B.K. Pradhan et al.: Large cryogenic storage of hydrogen in carbon nanotubes at low pressures
and capped at the edges by hydrogen atoms; (ii) a
few atmospheres. Previous reports in bundled SWNT of
8 wt% H2 storage at 77 K were found at considerable
higher pressure (approximately 100 atm). The remark-
able downshift we observed in the working H2 overpres-
sure (to approximately 2 atm) to achieve approximately
6 wt% H2 storage is not understood. Results of molecular
dynamics studies are presented that suggest there should
be an enhancement in the H2 binding energy associated
with a roughened nanotubes surface. The theoretical
binding energies for model rough surfaces are signifi-
cantly larger than for a planar graphene sheet but still much
smaller than the experimental value for the isosteric heat.
16-carbon atom planar molecule comprising four fused
hexagonal rings (denoted “6666”); (iii) a series of dis-
torted 14-carbon atom aromatic molecules composed
of two hexagons and two pentagons fused (“5665”). The
6666 molecule was fully relaxed; the 5665 series covered
a range of deviations from planarity to investigate the
heterogeneity of a roughened tube. In each case, we
placed a hydrogen molecule above the center of the car-
bon structure and allowed the adsorbate to relax. (We
also tested several different starting positions for the hy-
drogen molecule to more thoroughly explore possible
resting positions). The 6666 system, which models a flat
undistorted graphitic sheet, showed a H2 binding energy
0.072 eV, consistent with previous results for adsorption
on graphitic sheets.32 Both the 5665 series and the ex-
tracted patch from the disordered nanotube showed sub-
stantially increased adsorption energies: from 0.087 to
0.092 eV for the 5665 series; 0.095 eV for the extracted
nanotube patch.
To obtain an accurate measure of the actual enhance-
ment, these preliminary values were corrected for the
well-known LDA over binding of weakly bound molecu-
lar systems. To this end, we have computed accurate
first-principles diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) energet-
ics33 for a system of three fused pentagons, obtaining
0.09 and 0.07(1) eV in LDA and DMC, respectively. The
characteristic LDA overbinding in this case is moderate
(approximately 20 meV), which lends confidence to the
overall picture. With application of an approximately
20-meV overbinding correction, the adjusted binding en-
ergies range from approximately 52 meV (in 6666) to
approximately 75 meV (in the 20-atom patch from the
disordered tube). The computed enhancement in binding
energy due to surface roughening is found to be quite
substantial, i.e., 40–50%. The local roughening seems to
affect the hydrogen binding through a complex interplay
of aromaticity, bond distortion, and local coordination.
These modeling results suggest that the local hydrogen
physisorption binding energy can be substantially en-
hanced through distortions arising from nanometer-scale
structural constraints. Note that the physisorption energy
increases even though the carbon coordination of a hy-
drogen molecule decreases due to the local convexity of
the carbon sheet.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
P.C.E. acknowledges financial support from the Na-
tional Science Foundation, Pennsylvania State Univer-
sity, Materials Research Science and Engineering Center,
Office of Naval Research under Grant No. N00014-99-
1-0252. J.C.G. acknowledges the support of the United
States Department of Energy by the University of Cali-
fornia Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under
Contract No. W-7405-Eng-48. V.H.C. and D.S. acknowl-
edge the Army Research Office under Grant No.
DAAD19-99-1-0167.
REFERENCES
1. G.D. Berry and S.M. Aceves, Energy Fuels 12, 49 (1998).
2. S. Hynek, W. Fuller, and J. Bentley, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 22,
601 (1997).
3. F. Rodriguez-Reinoso and A. Linares-Solano, Chemistry and
Physics of Carbon, edited by P.A. Thrower (Marcel Dekker, Inc.,
New York, 1989), Vol. 22, p. 1.
4. R.K. Agarwal, J.S. Noh, J.A. Schwarz, and P. Davini, Carbon 25,
219 (1987).
5. A.C. Dillon, K.M. Jones, T.A. Bekkedahl, C.H. Kiang,
D.S. Bethune, and M.J. Heben, Nature 386, 377–379 (1997).
6. M.J. Heben, A.C. Dillon, T. Gennett, J.L. Alleman, P.A. Parilla,
K.M. Jones, and G.L. Hornyak, in Nanotube and Related
Materials, edited by A.M. Rao (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.,
633), p. 17.
7. C. Liu, Y.Y. Fan, M. Liu, H.T. Cong, H.M. Cheng, and
M.S. Dresselhaus, Science 286, 1127–1129 (1999).
8. P. Chen, X. Wu, J. Lin, and K.L. Tan, Science 285, 91–93 (1999).
9. C. Nutzenadel, H. Zuttel, D. Chartouni, and L. Schlaphach, Elec-
trochem. Solid State Lett. 2, 30 (1999).
10. N. Rajalakshmi, K.S. Dhathathreyan, A. Govindaraj, and
B.C. Satishkumar, Electrochim. Acta 45, 4511 (2000).
11. S.M. Lee, K.S. Park, Y.C. Choi, Y.S. Park, J.M. Bok, D.J. Bae,
K.S. Nahm, Y.G. Choi, S.C. Yu, N-g. Kim, T. Frauenheim, and
Y.H. Lee, Synth. Met. 113, 209 (2000).
IV. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, we have shown experimentally that the
wt% hydrogen storage in bundles of nanotubes at 77 K
falls in the range from approximately 1–6 wt% at ap-
proximately 2 atm, depending on the postsynthesis proc-
essing of SWNT materials. Aggressive HNO3 refluxing,
followed by a high T ∼ 1000 °C vacuum anneal (approxi-
mately 20 h) produces the highest storage >6 wt% at a
12. A. Chambers, C. Park, R.T.K. Baker, and N.M. Rodriguez,
J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 4253 (1998).
13. Y. Ye, C.C. Ahn, C. Witham, B. Fultz, J. Liu, A.G. Rinzler,
D. Colbert, K.A. Smith, and R.E. Smalley, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74,
2307 (1999).
14. R.T. Yang, Carbon 38, 623 (2000).
15. F.E. Pinkerton, B.G. Wicke, C.H. Olk, G.G. Tibbetts, G.P. Meisner,
M.S. Meyer, and J.F. Herbst, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 9460 (2000).
J. Mater. Res., Vol. 17, No. 9, Sep 2002
2215
Downloaded: 11 Mar 2015
IP address: 169.230.243.252