SCHEME 3
which gave the coupling product 6a, substituted allylic
bromides such as cinnamyl bromide gave a complex
mixture under the similar reaction conditions.7 Thus,
allylic phosphates rather than bromides are recom-
mended as the partner for the present coupling reaction
not only due to the reactivity but also due to availability
and ease of preparation.10 As shown in Table 1, with the
substituted allylic phosphates, SN2′ products 6 reacted
at the R-position of the zirconium species 4 were exclu-
sively formed in good yields, even in the case of termi-
nally disubstituted primary allylic phosphates (entries
4-6).9d,11,12 A moderate E selectivity of the coupling
product 6b (E/Z ) 2) was observed with the secondary
allylic phosphate (entry 4). No coupling product was
obtained with primary alkyl iodides, benzyl bromide and
alkenyl iodides. Sterically bulky geminal alkoxyl substi-
tutents in the dialkoxyallyic copper species effects the
selective coupling at the R-position and at the same time
its relatively low reactivity. This would be a sharp
contrast to monosubstituted allylic cuprate such as
cinnamyl derivative, which reacted with primary alkyl
halide exclusively at the γ-position.9g
TABLE 1. CuCN-Mediated Coupling Reaction of 4 with
Allylic Substratea
yieldb
entry
R1
R2
R3
X
6
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
H
H
H
H
H
Br
6a
72
83
0
H
H
H
H
H
OP(O)(OEt)2 6a
OAc or OBz 6a
H
H
CH3
PhCH2CH2 OP(O)(OEt)2 6b
81c
74
96
H
H
OP(O)(OEt)2 6c
OP(O)(OEt)2 6d
PhCH2CH2 CH3
a Solvent: toluene-THF (1:3); 1 equiv of CuCN. b Isolated yield.
c E/Z ) 2.0.
In these coupling reactions conducted in a mixture of
THF and toluene (3-4:1 v/v) or in THF, the efficiency of
CuCN as compared with the other commonly used Cu(I)
salts such as CuI, CuI‚2LiCl, CuBr, CuBr‚Me2S, or CuCl
was remarkable to obtain the desired products 6.13
Furthermore, the reaction temperature seemed to be a
crucial factor for the Cu(I)-mediated coupling reactions
examined here. When the temperature rose to about -20
°C after addition of CuCN (1 equiv) to a yellowish solution
of dialkoxyallylic zirconium 46 in THF-toluene at -78
°C, the reaction mixture changed to a green-colored clear
solution. When this green solution stood at room tem-
perature (ca 25 °C), the color gradually changed from
green to dark deep yellow and at the same time black
precipitates such as copper mirror appeared on the flask
wall. Addition of allyl phosphate at this stage resulted
in the recovery of the phosphate without the formation
of the coupling product. Thus, the observed color change
may indicate that the copper species has a short lifetime
at room temperature. With allylic phosphates 5, coupling
reaction hardly proceeded at low temperature below -30
°C and very slowly at -10 to 0 °C. Thus, the reactivity
of the copper species formed from 4 by Zr-to-Cu trans-
metalation using CuCN (1 equiv) seemed considerably
low, and finally, for the coupling reaction we optimized
the reaction temperature at 0-15 °C and reaction time
within about 10 h. According to Lipshutz’s report on
cuprate-mediated coupling reaction of allylic zirconium,9g
we examined transmetalation by higher order cuprate
the reaction conditions the zirconium species 4 can act
as an R,â-unsaturated acyl anion equivalent and gem-
dialkoxycyclopropyl anion equivalent, respectively.6,8 Since
the coupling reaction of 4 with allylic phosphates or acid
chlorides did not proceed without CuCN, we believe that
the cross-coupling reaction should proceed through Zr-
to-Cu transmetalation generating dialkoxyallylic copper
species as the plausible intermediate.9 Further study of
the present coupling reaction has been made to see the
reactivity and regioselectivity with propargylic and al-
lenyl alcohol derivatives as well as stereochemical out-
come with chiral allylic and propargylic phosphates. The
results are reported in this paper.
Reaction with Allylic Substrates. Treatment of γ,γ-
dialkoxyallylic zirconium species 4, generated from tri-
ethyl orthoacrylate and zirconocene-butene complex in
toluene, with CuCN followed by the reaction with allylic
phosphates 5 in toluene-THF (1:3-4 v/v) proceeded at
the R-position of 4 in a highly SN2′ manner to give the
5-alkenoate 6 in good yields.7 Typical results are sum-
marized in Table 1. Allyl bromide and allyl diethyl
phosphate gave the coupling product 6a in 72% and 83%
yield, respectively, but allyl acetate or benzoate did not
afford the coupling product 6a; instead the starting ester
was recovered (entries 1-3). Contrary to allyl bromide
(8) For reaction of γ,γ-dialkoxyallylic zirconium species 4 with
carbonyl compounds, see: (a) Ito, H.; Kuroi, H.; Ding, H.; Taguchi, T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6623. (b) Ito, H.; Sato, A.; Taguchi, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3217. (c) Ito, H.; Sato, A.; Kusanagi, T.;
Taguchi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3397. See also ref 6.
(9) For examples of zirconium to copper transmetalation, see: (a)
Yoshifuji, M.; Loots, M. J.; Schwartz, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 1303.
(b) Wipf, P.; Smitrovitch, J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6494. (c)
Lipshutz, B. H.; Dimock, S. H. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5761. (d)
Venanzi, L. M.; Lehmann, R.; Keil, R.; Lipshutz, B. H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 5857. (e) Wipf. D. Synthesis 1993, 537. (f) Lipshutz, B.
H.; Wood, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12625. (g) Lipshutz, B.
H.; Bhandari, A.; Lindsley, C.; Keil, R.; Wood, M. R. Pure Appl. Chem.
1994, 66, 1493. (h) Lipshutz, B. H.; Segi, M. Tetrahedron 1995, 51,
4407. (i) Fleming, S.; Kabbara, J.; Nickiseh, K.; Westermann,; Mohr,
J. Synlett 1995, 183. (j) Wipf, P.; Jahn, H. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 12853.
(k) Takahashi, T.; Shen, B.; Nakajima, K.; Xi, Z. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 8706. (l) Hanzawa, Y.; Narita, K.; Taguchi, T. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 109.
(10) Miller, J. A.; Wood, H. C. S. J. Chem. Soc. 1968, 1837.
(11) For examples of allylic cuprate reactions, see: (a) Lipshutz, B.
H.; Elworthy, T. R. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 1695. (b) Lipshutz, B. H.;
Ellsworth, E. L.; Dimock, S. H.; Smith, R. A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1990, 112, 4404. (c) Yanagisawa, A.; Noritake, Y.; Nomura, N.;
Yamamoto, H. Synlett 1991, 251. See also: (d) Yamamoto, Y.; Asao,
N. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2207.
(12) For reviews of organocopper reagents, see: (a) Lipshutz, B. H.;
Sengupta, S. Org. React. 1992, 41, 135. (b) Posner, G. H. Org. React.
1975, 22, 253.
(13) Efficiency of CuCN as a precursor for cuprate formation was
reported. (a) Bertz, S. H.; Gibson, C. P.; Dabbagh, G. Tetrahedron Lett.
1987, 28, 4251. (b) Tseng, C. C.; Paisley, S. D.; Goering, H. L. J. Org.
Chem. 1986, 51, 2884. (c) Tseng, C. C.; Yen, S.-J. D.; Goering, H. L. J.
Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2892. See also ref 9i.
710 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 2, 2005