Published on Web 02/28/2008
The Mechanism for the Rhodium-Catalyzed Decarbonylation
of Aldehydes: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical
Study
Peter Fristrup,† Michael Kreis,† Anders Palmelund,† Per-Ola Norrby,‡ and
Robert Madsen*,†
Center for Sustainable and Green Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Building 201, Technical
UniVersity of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark, and Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of
Gothenburg, Kemigården 4, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
Received November 13, 2007; E-mail: rm@kemi.dtu.dk
Abstract: The mechanism for the rhodium-catalyzed decarbonylation of aldehydes was investigated by
experimental techniques (Hammett studies and kinetic isotope effects) and extended by a computational
study (DFT calculations). For both benzaldehyde and phenyl acetaldehyde derivatives, linear Hammett
plots were obtained with positive slopes of +0.79 and +0.43, respectively, which indicate a buildup of
negative charge in the selectivity-determining step. The kinetic isotope effects were similar for these
substrates (1.73 and 1.77 for benzaldehyde and phenyl acetaldehyde, respectively), indicating that similar
mechanisms are operating. A DFT (B3LYP) study of the catalytic cycle indicated a rapid oxidative addition
into the C(O)-H bond followed by a rate-limiting extrusion of CO and reductive elimination. The theoretical
kinetic isotope effects based on this mechanism were in excellent agreement with the experimental values
for both substrates, but only when migratory extrusion of CO was selected as the rate-determining step.
Introduction
couple of years later an increase in temperature allowed
substoichiometric amounts of the metal catalyst to be used.5
Reactions involving transfer of carbon monoxide via transition
metals (carbonylation,1 hydroformylation,2 and decarbonylation)
belong to the very heart of organometallic chemistry, but to
our knowledge, only the two former have been studied by
computational methodsspresumably owing to their established
industrial importance. As part of a continued effort toward the
development of more sustainable chemical transformations and,
in particular, the utilization of bioderived starting materials in
organic synthesis, we have turned our attention toward the
rhodium-mediated decarbonylation.3 In its stoichiometric form,
the reaction was discovered by Tsuji and Ohno in 1965,4 and a
In the more than 40 years that have passed since the discovery
of the reaction, there has been an ongoing interest in the
development of the methodology6 as well as its application in
synthesis.7,8 Significant progress toward a more efficient de-
carbonylation methodology was achieved by Doughty and
Pignolet in 1978 through the introduction of chelating bispho-
sphines as ligands for rhodium.9 The favored catalyst was found
to be [Rh(dppp)2]Cl, and this advancement was followed by a
(5) Ohno, K.; Tsuji, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 99–107.
(6) (a) Fessard, T. C.; Andrews, S. P.; Motoyoshi, H.; Carreira, E. M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 9331–9334. (b) Lee, H. W.; Chan,
A. S. C.; Kwong, F. Y. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2633–2635. (c) Beck,
C. M.; Rathmill, S. E.; Park, Y. J.; Chen, J.; Crabtree, R. H.; Liable-
Sands, L. M.; Rheingold, A. L. Organometallics 1999, 18, 5311–5317.
(d) O’Connor, J. M.; Ma, J. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 5075–5077. (e)
Baldwin, J. E.; Barden, T. C.; Pugh, R. L.; Widdison, W. C. J. Org.
Chem. 1987, 52, 3303–3307.
† Technical University of Denmark.
‡ University of Gothenburg.
(1) Monsanto process (carbonylation of methanol): (a) Cheong, M.;
Ziegler, T. Organometallics 2005, 24, 3053–3058. (b) Feliz, M.;
Freixa, Z.; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M.; Bo, C. Organometallics 2005,
24, 5718–5723. (c) Daura-Oller, E.; Poblet, J. M.; Bo, C. Dalton Trans.
2003, 92–98. (d) Kinnunen, T.; Laasonen, K. J. Organomet. Chem.
2003, 665, 150–155. (e) Cavallo, L.; Solà, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 12294–12302. (f) Ivanova, E. A.; Gisdakis, P.; Nasluzov, V. A.;
Rubailo, A. I.; Rösch, N. Organometallics 2001, 20, 1161–1174.
(2) Hydroformylation: (a) Sparta, M.; Børve, K. J.; Jensen, V. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8487–8499. (b) Gleich, D.; Hutter, J.
Chem.sEur. J. 2004, 10, 2435–2444. (c) Landis, C. R.; Uddin, J.
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2002, 729–742. (d) Carbó, J. J.; Maseras,
F.; Bo, C.; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
7630–7637. (e) Alagona, G.; Ghio, C.; Lazzaroni, R.; Settambolo, R.
Organometallics 2001, 20, 5394–5404. (f) Decker, S. A.; Cundari,
T. R. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 635, 132–141. (g) Schmid, R.;
Herrman, W. A.; Frenking, G. Organometallics 1997, 16, 701–708.
(3) For a recent review on rhodium-catalyzed C-C bond cleavage
reactions, see: Necas, D.; Kotora, M. Curr. Org. Chem. 2007, 11,
1566–1591.
(7) For recent applications in total synthesis, see: (a) Padwa, A.; Zhang,
H. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2570–2582. (b) Malerich, J. P.; Maimone,
T. J.; Elliott, G. I.; Trauner, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6276–
6283. (c) Harmata, M.; Wacharasindhu, S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2563–
2565. (d) Weatherhead, G. S.; Cortez, G. A.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda,
A. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5805–5809. (e) Banwell,
M. G.; Coster, M. J.; Edwards, A. J.; Karunaratne, O. P.; Smith, J. A.;
Welling, L. L.; Willis, A. L. Aust. J. Chem. 2003, 56, 585–595. (f)
Allin, S. M.; James, S. L.; Elsegood, M. R. J.; Martin, W. P. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 9464–9467. (g) Kato, T.; Hoshikawa, M.; Yaguchi,
Y.; Izumi, K.; Uotsu, Y.; Sakai, K. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 9213–9222.
(h) Boeckman, R. K., Jr; Zhang, J.; Reeder, M. R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
3891–3894.
(8) For applications in carbohydrate chemistry, see: (a) Monrad, R. N.;
Madsen, R. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9782–9785. (b) Andrews, M. A.;
Gould, G. L.; Klaeren, S. A. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 5257–5264.
(9) Doughty, D. H.; Pignolet, L. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 7083–
7085.
(4) Tsuji, J.; Ohno, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1965, 3969–3971.
9
5206 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2008, 130, 5206–5215
10.1021/ja710270j CCC: $40.75
2008 American Chemical Society