Scheme 1. 1-Deoxy-d-xylulose 1 and Putative Inhibitors 2
and 3 of Downstream Enzymes
Scheme 2. Diene Synthesis and Elaboration to Xylulose
Analoguesa
Bouvet and O’Hagan12 proposed 2 and 3 as potential
inhibitors of enzymes involved in the metabolism of 1-deoxy-
D-xylulose and the 5-phosphate 4. The compounds were
inactive; however, both exist almost exclusively in cyclic
forms 2a and 3a, preventing the key phosphorylation step.
Dihydroxylation of enone 5 was attempted during their
synthesis, but the diol product could not be isolated cleanly
from the reaction.
The same fluoroketone reactivity that prevents processing
of 2 and 3 creates potential handling difficulties, so we
planned a route in which the ketone is masked until a late
stage, and significantly, one in which phosphorylation of the
5-hydroxyl group is possible.
Stannane 6 was synthesized on a 0.5 mol scale according
to our published procedure13 and coupled with protected
iodoallylic alcohol 7 (synthesized from propiolic acid in four
steps; hydroiodination,14 esterification, selective reduction,15
and esterification) under modified Farina-Liebeskind condi-
tions16 with full conversion to afford the crude diene product
8 with a clean 19F NMR spectrum (Scheme 2).17 The diene
was freed from tin residues by KF treatment and could be
chromatographed on basic alumina, an essential precaution
considering the sensitivity of similar products18 to even
mildly acidic conditions. Overall, a moderate yield of diene
(which should be used soon after synthesis) was obtained.
Dihydroxylation occurred very slowly under standard condi-
tions; typical reactions required 1 week to reach 70-85%
conversion, and a significant fall in the pH of the medium
was observed over this period. However, when the pH was
maintained19 in the range 11.0-12.0, the reaction reached
a Reaction conditions: (i) Pd(OAc)2 (2.6 mol %), CuI (20.8 mol
%), Ph3P (10.4 mol %), DMF, 30-50 °C, 41%; (ii) K2OsO4‚2H2O
(2 mol %), (DHQD)2PHAL (4 mol %), K3Fe(CN)6 (3 equiv), K2CO3
(3 equiv), 1:1 t-BuOH/H2O, pH 11.0-12.0, rt, 54%; (iii) anhydrous
CuSO4 (2 equiv), PTSA (1 mol %), acetone, rt, 68%; (iv) 30%
H2O2 (4.2 equiv), LiOH‚H2O (2.2 equiv), 3:1 THF/H2O, 0 °C, 61%;
(v) Me3SiCl (1.2 equiv), MeOH, rt, 88%; (vi) HCl (12 M), THF,
rt.
completion in only 1 h and we were able to isolate diol 9 in
55% yield. The effect of pH maintenance is spectacular and
demonstrates the critical importance of rapid osmate ester
turnover for efficient catalysis. The use of the PMBz
protecting group is also relatively unusual;20 ester hydrolysis
probably prevents recovery of the diol in higher yield, and
it is possible that a PMB ether7b or PMP ether7a would offer
similar reactivity and greater stability under the reaction
conditions. However, we wished to be able to cleave the
primary hydroxyl group under mild nucleophilic conditions,
so these possibilities were not investigated. The dihydroxy-
lation failed completely when THP-protected dienol was
exposed to the AD conditions, demonstrating clearly that the
electronic complementarity between protecting group and
catalyst is a requirement for this reaction to proceed
efficiently.
The diol was protected in acetonide 10, and then the
synthesis was completed by hydrolysis of the ester (present-
ing an opportunity for phosphorylation of alcohol 11)
followed by removal of both acetals, to afford deoxy
difluorosugar 3a as a 1:3 mixture of R- and â-anomers.
Resonances in the 1H NMR were assigned fully (by gradient
COSY/HSQC/HMBC experiments), allowing the unambigu-
ous identification of the H-3 methine proton. The configu-
ration of the major anomer (3aâ) was assigned by a NOE
experiment that showed a strong transfer of magnetization
from the H-3 methine to the CF2H proton in the major
anomer. Both anomers converged on 12 when the mixture
was treated with acetone and an acid catalyst.
(11) (a) Gupta, R. N.; Hemscheidt, T.; Sayer, B. G.; Spenser, I. D. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11353. (b) Zhao, S.; Petrus, L.; Serianni, A. S.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3819. (c) Reuter, K.; Sanderbrand, S.; Jomaa, H.;
Wiesner, J.; Steinbrecher, I.; Beck, E.; Hintz, M.; Klebe, G.; Stubbs, M. T.
J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 5378.
(12) Bouvet, D.; O’Hagan, D. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 10481.
(13) Patel, S. T.; Percy, J. M.; Wilkes, R. D. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 9201.
(14) (a) Abarbri, M.; Parrain, J. L.; Cintrat, J. C.; Ducheˆne, A. Synthesis
1996, 82. (b) Takeuchi, R.; Tanabe, K.; Tanaka, S. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 1558.
(15) Marek, I.; Meyer, C.; Normant, J.-F. Org. Synth. 1996, 74, 194.
(16) Farina, V.; Kapadia, S.; Krishnan, B.; Wang, C.; Liebeskind, L. S.
J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5905.
(17) For related couplings, see: (a) DeBoos, G. A.; Fullbrook, J. J.;
Owton, W. M.; Percy, J. M.; Thomas, A. C. Synlett 2000, 963. (b) DeBoos,
G. A.; Fullbrook, J. J.; Percy, J. M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2859.
(18) Broadhurst, M. J.; Brown, S. J.; Percy, J. M.; Prime, M. E. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 3217.
(19) Mehltretter, G. M.; Dobler, C.; Sundermeier, U.; Beller, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8083.
The material exhibited the same magnitude and sign of
rotation as that reported by Bouvet and O’Hagan, confirming
(20) (a) Ref 7. (b) Report on slow AD reactions of a related alkenyl
substrate: Yokomatsu, T.; Yamagishi, T.; Suemune, K.; Yoshida, Y.;
Shibuya, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 767.
338
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 3, 2003