103
DUAL EFFECT OF NUCLEOTIDES ON P2Y RECEPTORS
of these domains was proposed to be located outside of the TM REFERENCES
(
)
1. Barnard, E. A., Simon, J., and Webb, T. E. 1997 Nucleotide receptors
segments and was formed by the extracellular loops 2 and 3,
whereas the other proposed binding domain was located within
the TM core. The former binding was calculated to be weaker
and was hypothesised to function to move an ATP molecule into
in the nervous system. An abundant component using diverse transduction
mechanisms. Mol. Neurobiol. 15, 103 129.
2. Ralevic, V., and Burnstock, G. 1998 Receptors for purines and pyrim-
idines. Pharmacol. Rev. 50, 413 492.
3. Barnard, E. A. 1997 Protein structures in receptor classi cation. Ann. N.Y.
Acad. Sci. 812, 14 28.
–
(
)
–
(
)
the functional strong binding site 13 . These domains may well
correspond to the agonistic and antagonistic sites predicted by
the two-site receptor model.
(
)
–
¨
(
)
4. Jarv, J., Toomela, T., and Karelson, E. 1993 Dual effect of carbachol on
–
the muscarinic receptor. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 30, 649 654.
The theoretical analysis of muscarinic receptor interaction
with speci c ligands has also suggested distinct locations of ag-
Ê
+
¨
(
)
5. Jarv, J., Hautala, R., and Akerman, K. E. O. 1995 Dual effect of muscarinic
receptor agonists on Ca2 mobilization in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells.
(
)
(
)
onist carbachol and antagonist N -methylscopolamine mole-
–
Eur. J. Pharmacol. 291, 43 50.
(
)
6. Webb, T. E., and Barnard, E. A. 1999 Molecular biology of P2Y receptors
(
)
cules on the receptor 14 . Given that variations of structure
–
expressed in the nervous system. Prog. Brain Res. 120, 23 31.
7. Ayyanathan, K., Webb, T. E., Sandhu, A. K., Athwal, R. S., Barnard, E. A.,
and Kunapuli, S. P. 1996 Cloning and chromosomal localization of the
human P2Y1 purinoceptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 218, 783
of classical muscarinic agonists and antagonists have revealed
rather different structure activityrelationships for these ligands,
the appropriate binding sites should possess different patterns,
thereby explaining the existence of very potent and highly
–
(
)
–
788.
¨
(
)
8. Jarv, J. 1995 A model of non-exclusive binding of agonist and antagonist
(
)
selective ligands of both types of activity 15 .
–
on G-protein coupled receptors. J. Theor. Biol. 175, 577 582.
9. Simon, J., Webb, T. E., King, B. F., Burnstock, G., and Barnard, E. A. 1995
Characterisation of a recombinant P2Y purinoceptor. Eur. J. Pharmacol.
291, 281 289.
On the other hand, the data listed in Table 1 reveal that vari-
ation in ligand structure resulted in rather similar changes in
Kagon and Kantag for the nucleotides. Thus the putative binding
sites on the P2Y receptors seem to possess rather close speci-
city patterns, presumably dominated by the phosphate groups.
This may be one of the reasons why the discovery of selec-
tive and potent antagonists for these receptors has been elu-
sive for so long. We hope that this information about the puta-
tive antagonistic sites may be useful for development of these
studies.
(
)
–
10. Nicholas, R. A., Watt, W. C., Lazarowski, E. R., Li, Q., and Harden, T. K.
(
)
1996 Uridine nucleotide selectivity of three phospholipase C-activating
P2 receptors: identi cation of a UDP-selective, a UTP-selective, and an
ATP-and UTP-speci c receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 50, 224 229.
–
¨
(
)
11. Sak, K., Webb, T. E., Samuel, K., Kelve, M., and Jarv, J. 1999 Only
pyrimidinoceptors are functionally expressed inmouse neuroblastoma cell
lines. Mol. Cell Biol. Res. Commun. 1, 203 208.
12. Szabadi, E. 1977 A model of two functionally antagonistic receptor pop-
–
(
)
–
ulations activated by the same agonist. J. Theor. Biol. 69, 101 112.
(
)
13. Moro, S., Hoffmann, C.,and Jacobson, K. A. 1999 Role of the extracellular
loops of G protein-coupled receptors in ligand recognition: a molecular
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
–
modeling study of the human P2Y1 receptor. Biochemistry 38, 3498 3507.
(
)
This work was supported by the EU Inco-Copernicus Grant
14. Fanelli, F., Menziani, M. C., and Benedetti, P. G. 1995 Molecular dynam-
ics simulations of m3-muscarinic receptor activation and QSAR analysis.
(
)
IC 15-CT96-0919 DG 12-CDPE , and by the Wellcome Trust.
–
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11, 1465 1477.
¨
(
We thank Kulli Samuel Institute of Chemical Physics and Bio-
¨
(
)
15. Jarv, J. 1992 Neurotoxic agents interacting with the muscarinic acetyl-
)
physics, Tallinn, Estonia for cultivation of the cells and Gerda
choline receptor. In Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol. 102,
Selective Neurotoxicity Herken, H., and Hucho, F., eds , pp. 659 680,
(
)
Raidaru Institute of Chemical Physics, Tartu, Estonia for chro-
matographic analysis of nucleotides.
–
(
)
Springer-Verlag, Berlin.