5684
J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5684-5686
Su bstitu tion of â-Ha lostyr en es by MeS-
cal answer to the mechanistic question. Since both
concerted routes involve cleavage of the C-halogen bond
in the rate-determining step, the study of the “element
effect”7 i.e., the relative reactivity of a vinyl bromide vs
the corresponding vinyl chloride, could detect a C-halo-
gen rate-determining bond cleavage. Both the stereo-
chemical and the element effect criteria are necessary for
distinguishing a concerted from a stepwise vinylic sub-
stitution via addition-elimination.
We therefore decided to further investigate the mech-
anism of the reaction since a concerted in-plane bimo-
lecular vinylic substitution6 may be observed in an
inactivated system, and â-halostyrenes should indeed be
relatively inactivated in comparison with YCHdCHHal
(Hal ) Cl, Br) where Y is a good electron-withdrawing
group such as CN, CO2R′. Moreover, substitution of
â-halostyrenes by lithium dimethylcuprate gave both
retained products and a considerable element effect: kBr/
kCl of ca. 102 whereas â-fluorostyrene was unreactive.8
We applied several mechanistic criteria, i.e., the kBr/kCl
element effect, the cis/trans relative ratio, the stereo-
chemistry, the effect of a p-MeO substituent, and the
effect of a radical scavenger on the reaction rate of
â-bromostyrenes with the MeS- ion.
Xin Chen and Zvi Rappoport*
Department of Organic Chemistry, The Hebrew University,
J erusalem 91904, Israel
Received March 3, 1998
In 1983 Tiecco and co-workers reported vinylic substi-
tution of relatively inactive vinyl halides.1 E-â-bromosty-
rene (E-Br ) reacted rapidly with MeS- or i-PrS- in
HMPA at room temperature to give g95% of the substi-
tution product E-SR with g98% retained configuration.
The Z isomer, Z-Br , gave g95% of the >95% retained
substitution product Z-SR (eq 1). In DMSO or DMF high
yields but lower stereospecificities were observed, i.e., 9:1
and 2:8 E-SR:Z-SR (R ) Me) ratios, starting from E-Br
and Z-Br , respectively. In EtOH Z-Br reacted much
slower and E-Br did not react at all. Based on the
retention stereochemistry, an addition-elimination vi-
nylic substitution route,2 without further mechanistic
details, was suggested.1
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
E- and Z-â-bromostyrenes were prepared according to
Cristol9a and Grovenstein9b and a 1:1 E-Cl:Z-Cl mixture
was prepared from trans-cinnamic acid.10 The reactions
1
were followed directly in an NMR tube. The H NMR
spectra of reactants and products are given in Table 1.
Ster eoch em istr y of th e Su bstitu tion . We con-
firmed the previous observations that the reaction is fast
and gives retained products.1 The direct observation of
the reaction mixture enabled us to determine both
features at reaction times earlier than previously re-
ported. The reaction of a solution of 0.2 M of the Z-Br
with 0.22 M of NaSMe in DMSO-d6 at 295 K showed that
<8% of Z-Br remained after e3 min reaction time, and
that the rest was converted to the retained substitution
product, Z-SMe. No E-SMe was detected. After 8 min
no Z-Br was detected and after 13 min the inverted
product, E-SMe was formed in <0.16%. Hence, the
reaction is faster and more stereoselective than reported
by Tiecco.1
Reaction of 0.2 M of each of a 95:5 E-Br :Z-Br mixture
and MeSNa in DMSO-d6 at 295 K was somewhat slower.
A 40% amount of the vinyl bromide was converted to the
pure E-thioether E-SMe in 3 min. After standing
overnight, no E-Br remained, and the products were
95.8: 4.2 E-SMe:Z-SMe. Hence, the reaction is highly
stereoselective, and the overall substitution is stereospe-
cific.
This finding is of interest for two reasons. First,
â-bromostyrene should be relatively inactivated to nu-
cleophilic vinylic substitution, judging by the pKa of
toluene (41.2)3 which should serve as a rough measure
for the dispersal of the negative charge formed in the
transition state or the intermediate formed in the sub-
stitution. Hence, other mechanistic routes such as
elimination-addition via phenylacetylene,4,5 and an SRN
V
route,5 which are known for this system may be opera-
tive. Second, there is a recent interest in the operation
of a single step nucleophilic vinylic substitution,6 and the
main experimental evidence for it comes from inversion
during the substitution. However, whereas inversion is
the predicted outcome of an in-plane concerted substitu-
tion, a concerted substitution with retention by a per-
pendicular attack on the π* orbital is also a possibility.
Hence, stereochemistry alone does not give an unequivo-
(1) Tiecco, M.; Testaferri, L.; Tingoli, M.; Chianelli, D.; Montanucci,
M. J . Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4795.
(2) Rappoport, Z. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1969, 7, 1. Acc. Chem. Res.
1981, 14, 7, and references therein.
We conducted analogous reactions of the Z- and E-â-
chlorostyrenes with a 1:1.9 Z-Cl:E -Cl mixture. The
(3) Lowry, T. H.; Richardson, K. S. Mechanism and Theory in
Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Harper and Row: New York, 1987; p 294.
(4) Rappoport, Z. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1985, 104, 309.
(5) Galli, C.; Gentili, P.; Rappoport, Z. J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 6786.
(6) (a) Ochiai, M.; Oshima, K.; Masaki, Y. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 7059. (b) Shainyan, B. A.; Rappoport, Z. J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
3421. (c) Glukhovtsev, M. N.; Pross, A.; Radom, L. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 5961. (d) Lucchini, V.; Modena, G.; Pasquato, L. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4527; 1995, 117, 2297. (e) Okuyama, T.; Ochiai,
M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4785. (f) Beit-Yannai, M.; Rappoport,
Z.; Shainyan, B. A.; Danilevich, Y. S. J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8049.
(7) Bunnett, J . F.; Garbisch, E. W., J r.; Pruitt, K. M. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1957, 79, 385.
(8) Maffeo, C. V.; Marchese, G.; Naso, F.; Ronzini, L. J . Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans 1 1979, 92.
(9) (a) Cristol, S. J .; Norris, W. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 2645.
(b) Grovenstein, E., J r.; Lee, D. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 2639.
(10) Blitz, H. J ustus Liebig’s Ann. Chem. 1897, 296, 263.
S0022-3263(98)00408-3 CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 07/09/1998