Extensive studies have been done to achieve clean,
selective, and atom-economic coupling reactions of CO2 with
epoxides to give cyclic carbonates, which are useful as
synthetic intermediates, aprotic polar solvents, and feedstocks
for engineering plastics.4-9 To test our strategy for the direct
activation of CO2 (Scheme 1), we decided to employ this
coupling reaction. When we initiated this study, no betaines
had been reported as catalysts for this reaction. Although
betaine-acid salts have been reported to act as catalysts,8
ammonium halides bearing the carboxyl group are generated
in situ, and the proposed mechanism is different from our
strategy outlined in Scheme 1. During this study, Ooi and
co-workers have revealed the great potential of betaines as
catalysts for asymmetric Mannich-type reactions.10 Here we
report bifunctional organocatalysts functioning as metal-free,
halogen-free, and solvent-free catalysts for the coupling
reactions of CO2 with epoxides.
Figure 1. Bifunctional organocatalysts bearing an ammonium
betaine framework.
Betaines 1-8 (Figure 1) were synthesized as described in
the Supporting Information, and they were screened for
catalytic activity toward the conversion of 1,2-epoxyhexane
(9a) into 10a. A stainless autoclave was charged with epoxide
9a, catalyst, and then CO2 (initial pressure 1 MPa), and the
mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 24 h. The results are
summarized in Table 1. Among ortho-substituted betaines
1-3, 3 with the trimethylammonium group gave the best
result (entries 1-3). The bulky substituent, such as the allyl
and benzyl groups, is likely to hinder the access of CO2/
epoxide to the phenolate anion. Next, we tried to tune the
Table 1. Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonate 10a from CO2 and
1,2-Epoxyhexane (9a) with Organocatalystsa
entry
catalyst
loading (mol %) yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
7
8
3
3
3
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
61
60
76
>99
>99
88
>99
>99
88
84
93
99
77
(4) (a) Kruper, W. J.; Dellar, D. V. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 725–727.
(b) Kim, H. S.; Kim, J. J.; Lee, S. D.; Lah, M. S.; Moon, D.; Jan, H. G.
Chem.sEur. J. 2003, 9, 678–686. (c) Paddock, R. L.; Nguyen, S. T. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 1622–1623. (d) Jiang, J.-L.; Gao, F.; Hua, R.; Qiu, X. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 40, 381–383. (e) Mele´ndez, J.; North, M.; Pasquale, R.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 3323–3326. (f) Zhang, X.; Jia, Y.-B.; Lu, X.-
B.; Li, B.; Wang, H.; Sun, L.-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6589–6592.
(g) Yin, S.-F.; Shimada, S. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1136–1138. (h) Mele´ndez,
J.; North, M.; Villuendas, P. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2577–2579
.
(5) (a) Kihara, N.; Hara, N.; Endo, T. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6198–
6202. (b) Yano, T.; Matsui, H.; Koike, T.; Ishiguro, H.; Fujihara, H.;
Yoshihara, M.; Maeshima, T. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1129–1130. (c)
Yamaguchi, K.; Ebitani, K.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, H.; Kaneda, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4526–4527. (d) Song, J.; Zhang, Z.; Han, B.; Hu,
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
S.; Li, W.; Xie, Y. Green Chem. 2008, 10, 1337–1341
.
8
(6) (a) Calo´, V.; Nacci, A.; Monopoli, A.; Fanizzi, A. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 2561–2563. (b) Kawanami, H.; Sasaki, A.; Matsui, K.; Ikushima, Y.
Chem. Commun. 2003, 896–897. (c) Takahashi, T.; Watahiki, T.; Kitazume,
S.; Yasuda, H.; Sakakura, T. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1664–1666. (d) Tian,
J.-S.; Miao, C.-X.; Wang, J.-Q.; Cai, F.; Du, Y.; Zhao, Y.; He, L.-N. Green
Chem. 2007, 9, 566–571. (e) Sakai, T.; Tsutsumi, Y.; Ema, T. Green Chem.
2008, 10, 337–341. (f) Sun, J.; Zhang, S.; Cheng, W.; Ren, J. Tetrahedron
L-Phe
11
4
61
15
o-dimethylaminophenol
p-MeOC6H4OH/DMAP7a,c
PhN+Me3·PhO-
a Conditions: 9a (1.2 mL, 10 mmol), catalyst (quantity indicated above),
1 MPa CO2, 120 °C, 24 h, in a 50-mL autoclave. b Determined by 1H NMR,
using 2-methoxynaphthalene as an internal standard.
Lett. 2008, 49, 3588–3591
.
(7) (a) Shen, Y.-M.; Duan, W.-L.; Shi, M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345,
337–340. (b) Barbarini, A.; Maggi, R.; Mazzaacani, A.; Mori, G.; Sartori,
G.; Sartorio, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2931–2934. (c) Shen, Y.-M.;
Duan, W.-L.; Shi, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 3080–3089. (d) Qi, C.;
Jiang, H.; Wang, Z.; Zou, B.; Yang, S. Synlett 2007, 255–258. (e) Zhou,
H.; Zhang, W.-Z.; Liu, C.-H.; Qu, J.-P.; Lu, X.-B. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73,
8039–8044. (f) Kayaki, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Ikariya, T. Angew. Chem., Int.
distance between the two functional groups in the catalyst
in two ways: one is to employ meta- and para-isomers 4
and 5, and the other is to examine biaryl systems 6-8. To
our delight, biphenyl compound 6 gave a higher yield than
3 (entries 3 and 10). To suppress the rotational flexibility
determining the distance between the two functional groups,
we replaced the phenyl group by the naphthyl group. As
expected, catalytic activity increased in the following order:
6 < 7 < 8 (entries 10-12). In the case of 8, the catalyst
loading could be reduced to 1 mol % although the yield
decreased a little (entry 13). We anticipated that because of
Ed. 2009, 48, 4194–4197
(8) Zhou, Y.; Hu, S.; Ma, X.; Liang, S.; Jiang, T.; Han, B. J. Mol. Catal.
A: Chem. 2008, 284, 52–57
.
.
(9) (a) Du, Y.; Cai, F.; Kong, D.-L.; He, L.-N. Green Chem. 2005, 7,
518–523. (b) Xie, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, T.; He, J.; Han, B.; Wu, T.; Ding,
K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7255–7258. (c) He, J.; Wu, T.; Zhang,
Z.; Ding, K.; Han, B.; Xie, Y.; Jiang, T.; Liu, Z. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13,
6992–6997
.
(10) (a) Uraguchi, D.; Koshimoto, K.; Ooi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 10878–10879. (b) Uraguchi, D.; Koshimoto, K.; Ooi, T. Chem.
Commun. 2010, 46, 300–302. (c) Uraguchi, D.; Koshimoto, K.; Miyake,
S.; Ooi, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5567–5569.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 24, 2010
5729