9142 J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 53, No. 23, 2005
Rung and Schwack
After 15 min 200 mL of water was added and the product extracted
twice with 50 mL of diethyl ether. The organic layer was washed with
300 mL of sodium carbonate solution (0.1 mol/L) and 300 mL of brine.
Purification performed by column chromatography on silica gel (25 g)
with petroleum ether/diethyl ether (1:1 v/v) as eluent yielded 637 mg
(24.0%) of 2 as a clear green oil: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ
(ppm) 8.03 (m; 2 H), 7.51 (m; 2 H), 4.25 (dq; 4 H; J ) 7.1/10.3 Hz),
1.31 (t; 6 H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ (ppm) 163.94 (s),
156.01 (d; J ) 7.2 Hz), 121.90 (d; J ) 5.1 Hz), 123.32 (s), 65.58 (d;
J ) 6.0 Hz), 15.72 (d; J ) 7.2 Hz).
Synthesis of O,O-Diethyl O-(4-Hydroxyaminophenyl) Thiophos-
phate. (Hydroxylaminoparathion, 3). To a solution of 2 (0.07 mmol,
19.3 mg) in 3 mL of methanol was added a solution of ascorbic acid
in water (15.4 mg/mL), and the mixture was shaken for 5 min.
Purification performed by preparative HPLC yielded 6.0 mg (30.9%)
of 3 as a clear green oil: UV/vis (methanol) λmax (nm) (log ꢀ) 238
(3.96), 285 (3.08); IR (ATR) ν (cm-1) 3279 (w), 2982 (w), 2929 (w),
2907 (w), 1739 (w), 1597 (w), 1501 (m), 1442 (w), 1390 (w), 1291
(w), 1220 (w), 1200 (m), 1160 (m), 1099 (w), 1013 (s), 918 (s), 816
(s), 781 (s), 721 (w), 689 (w); accurate mass (mean of 8 measurements
( standard deviation) m/z ) 278.0625 ( 0.0007 [M + H]+ (calcd m/z
278.0616 for C10H17NO4PS); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ (ppm)
6.96 (m; 2 H), 6.80 (m; 2 H), 4.14 (dq; 4 H; J ) 7.1/10.0 Hz), 1.26 (t;
6 H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ (ppm) 149.54 (s), 143.07 (d;
J ) 7.8 Hz), 120.86 (d; J ) 4.2 Hz), 113.75 (s), 64.76 (d; J ) 5.7 Hz),
15.75 (d; J ) 7.2 Hz).
Synthesis of O,O,O-Triethyl Thiophosphate (TETP). According
to the method described by Wettach et al. (7), the preparation of TETP
was performed from sodium ethoxide (11 mmol: 0.26 g of Na in 6
mL of ethanol) and O,O-diethyl chlorothiophosphate (8 mmol, 1.50
g). However, instead of heating the mixture was stirred at ambient
temperature for 14 h. Then the reaction mixture was poured into water
(50 mL) and extracted three times with 20 mL of diethyl ether. After
being dried over sodium sulfate and evaporation, without further
purification, 1.24 g (78.2%) of pure TETP was obtained as colorless
clear liquid: GLC/MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z ) 198 (76%), 170 (9%) [M -
C2H4]+, 153 (8%), 143 (19%), 142 (17%) [M - C2H4 - C2H4]+, 126
(26%), 121 (80%), 115 (50%), 114 (52%), 109 (33%), 97 (61%), 93
(72%), 81 (28%), 65 (100%).
Synthesis of O-(4-{[6-({4-[(Diethoxyphosphorothioyl)oxy]phenyl}-
amino)-3,4-dioxo-1,5-cyclohexadien-1-yl]amino}phenyl) O,O-Diethyl
Thiophosphate (7). Aminoparathion (4) (0.54 mmol, 140 mg) and
pyrocatechol (0.54 mmol, 59 mg) were dissolved in dried diethyl ether
(6 mL), and silver oxide (1.07 mmol, 248.6 mg) was added. After the
mixture was stirred for 30 min at ambient temperature, the solids were
filtered off and the solvent was evaporated. The crude residue was
purified by preparative HPLC and yielded 9.3 mg (5.5%) of 7 as a
dark red, strongly viscous liquid: UV/vis (methanol) λmax (nm) (log ꢀ)
224 (4.24), 262 (4.13), 303 (4.14), 433 (3.62); IR (ATR) ν (cm-1) 3277
(w), 2981 (w), 2916 (w), 2870 (w), 1741 (w), 1608 (m), 1585 (m),
1557 (m), 1504 (s), 1491 (s), 1407 (m), 1391 (m), 1336 (w), 1291 (w),
1197 (s), 1161 (s), 1097 (m), 1012 (s), 919 (s), 818 (s), 791 (s), 756
(m), 742 (m), 708 (m); LC/MS (ESI+) m/z (relative intensity) ) 627.07
(100%), 628.13 (29.2%), 629.12 (15.2%), 630.11 (3.8%), 631.10
(1.0%); accurate mass (mean of 6 measurements ( standard deviation)
m/z ) 627.1146 ( 0.0006 [M + H]+ (calcd m/z 627.1154 for
C26H33N2O8P2S2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ (ppm) 7.22 (m; 8
H), 5.75 (s; 2 H), 4.21 (dq; 8 H; J ) 7.0/10.2 Hz), 1.30 (dt; 12 H; J )
0.6 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ (ppm) 147.25 (d; J ) 7.8
Hz), 121.56 (d; J ) 4.8 Hz), 97.24 (s), 65.04 (d; J ) 5.7 Hz), 15.73
(d; J ) 6.9 Hz). Note that some carbon signals are not detectable due
to rapid keto-enol tautomerisms of the ortho-quinoid ring system.
Synthesis of O-[4-({6-[(Diethoxyphosphorothioyl)oxy]-3-imino-
4-oxo-1,5-cyclohexadien-1-yl}amino)phenyl] O,O-Diethyl Thiophos-
phate (8), O-(2-Amino-3-oxo-3H-phenoxazin-7-yl) O,O-Diethyl Thio-
phosphate (9), and O-(4-{[3-Amino-4-({4-[(diethoxyphosphorothioyl)-
oxy]phenyl}amino)-6-oxo-2,4 -cyclohexadien-1-ylidene]amino}phenyl)
O,O-Diethyl Thiophosphate (10). To a solution of polyphenol oxidase
(PPO) in phosphate buffer pH 6.5 (25.5 mg/500 mL ) 74460 U/L;
PPO activity, 1460 U/mg of dry weight) a methanolic solution of 4
(93.3 mg/5 mL, 0.36 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred
vigorously for 70 h and extracted with diethyl ether (200 mL, four
times). After drying over sodium sulfate and solvent evaporation, 8-10
were isolated by preparative HPLC. Whereas 8 was only stable in
solution and completely decomposed during isolation, 9 and 10 were
individually obtained in yields of 8.1 mg (11.9%) and 4.6 mg (6.2%),
respectively.
Compound 8: UV/vis (methanol) λmax (nm) 233, 300, 486; LC/MS
(ESI+) m/z (relative intensity) ) 535.14 (100%), 536.10 (25.2%),
537.06 (13.3%), 538.06 (2.8%), 539.06 (0.7%); accurate mass (mean
of 5 measurements ( standard deviation) m/z ) 535.0902 ( 0.0016
[M + H]+ (calcd 535.0891 for C20H29N2O7P2S2).
Compound 9: red crystals, UV/vis (methanol) λmax (nm) (log ꢀ) 237
(4.06), 437 (3.99); IR (ATR) ν (cm-1) 3445 (m), 3336 (m), 2980 (w),
2931 (w), 1712 (w), 1650 (w), 1584 (s), 1568 (s), 1504 (m), 1466 (s),
1449 (s), 1415 (s), 1400 (m), 1367 (m), 1312 (w), 1287 (m), 1245 (s),
1181 (s), 1163 (s), 1139 (m), 1118 (s), 1040 (m), 1012 (s), 959 (s),
897 (s), 868 (s), 852 (s), 843 (s), 812 (s), 793 (s), 765 (s), 741 (s), 696
(s), 659 (s); LC/MS (ESI+) m/z (relative intensity) ) 381.07 (100%),
382.11 (19.1%), 383.08 (7.3%), 384.09 (1.2%); accurate mass (mean
of 5 measurements ( standard deviation) m/z ) 381.0667 ( 0.0007
1
[M + H]+ (calcd 381.0674 for C16H18N2O5PS); H NMR (DMSO-d6,
500 MHz) δ (ppm) 7.73 (d; 1 H; J ) 8.8 Hz), 7.32 (dd; 1 H; J )
2.5/1.7 Hz), 7.21 (ddd; 1 H; J ) 1.5 Hz), 6.79 (NH2; s; 2 H), 6.37 (s;
1 H), 6.35 (s; 1 H), 4.24 (dq; 4 H; J ) 7.1/10.3 Hz), 1.31 (dt; 6 H; J
) 0.7 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ (ppm) 180.45 (s), 149.61
(d; J ) 7.5 Hz), 148.77/148.07/147.49 (s), 142.36 (d; J ) 1.0 Hz),
131.57 (d; J ) 1.8 Hz), 129.08 (d; J ) 1.0 Hz), 118.53 (d; J ) 5.1
Hz), 108.56 (d; J ) 5.4 Hz), 103.99 (s), 98.69 (s), 65.56 (d; J ) 6.0
Hz), 15.88 (d; J ) 7.2 Hz).
Compound 10: dark red, very viscous liquid, UV/vis (methanol)
λmax (nm) (log ꢀ) 233 (4.81), 268 (4.68), 350 (4.73), 532 (3.96); IR
(ATR) ν (cm-1) 2978 (w), 2929 (w), 2782 (w), 2701 (w), 1711 (m),
1574 (s), 1505 (s), 1374 (s), 1344 (s), 1257 (m), 1201 (s), 1159 (m),
1098 (w), 1020 (s), 924 (s), 820 (m), 791 (m), 760 (m) 694 (m); LC/
MS (ESI+) m/z (relative intensity) ) 626.14 (100%), 627.16 (30.6%),
628.10 (14.1%), 629.15 (3.6%), 630.12 (0.8%); accurate mass (mean
of 6 measurements ( standard deviation) m/z ) 626.1311 ( 0.0010
1
[M + H]+ (calcd 626.1313 for C26H34N3O7P2S2); H NMR (DMSO-
d6, 500 MHz) δ (ppm) 9.14 (NH; s; 1 H), 7.40/6.94 (m, m; 2 H, 2 H),
7.25/7.23 (m, m; 2 H, 2 H), 6.53 (NH2; s; 2 H), 5.67 (s; 1 H), 5.49 (s;
1 H), 4.21 (dq; 8 H; J ) 7.0/10.2 Hz), 1.31/1.30 (t; 12 H); 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ (ppm) 180.65 (s), 154.34/150.20/146.80 (s),
147.45, 135.66 (d; J ) 1.8 Hz), 147.11/146.48 (d, d; J ) 7.8 Hz),
125.26/121.79 (s, s), 121.60/121.31 (d, d; J ) 4.8 Hz), 96.46/89.03
(s), 65.06/64.98 (d, d; J ) 6.0 Hz), 15.77/15.74 (d, d; J ) 7.2 Hz).
Incubation of Aminoparathion with Polyphenols and PPO. To a
solution of 10-40 µmol of caffeic acid, catechol, pyrocatechol,
quercetin, or naringenin, respectively, in 0.25 mL of acetone were added
50 µL of a methanolic solution of aminoparathion (45.3 g/L), 3.75 mL
of water, and 1 mL of an aqueous PPO solution (1 g/L, 1460 U/mL).
Under occasional shaking the mixture was incubated at 25 °C for 24
h. After addition of 1 mL of methanol the mixture was centrifuged
(3000 min-1), the supernatant analyzed for aminoparathion by HPLC,
and the precipitate washed four times with about 1 mL of water and
lyophilized.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Photoreduction of parathion 1 was postulated as stepwise
reduction of the nitro group (Figure 1) (1-3). Although 3 and
4 have not been found individually, their evidental formation
was proven by the condensation products 5 and 6, respectively.
During irradation of 1 in the presence of 2-propanol (1 g/L) as
model for hydroxylated cutin acids, now 3 and 4 could be
identified by means of HPLC, LC/MS, and comparison with
synthesized standards. After 6 h of irradiation, 3 increased to 4
mol % of the initial parathion, while 4 reached 0.25 mol %
only. Contrarily, after irradiation of 1 in cyclohexene (1 g/L)
as model for olefinic cuticle constitutents, only 5 and 6 could
be determined (data not shown).