3H, CH3), 1.38 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.05 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3, –SiMe3); δC
(50 MHz, CDCl ) 139.6 (Ar), 135.4 (CH᎐CH , CH), 128.8
We also thank Mrs S. S. Kulkarni for the GC-MS analysis.
MK thanks CSIR, New Delhi, for a Research Fellowship grant.
᎐
3
2
(Ar), 127.9 (Ar), 126.6 (Ar), 117.9 (CH᎐CH , CH ), 108.7 (C ,
᎐
2
2
2
–C–), 80.9 (C4, CH), 79.8 (C5, CH), 62.6 (N–CH2Ph, CH2), 58.1
(–CH2–N–, CH2), 46.9 (–N–CH2TMS), 27.0 (CH3), 26.7
(CH3), Ϫ1.35 (3 × CH3); GC/MS: m/z (%) 333 (Mϩ) (<1%),
260 (<1%), 206 (57), 134 (12), 91 (100), 73 (10).
References
1 (a) B. Ganem, Acc. Chem. Res., 1996, 29, 340; (b) A. de Raadt,
C. W. Ekhart, M. Ebner and A. E. Stütz, Top. Curr. Chem., 1997,
187, 157; (c) A. E. Stütz, Iminosugars as Glycosidase Inhibitors:
Nojirimycin and Beyond, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1999;
(d ) V. H. Lillelund, H. H. Jensen, X. Laing and M. Bols, Chem. Rev.,
2002, 102, 515 and references therein; (e) Y. Ichikawa, Y. Igarashi,
M. Ichikawa and Y. Suhara, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 3007.
2 N. Asano, R. J. Nash, R. J. Molyneux and G. W. J. Fleet,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2000, 11, 1645.
3 For some reviews on this topic see: (a) D. L. Zechel and S. G.
Withers, Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 11; (b) P. Sears and C.-H. Wong,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 2300; (c) T. D. Heightman and
A. T. Vasella, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 750.
4 (a) T. M. Jespersen, W. Dong, M. R. Sierks, T. Skrydstrup, I. Lundt
and M. Bols, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 1778;
(b) A. Hansen, T. M. Tagmose and M. Bols, Chem. Commun., 1996,
2649; (c) M. Bols, R. G. Hazell and Ib B. Thomsen, Chem. Eur. J.,
1997, 3, 940; (d ) H. Liu, X. Liang, H. H. Søhoel, A. Bülow and
M. Bols, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 5116; (e) H. Søhoel, X. Liang
and M. Bols, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2001, 1584.
5 See ref. 1(e) and (a) Y. Igarashi, M. Ichikawa and Y. Ichikawa,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1996, 6, 553; (b) Y. Ichikawa and
Y. Igarashi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 4585; (c) M. Ichikawa,
Y. Igarashi and Y. Ichikawa, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 1767;
(d ) Y. Igarashi, M. Ichikawa and Y. Ichikawa, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1996, 37, 2707.
6 (a) Y. Nishimura, T. Kudo, S. Kondo and T. Takeuchi, J. Antibiot.,
1994, 47, 101; (b) Y. Nishimura, Studies in Natural Products
Chemistry, ed. Atta-ur-Rahman, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995, vol 16,
p 75; (c) Y. Nishimura, T. Satoh, T. Kudo, S. Kondo and T. Takeuchi,
BioMed. Chem., 1996, 4, 91; (d ) Y. Nishimura, E. Shitara,
H. Adachi, M. Toyoshima, M. Nakajima, Y. Okami and T. Takeuchi,
J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 2; (e) E. Shitara, Y. Nishimura, F. Kojima
and T. Takeuchi, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2000, 8, 343.
7 R. C. Bernotas, G. Papandreou, J. Urbach and B. Ganem,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 31, 3393.
8 T. Sekioka, M. Shibano and G. Kusano, Nat. Med., 1995, 49,
332.
(3aR,7R,7aR)-5-Benzyl-2,2,7-trimethylhexahydro[1,3]-
dioxolo[4,5-c]pyridine (28). A solution containing 27 (0.200 g,
0.6 mmol) and 1,4-dicyanonaphthalene (DCN) (0.015 mg,
0.08 mmol) in 2-propanol (100 mL) was irradiated using a
450 W Hanovia medium pressure mercury vapor lamp as the
light source. After about 2 h, when most of the starting material
(>90%) had reacted, the irradiation was discontinued and the
solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude photo-
lysate was purified using column chromatography (silica, pet.
ether–acetone, 99 : 1) to afford 28 (0.086 g, 55%) as a colorless
oil. [α]2D5 Ϫ8.0 (c = 0.2, CHCl3); δH (500 MHz, CDCl3) 7.30 (m,
5H, Ar), 3.65 (m, 2H, N–CH2Ph), 3.59 (ddd, J 10.3, 8.7, 4.0 Hz,
1H, H3a), 3.24 (ddd, J 9.9, 4.0, 1.2 Hz, 1H, H7a), 2.97 (dd, J 10.6,
8.9 Hz, 1H, H4eq), 2.87 (dd, J 11.7, 3.8 Hz, 1H, H6eq), 2.18 (t,
J 9.9 Hz, 1H, H4ax), 2.0 (m, 1H, H7), 1.82 (t, J 11.1 Hz, 1H,
H6ax), 1.46 (s, 3H, gem CH3), 1.44 (s, 3H, gem CH3), 1.0 (d, J 6.8
Hz, 3H, CH3); δC (125 MHz, CDCl3) 137.8, 128.7, 128.0,
126.9 (Ar), 109.7 (C2, –C–), 85.3 (C3a, CH), 76.3 (C7a), 61.7
(N–CH2Ph, CH2), 58.8 (C4, CH2), 54.5 (C6, CH2), 33.7 (C7,
CH), 26.7 (gem CH3), 26.5 (gem CH3), 15.2 (CH3); GC/MS
m/z 261 (Mϩ), 246, 203, 134, 120, 91.
Preparation of 14ؒHCl from 28. To a solution of 28 (0.021 g,
0.077 mmol) in distilled MeOH (0.5 mL) was added conc. HCl
(2 drops) and the reaction mixture was hydrogenated for 7 h at
atmospheric pressure in the presence of Pd(OH)2 on charcoal
(20%) (0.001 g). The reaction mixture was passed through a
short pad of Celite and the solvent was removed under reduced
pressure to afford 14ؒHCl (0.013 g, ∼100%) as an amorphous
solid.
9 For 1-N-iminosugar syntheses see refs 4–6 and (a) G. Guanti and
R. Riva, Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 357; (b) J. Andersch and
M. Bols, Chem. Eur. J., 2001, 7, 2744; (c) G. Zhao, U. C. Deo
and B. Ganem, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 201; (d ) Y. J. Kim, M. Ichikawa
and Y. Ichikawa, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 2599; (e) G. Mehta and
N. Mohal, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 5747; ( f ) U. Kazmaier and
C. Schneider, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 817; (g) X. Liang,
A. Lohse and M. Bols, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 7432; (h) M. Bols,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 2097.
10 For 3,4,5-piperidine triol syntheses, see refs 5(a), 7 and (a) H. Han,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 1567; (b) N. T. Patil, S. John,
S. G. Sabharwal and D. D. Dhawale, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2002, 10,
2155; (c) M. Amat, N. Llor, M. Huguet, E. Molins, E. Espinosa
and J. Bosch, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 3257; (d ) K. C. Jang, I.-Y. Jeong,
M. S. Yang, S. U. Choi and K. H. Park, Heterocycles, 2000, 53,
887; (e) M. Godskesen, I. Lundt, R. Madsen and B. Winchester,
Bioorg. Med. Chem., 1996, 4, 1857; ( f ) G. Legler, A. E. Stütz and
H. Immich, Carbohydr. Res., 1995, 272, 17; (g) D. Sames and R. Polt,
Synlett, 1995, 552; (h) T. Tschamber, F. Backenstrass, M. Neuberger,
M. Zhender and J. Streith, Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 1135.
General procedure for enzyme inhibition assay. The inhibitory
potencies of the azasugars were determined spectrophoto-
metrically, by carrying out the inhibition assay of the glyco-
sidases in the presence of the azasugars utilizing the corre-
sponding p-nitrophenyl glycosides as the substrates.
In the case of β-glucosidase, each assay was performed in a
citrate buffer (100 mM, pH 6.0) with p-nitrophenyl β--gluco-
side as the substrate. Varying concentrations of the substrate
and the iminosugar were employed. The reaction was initiated
by the addition of 100 µL of appropriately diluted enzyme and
the reaction mixture, which had a final volume of 1 mL, was
incubated at 37 ЊC, for 10 min. Thereupon, it was quenched by
the addition of 2 mL of 1 M Na2CO3 solution and the optical
density of the resulting solution was read at 405 nm.
In the case of β-mannosidase, the assay was performed in an
acetate buffer (100 mM, pH 4.0). The reaction was carried out
at 25 ЊC for 20 min and then quenched by Na2CO3 solution. The
Ki values were determined from the Lineweaver–Burke double
reciprocal plots of 1/v vs. 1/[S]. Ki for competitive inhibition was
determined using the formula:10f Ki = [I]/{(Slope (I )/ Slope
(0))Ϫ1}.
11 (a) G. Pandey and M. Kapur, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 8821;
(b) G. Pandey and M. Kapur, Synthesis, 2001, 1263.
12 (a) G. Pandey, G. Kumaraswamy and U. T. Bhalerao, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1989, 30, 6059; (b) G. Pandey, G. D. Reddy and
G. Kumaraswamy, Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 8185.
13 G. Pandey and M. Kapur, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 3883.
14 (a) O. Mitsunobu and M. Yamada, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1967,
40, 2380; (b) O. Mitsunobu, Synthesis, 1981, 1; (c) D. L. Huges,
R. A. Reamer, J. J. Bergan and E. J. J. Grabowski, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1988, 110, 6487.
15 H. Iida, N. Yamazaki and C. Kibayashi, J. Org. Chem., 1987, 52,
3337.
Acknowledgements
We thank Ms Rupali Bhagwat, Dr P. R. Rajmohanan and Mrs
U. D. Phalgune for the special NMR experiments. We thank
Dr M. Vairamani, IICT, Hyderabad, for the HRMS analysis.
16 S. K. Kang and S. B. Lee, Chem. Commun., 1998, 761.
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 3 , 1, 3 3 2 1 – 3 3 2 6
3326