of16and 17to19and 20,
respectively, followed by HornerÀEmmons reaction with
triethyl-2-phosphonopropionate afforded the desired
alkenes,15 which were selectively reduced to 22 and 24 by
using nickel chloride and sodium borohydride.16 Further
reduction using DIBAL gave the monounsaturated alco-
hols, which were directly oxidized to the desired diaster-
eomeric aldehydes 23 and 25 by PDC oxidation.
The best conditions found for the coupling reaction
between 2,4-dihydroxy pyridine and 23 or 25 involved
heating both components using microwave irradiation in
the presence of piperidine as a base at 160 °C for 10 min as
shown in Scheme 2. Under these conditions none of the
cyclized products 27 and 28 were obtained, as reported for
the total synthesis of pyridoxatin and leporin.7 Instead, the
only isolable products were diasteroisomeric mixtures of
compounds 29 and 30 along with unreacted 2,4-dihydroxy
pyridine and dimerized products.17
these results, we assumed that the steric constraints imposed
by intermediate 26 play the most important role in its inability
to undergo an intramolecular DielsÀAlder reaction.
With compounds 29 and 30 in hand, the stage was set for
developing appropriate selective CÀC reactions in order to
access the structural diversity of the pyridone family. In the
beginning, we tested the possibility of an inverse 1,5-hydride
shift that would lead to the key intermediate quinone 26
which, probably under different reaction conditions, may
lead to 27 or 28. Interestingly, when compound 29 was
heated at 160 °C for several hours in the presence or absence
of base, only a dimeric pyridone compound19 was isolated
along with extented decomposed byproducts.
In an effort to explain the inability of aldehyde 23 to
undergo an intramolecular DielsÀAlder reaction, we pre-
pared aldehydes 32 and 33.18 Interestingly, these compounds
reacted cleanly to give cyclized products 34 and 35 in a 4:1 and
3.2:1 syn:anti mixture of diastereoisomers. On the basis of
Our explanation for the latter was a retro-Knoevenagel
reaction leading to an excess of 2,4-dihydroxy pyridine in
the reaction solution. A closer look reveals a retro-1,5-
hydride shift to form intermediate 26, which then reacted
with the formed 2,4-dihydroxy pyridine.
We hypothesized that this process could be advantageous
if an internal nucleophile was used to capture the formed
intermediate. Thus, when compound 31 was heated to
110 °C for 2 days in benzene, compound 37 was isolated
as a sole product in 66% yield (Scheme 3). Compound 37
represents the core structure of septoriamycin A.
(10) Boeckman, K., Jr.; Pero, J. E.; Boehmler, D. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 11032–11033.
(11) Evans, D. A.; Dow, R. L.; Shih, T. L.; Takacs, J. M.; Zahler, R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5290–5313.
(12) Cage, J. R.; Evans, D. A. Org. Syn. 1990, 68, 83–85.
(13) (a) Evans, D. A.; Tedrow, J. S.; Shaw, J. T.; Downey, C. W. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 392–393. (b) Diastereomeric ratio determined
by GLC. (c) For reason of comparison, syn-aldol products have also
been obtained by reacting aldehyde 12 with (R)-oxazolidinone propio-
nate and dibutylborontriflate. See Supporting Information for spectral
data.
After extended experimentation it was found that com-
pound 30, bearing the protected hydroxy group can also be
(14) SAMP (S-1-amino-2(methoxymethyl)pyrrolidine: Enders, D.;
€
Nubling, C.; Schubert, H. Liebigs Ann. 1997, 1089–1100.
(15) A 1.5:1 E,Z mixture of alkenes was obtained from compound 19
in contrast with the E-selective formation when compound 20 was used.
See Supporting Information for more details.
(19) The isolation of dimeric product 44 was persistent in every
conditions used in the coupling reaction.
(16) Several other conditions were tried leading either to isomeriza-
tion of the remaining double bond or to unreacted starting material.
Nickel chloride and sodium borohydride reduction according to: Ha-
nessian, S.; Grillo, A. T. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 1049–1057.
(17) Several conditions concerning different bases or acids were
examined under various temperatures. The same products were always
obtained varying from 30 to 55% yield. Heating under regular condi-
tions provided extented decomposition.
(18) For more experimental details, please see the Supporting In-
formation provided.
4594
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 17, 2011