C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
(4) Blackman, A. G.; Tolman, W. B. Struct. Bonding (Berlin) 2000, 97, 179-
211.
(5) Karlin, K. D.; Zuberbu¨hler, A. D. In Bioinorganic Catalysis, 2nd ed.,
revised and expanded; Reedijk, J., Bouwman, E., Eds.; Marcel Dekker:
New York, 1999; pp 469-534.
(6) Solomon, E. I.; Sundaram, U. M.; Machonkin, T. E. Chem. ReV. 1996,
96, 2563-2605.
(7) Cole, A. P.; Root, D. E.; Mukherjee, P.; Solomon, E. I.; Stack, T. D. P.
Science 1996, 273, 1848-1850.
dynamic parameters derived from the reversible kinetics (overall
forward and back reactions) are ∆H° ) -28 ( 2 kJ/mol, ∆S° )
-61 ( 12 J mol-1 K-1 (K ) (7.6 ( 0.6) × 104 M-2, 183 K);
nearly all other Cu2O2 peroxo complexes measured exhibit con-
siderably more negative (favorable) ∆H° values.15,33 Compared to
[(MePY2)CuI]+ reaction with O2 (in acetone solvent, where the
adduct [((MePY2)Cu}2(O2)]2+ forms),17,31 the 1/O2 reaction is
slower and the peroxo product 3 is somewhat less stable. By
contrast, in the reaction of [CuI(AN)]+ (2) with O2, the bis-µ-oxo
product [{CuIII(AN)}2(O)2]2+ (4Oxo) forms much faster than does
3 (Figure 2), ∆Hq ) -9.9 ( 0.6 kJ/mol (again implicating a steady
state intermediate forms in a preequilibrium), ∆Sq ) -210 ( 3 J
mol-1 K-1, and kon ) (2.7 ( 0.1) × 104 M-2 s-1, 183 K. The
thermodynamic parameters obtained are distinctive; a relatiVely
unfavorable reaction enthalpy (as for formation of 3), ∆H° ) -24
( 1 kJ/mol, is accompanied by peculiarly favorable (compared to
all other systems)15,33 reaction entropy ∆S° ) -14 ( 6 J mol-1
K-1 (K ) (1.02 ( 0.07) × 106 M-2, 183 K). While 3 is quite stable
at reduced temperatures (i.e., hours, at 193 K), 4Oxo decomposes
relatively quickly (cf., Figure 2, right), ∆H° ) 35 ( 2 kJ/mol,
∆S° ) -95 ( 11 J mol-1 K-1 kdecomp ) (3.0 ( 0.2) × 10-1 s-1 at
223 K.
(8) Halfen, J. A.; Mahapatra, S.; Wilkinson, E. C.; Kaderli, S.; Young, V.
G., Jr.; Que, L., Jr.; Zuberbu¨hler, A. D.; Tolman, W. B. Science 1996,
271, 1397-1400.
(9) Holland, P. L.; Tolman, W. B. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1999, 190-192, 855-
869.
(10) Mahadevan, V.; Hou, Z.; Cole, A. P.; Root, D. E.; Lal, T. K.; Solomon,
E. I.; Stack, T. D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11996-11997.
(11) Mahadevan, V.; Henson, M. J.; Solomon, E. I.; Stack, T. D. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10249-10250.
(12) Cahoy, J.; Holland, P. L.; Tolman, W. B. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 2161-
2168.
(13) Henson, M. J.; Mukherjee, P.; Root, D. E.; Stack, T. D. P.; Solomon, E.
I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10332-10345.
(14) See Supporting Information for more details.
(15) Liang, H.-C.; Karlin, K. D.; Dyson, R.; Kaderli, S.; Jung, B.; Zuberbu¨hler,
A. D. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 5884-5894.
(16) Pidcock, E.; Obias, H. V.; Abe, M.; Liang, H.-C.; Karlin, K. D.; Solomon,
E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1299-1308.
(17) Obias, H. V.; Lin, Y.; Murthy, N. N.; Pidcock, E.; Solomon, E. I.; Ralle,
M.; Blackburn, N. J.; Neuhold, Y.-M.; Zuberbu¨hler, A. D.; Karlin, K. D.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12960-12961.
(18) Chelate ring size dramatically affects copper complex redox potentials
and corresponding CuI/O2 reactivity. See refs 2 and 19.
(19) Schatz, M.; Becker, M.; Thaler, F.; Hampel, F.; Schindler, S.; Jacobson,
R. R.; Tyekla´r, Z.; Murthy, N. N.; Ghosh, P.; Chen, Q.; Zubieta, J.; Karlin,
K. D. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 2312-2322.
(20) Liang, H.-C.; Kim, E.; Incarvito, C. D.; Rheingold, A. L.; Karlin, K. D.
Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41. ASAP on web March 21, 2002.
(21) Karlin, K. D.; Haka, M. S.; Cruse, R. W.; Meyer, G. J.; Farooq, A.;
Gultneh, Y.; Hayes, J. C.; Zubieta, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1196-
1207.
Other remarkable differences are in the solvent dependencies of
formation of O2-adducts of 1 and 2. The side-on peroxo [{CuII-
(MeAN)}2(O2)]2+ (3) is the predominant product of O2 reaction
with 1 in CH2Cl2, acetone, tetrahydrofuran (THF) and diethyl ether
solvents, based on UV-vis or resonance Raman data.34 [{CuIII-
(AN)}2(O)2]2+ (4Oxo) is formed exclusively from 2/O2 reaction in
CH2Cl2. However, both 4Oxo and a µ-η2:η2 (side-on)-peroxo
(22) Karlin, K. D.; Tyekla´r, Z.; Farooq, A.; Haka, M. S.; Ghosh, P.; Cruse, R.
W.; Gultneh, Y.; Hayes, J. C.; Toscano, P. J.; Zubieta, J. Inorg. Chem.
1992, 31, 1436-1451.
complex [{CuII(AN)}2(O2)]2+ (4Peroxo) form in acetone {νCu-Cu
)
271 cm-1; νCu-O ) 604 cm-1; ∆(18O) ) 26 cm-1} and THF {νCu-Cu
) 271 cm-1}, in a roughly 1:1 proportion (UV-vis criterion).14
Yet, in diethyl ether, 80-90% (UV-vis criterion) 4Peroxo forms.
Thus, the AN ligand can support either peroxo-Cu2(O2) or bis-µ-
oxo-Cu2(O)2 in a strongly solvent dependent manner. It is notable
that the bis-µ-oxo versus peroxo preference (THF vs CH2Cl2) for
the AN ligand complex is opposite to the results seen by the groups
of Tolman (with triaza macrocyclic ligands)12 and Stack (with
substituted ethylenediamine ligands).11 It is important to obtain a
further detailed understanding of the factors underlying copper(I)/
O2 chemistry leading to µ-η2:η2 (side-on)-peroxo- versus bis-µ-
oxo-dicopper(III) species, their relative energetics and their
possible differential reactivity toward substrate oxidation.11,13,35-40
Solvent medium effects (here and previously)11,12 may be due to
environmental (dielectric or solvation) influences or coordination
to copper.41 Sterically demanding ligands have been suggested to
favor side-on peroxo-dicopper(II) complex formation,9,11,12 but a
-CH3 versus -H substituent (in MeAN vs AN) is sufficient to
shift the course of reaction. H-bonding in complexes of AN could
also be important. Further studies are needed.
(23) Blackburn, N. J.; Karlin, K. D.; Cocannon, M.; Hayes, J. C.; Gultneh,
Y.; Zubieta, J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 939-940.
(24) Blackburn, N. J.; Strange, R. W.; Reedijk, J.; Volbeda, A.; Farooq, A.;
Karlin, K. D.; Zubieta, J. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 1349-1357.
(25) Sanyal, I.; Mahroof-Tahir, M.; Nasir, S.; Ghosh, P.; Cohen, B. I.; Gultneh,
Y.; Cruse, R.; Farooq, A.; Karlin, K. D.; Liu, S.; Zubieta, J. Inorg. Chem.
1992, 31, 4322-4332.
(26) Absorption spectra indicate predominant formation of one product, but
resonance Raman spectroscopy can detect minute (<5-10%) amounts
of the other isomer, if present in each case.
(27) Holland, P. L.; Cramer, C. J.; Wilkinson, E. C.; Mahapatra, S.; Rodgers,
K. R.; Itoh, S.; Taki, M.; Fukuzumi, S.; Que, L., Jr.; Tolman, W. B. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 792-802.
(28) Data obtained in tetrahydrofuran, as interference from a broad Raman
feature at ∼760 cm-1 precluded obtainng good νO-O data in CH2Cl2.
(29) Henson, M. J.; Mahadevan, V.; Stack, T. D. P.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg.
Chem. 2001, 40, 5068-5069.
(30) This band position is very high energy compared to values observed for
almost all bis-µ-oxo-dicopper(III) complexes. See refs 4 and 10.
(31) This adduct, as a solution (ref 17) or solid (ref 32), is a mixture of peroxo
(major form) and bis-µ-oxo (minor) species.
(32) Pidcock, E.; DeBeer, S.; Obias, H. V.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.;
Karlin, K. D.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1870-1878.
(33) Karlin, K. D.; Kaderli, S.; Zuberbu¨hler, A. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30,
139-147.
(34) CH2Cl2: 264 cm-1 Cu-Cu. Acetone: 721 cm-1 (∆(18O) ) 38 cm-1).
ν
-1
THF: 721 cm
(∆(18O) ) 38 cm-1). A small amount of bis-µ-oxo-
dicopper(III) species is also observed in this solvent, νCu-O, 586 cm-1
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to the National Institutes
of Health (K.D.K., GM28962; E.I.S., DK31450) and Swiss National
Science Foundation (A.D.Z.) for support of this research.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic details, kinetics
(UV-vis traces, Eyring and van’t Hoff plots), resonance Raman and
X-ray crystallographic data (PDF). This material is available free of
(∆(18O) ) 25 cm-1).
(35) Mahapatra, S.; Halfen, J. A.; Tolman, W. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 11575-11586.
(36) Holland, P. L.; Rodgers, K. R.; Tolman, W. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1999, 38, 1139-1142.
(37) Pidcock, E.; Obias, H. V.; Zhang, C. X.; Karlin, K. D.; Solomon, E. I. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7841-7847.
(38) Itoh, S.; Taki, M.; Nakao, H.; Holland, P. L.; Tolman, W. B.; Que, L.,
Jr.; Fukuzumi, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 398-400.
(39) Taki, M.; Itoh, S.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6203-
6204.
References
(40) (3) is relatively unreactive towards added substrates whereas 4Oxo (CH2Cl2
solvent) reacts rapidly with dihydroanthracene and benzyl alcohol.
(41) Results on a system where solvent coordination is clearly indicated will
be included in a manuscript currently under preparation.
(1) Zhang, C. X.; Liang, H.-C.; Humphreys, K. J.; Karlin, K. D. In Catalytic
ActiVation of Dioxygen by Metal Complexes; Simandi, L., Ed.; Kluwer:
Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002. In press.
(2) Schindler, S. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 2311-2326.
(3) Suzuki, M.; Furutachi, H.; Okawa, H. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2000, 200-
202, 105-129.
JA0125265
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 16, 2002 4171