2
K. Mizoi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
results are supported by the hydrolysis mechanism of CESs.1
Hydrolysis reaction of CESs are involving the serine ester interme-
diate. This intermediate can be attacked by the phenoxide or alkox-
ide ion, instead of water, and then it proceed to the inverse
reaction. Since phenoxide ion has a lower nucleophilic activity
than alkoxide ion, the inverse reaction tends to not occur. There-
fore, esters (2i–k) have a high hydrolytic activity despite having
sterically–bulky aryl group in HLM and HIM. On the other hand,
lactone (2l) was hardly hydrolyzed in either HLM or HIM.
In contrast, the hydrolytic activity of these esters (2a, 2c)
toward HIM was increased in relation to chain length. We have
already reported that human CES1A was highly expressed in the
liver and that human CES2A was highly expressed in the small
intestine.1 The substrate specificities of CES1 and CES2 are signifi-
cantly different. CES1 isozymes mainly hydrolyze a substrate with
a small alcohol group and large acyl group, whereas CES2 isozymes
hydrolyze a substrate with a small acyl group and large alcohol
group.1,23 Our results for linear aliphatic esters are in agreement
with the theory of substrate specificity of CESs. From the above
results, since these ester compounds (2a–k) have hydrolytic activ-
ity in HLM, they may undergo metabolic activation in the CES1
isozyme.
Scheme 1. Esterification of atorvastatin. (a) Isolated yield. (b) Reagents and
conditions: (A) R1OH, H2SO4 (cat), rt.
Furthermore, the results presented in Table 1 show that ator-
vastatin ethylester (2b) has the highest hydrolyzing activity ratio
of HLM/HIM. Hence, this compound has the best utility as a pro-
drug among these esters (2a–l) because this prodrug is required
to be metabolized in the human liver after it has been absorbed
in the human small intestine without being metabolized. We
obtained new findings regarding the structure activity relationship
for CESs, due to differences in the size and electron density of the
ester moiety for atorvastatin.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of atorvastatin ester via an acetal—protected intermediate. (a)
Isolated yield. (b) Reagents and conditions: (B) DMP, TsOH (cat), CH2Cl2, reflux. (C)
1 M NaOH aq, THF, rt. (D) (1) R1OH, EDC, DMAP, CH2Cl2, rt. (2) 1 M HCl aq, MeOH, rt.
However, there was no evidence that the ester compounds were
activated by CESs because these metabolic reactions were per-
formed in microsomes that contained various enzymes. Finally,
we compared the hydrolyzing activities of several CESs including
human CES1b, human CES1c, human CES2, and human arylac-
etamide deacetylase (AADAC). Esters 2a, 2f, and 2j, which showed
the highest activity among the aliphatic esters (2a–e, 2h, 2l), the
allylic or benzylic esters (2f, 2g), and the aromatic esters (2i–k),
respectively, were used as a substrate. As shown in Figure 2, the
metabolic activity of these esters (2a, 2f, 2j) was specific to CES1.
This result corresponds to previously reported observations.1,23 In
addition, it has been reported that AADAC is expressed in the
human liver and gastrointestinal tissues. The characteristic of
AADAC is that it recognizes the substrates including an N-ary-
lamide and/or ester with a small acyl group and large alcohol
group.23,24 Accordingly, it was appropriate result that these esters
(2a, 2f, 2j) having a small alcohol group had low hydrolytic activity
in the presence of AADAC. From these results, it is suggested that
the hydrolysis experiment of esters (2a, 2f, 2j) in HLM were selec-
tively hydrolyzed by CES1.
Figure 1. Enzyme activity assays of microsomes. Values are means S.D. (n = 3).
whether human liver microsomes (HLM) and/or human small
intestine microsomes (HIM), tissues that express major CES iso-
zymes, have hydrolytic activity. The results are summarized in Fig-
ure 1. The hydrolytic activity of primary linear aliphatic esters (2a–
e) was reduced in accordance with a linear increase in HLM. It was
presumed that this result was caused by steric repulsion of access
to the active pocket or nucleophilic attack of water. Especially,
despite a difference of one carbon atom, hydrolytic activity was
significantly different compare with 2a and 2b. This result show
that even the tiny difference of alcohol group in ester structure
was recognized by CES1. This consideration is also supported by
the fact that hydrolytic activity of 2g was lower than that of 2f
for inversely correlated bulkiness despite the fact that there were
nearly equal electronic properties of 2f and 2g. The hydrolytic
activity of a secondary aliphatic ester (2h) was decreased in rela-
tion to bulkiness. Thus, we assume that these results, the biological
hydrolysis reaction and the chemical hydrolysis reaction of esters,
are correlated. We consider that high hydrolytic activity of the aro-
matic esters (2i–k) is natural because the phenoxide ion has higher
ability than the alkoxide ion for elimination. Furthermore, these
In conclusion, CESs have an important role in the metabolic
activation of prodrugs. There is the possibility that the ester com-
Table 1
Hydrolyzing activity ratio of HLM/HIMa
Ratio
Ratio
(HLM/HIM)
Compound R1=
(HLM/HIM) Compound R1=
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
–CH3
30.5
40.1
5.7
5.3
4.4
2g
2h
2i
2j
2k
2l
–Bn
–Cy
–Ph
–p-F-Ph
–p-OCH3-Ph 3.4
Lactone 1.7
9.1
4.9
3.8
1.9
–Et
–nBu
–Oc
–De
–Allyl
5.1
a
The data were calculated from Figure 1.