Modulation of Lanthanide Complex Luminescence Intensity
A R T I C L E S
Figure 1. Schematic representations of our strategy to control the luminescence of lanthanide complexes. (a) Energy scheme for the luminescence process
in a typical Ln3+ complex. (b) Schematic representation of the relationship between the HOMO energy level and photoinduced electron transfer. (c and d)
Ln3+ complexes with a luminescence off/on switch. (c) Switch “off” model where PeT occurs, resulting in no Ln3+ luminescence. (d) Switch “on” model
where PeT does not occur, resulting in strong Ln3+ luminescence.
fluorescence lifetime in the nanosecond region. Taking advan-
tage of this feature, the influence of short-lived background
fluorescence and scattered light can be reduced to a negligible
level by the method termed time-resolved fluorescence (TRF)
measurement.6 In TRF measurement, the fluorescence signal is
collected for a certain gate time after an appropriate delay time,
following a pulsed excitation. By employing this method, it is
readily possible to distinguish long-lived lanthanide lumines-
cence from other contaminating signals. Furthermore, lanthanide
complexes have large Stokes shifts (>200 nm), which also helps
to reduce the background. Luminescent lanthanide complexes
have been exploited as luminescent tags for TRF measurements
in various fields,7 especially immunoassays8 and high throughput
screenings,9 where both high sensitivity and small assay scale
are essential.
Since the lanthanide f-f transitions have a low absorption
coefficient because of the Laporte selection rule, sensitized
emission is often used to achieve high luminescence.5 Here, a
chromophore incorporated in the ligand (called a sensitizer or
an antenna) absorbs excitation light with a large absorption
coefficient and transfers its energy to the metal by intersystem
crossing, whereby the metal enters the emission state (Figure
1a).10 By choosing an appropriate antenna, it is possible to
obtain a highly emissive lanthanide complex.10a,11
organic fluorophores, however, only a limited number of these
probes have so far been reported, though their targets include
pH,12 cations,13 anions,14 and others.15 The lack of a coherent
strategy for the design of luminescent sensors slows the
development of highly sensitive probes suitable for practical
use.
Photoinduced electron transfer (PeT) is a comprehensively
reported mechanism for excited-state quenching, in which an
electron is transferred from an electron donor moiety to an
(11) (a) Alpha, B.; Lehn, J.-M.; Mathis, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987,
26, 266-267. (b) Beeby, A.; Faulkner, S.; Parker, D.; Williams, J. A. G.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 1268-1273. (11) (a) Li, M.; Selvin,
P. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8132-8138. (b) Chen, J.; Selvin, P. R.
J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2000, 135, 27-32. (c) Steemers, F. J.;
Verboom, W.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; van der Tol, E. B.; Verhoeven, J. W. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9408-9414. (d) Fu, L.-M.; Wen, X.-F.; Ai,
X.-C.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Y.-S.; Zhang, J.-P.; Wang, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 747-750. (e) Dadabhoy, A.; Faulkner, S.; Sammes, P. G. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2002, 348-357. (f) Petoud, S.; Cohen, S. M.; Bu¨nzli,
J.-C. G.; Raymond, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13324-13325.
(g) Faulkner, S.; Pope, S. J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10526-
10527. (h) Mu¨rner, H.-R.; Chasssat, E.; Thummel, R. P.; Bu¨nzli, J.-C. G.
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000, 2809-2816. (i) Coppo, P.; Duati, M.;
Kozhevnikov, V. N.; Hofstraat, J. W.; De Cola, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 1806-1810. (j) Galaup, C.; Carrie´, M.-C.; Tisne`s, P.; Picard, C.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 2165-2175. (k) Elbanowski, S. L.; Ma¸kowska,
B.; Hnatejko, Z. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2002, 150, 233-247.
(12) (a) de Silva, A. P.; Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; Rice, T. E. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2116-2118. (b) Parker, D.; Senanayake, P. K.;
Williams, J. A. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1998, 2129-2139. (c)
Gunnlaugsson, T.; MacDo´naill, D. A.; Parker, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 12866-12876. (d) Lowe, M. P.; Parker, D.; Reany, O.; Aime, S.;
Botta, M.; Castellano, G.; Gianolio, E.; Pagliarin, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 7601-7609. (e) Gunnlaugsson, T.; Leonard, J. P.; Se´ne´chal,
K.; Harte, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12062-12063.
Currently, there is growing interest in lanthanide-based
luminescence probes for biological applications. Compared with
(6) (a) Parker, D.; Dickins, R. S.; Puschmann, H.; Crossland, C.; Howard, J.
A. K. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 1977-2010. (b) Døssing, A. Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem. 2005, 1425-1434.
(13) (a) de Silva, A. P.; Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; Rice, T. E.; Stewart, S. Chem.
Commun. 1997, 1891-1892. (b) Reany, O.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Parker, D.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2000, 1819-1831. (c) Hanaoka, K.; Kikuchi,
K.; Kojima, H.; Urano, Y.; Nagano, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
12470-12476.
(14) (a) Dickins, R. S.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Parker, D.; Peacock, R. D. Chem.
Commun. 1998, 1643-1644. (b) Charbonnie`re, L.; Ziessel, R.; Montalti,
M.; Prodi, L.; Zaccheroni, N.; Boehme, C.; Wipff, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 7779-7788. (c) Atkinson, P.; Bretonniere, Y.; Parker, D. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 438-439.
(7) (a) Hemmila´, I.; Mukkala, V.-M. Crit. ReV. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2001, 38, 441-
519. (b) Lei, W.; Du¨rkop, A.; Lin, Z.; Wu, M.; Wolfbeis, O. S. Microchim.
Acta 2003, 143, 269-274.
(8) (a) Selvin, P. R. Annu. ReV. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2002, 31, 275-302.
(b) Lee, Y. C. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 297, 123-127. (c) Johansson, M. K.;
Cook, R. M.; Xu, J.; Raymond, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16451-
16455.
(9) (a) Yuan, J.; Wang, G.; Majima, K.; Matsumoto, K. Anal. Chem. 2001,
73, 1869-1876. (b) Mathis, G. Clin. Chem. 1993, 39, 1953-1959.
(10) (a) Hemmila¨, I.; Webb, S. Drug DiscoV. Today 1997, 9, 373-381. (b)
Karvinen, J.; Hurskainen, P.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Burns, D.; Warrior, U.;
Hemmila¨, I. J. Biomol. Screen. 2002, 7, 223-231. (c) Pre´audat, M.; Ouled-
Diaf, J.; Alpha-Bazin, B.; Mathis, G.; Mitsugi, T.; Aono, Y.; Takahashi,
K.; Takemoto, H. J. Biomol. Screen. 2002, 7, 267-274.
(15) (a) de Sousa, M.; Kluciar, M.; Abad, S.; Miranda, M. A.; de Castro, B.;
Pischel, U. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2004, 3, 639-642. (b) Bobba, G.;
Frias, J. C.; Parker, D. Chem. Commun. 2002, 890-891. (c) Best, M. D.;
Anslyn, E. V. Chem.sEur. J. 2003, 9, 51-57. (d) Lee, K.; Dzubeck, V.;
Latshaw, L.; Schneider, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13616-13617.
(e) Hamblin, J.; Abboyi, N.; Lowe, M. P. Chem. Commun. 2005, 657-
659.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 21, 2006 6939