J. G. Zeevaart et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 1597–1599
1599
Table 2.
Entry Methanesulfonamide 5
ArBr
Pd(OAc)2 Ligand (mol %)
(mol %)
6 Yield (%) 7 Yield (%) Biphenyl yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
5b R1 = R2 = iPr
5b R1 = R2 = iPr
5b R1 = R2 = iPr
5b R1 = R2 = iPr
5b R1 = R2 = iPr
5b R1 = R2 = iPr
5b R1 = R2 = iPr
5b R1 = R2 = iPr
Bromobenzene
Bromobenzene
Bromobenzene
Bromobenzene
Bromobenzene
Bromobenzene
2-Bromotoluene
4-Bromoanisole
8
8
5
4
5
1
8
8
PPh3 (23)
PoTol3 (15)
BINAP (7.5)
PtBu3 (8)
6b, 34
6b, 9
7b, 14
7b, 0
7b, 9
15
3
6b, 45
6b, 46
6b, 14
6b, 34
6b, 50
6b, 52
6
7b, 4
<1
0
PCy3 (10)
PPh3 (23)
PPh3 (23)
PPh3 (23)
7b, 25
7b, 29
7b, 10
7b, 2
<1
Nd
3
9
5b R1 = R2 = iPr
4-Bromoanisole
Bromobenzene
5
6b, 34
7b, <1
3
Cy2P
8 (10)
PPh3 (23)
PPh3 (23)
PPh3 (23)
10
11
12
5c R1–R2–(CH2)4–
8
8
8
6c, 35
6d, 60
6e, 34
7c, 6
7d, 5
7e, 4
9
5d R1–R2 = –(CH2)2O(CH2)2– Bromobenzene
5
14
5e R1 = Me, R2 = Ph
Bromobenzene
4. Sakamoto, T.; Katoh, E.; Kondo, Y.; Yamanaka, H.
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1990, 38, 1513.
5. Ciufolini, M. A.; Qi, H.-B. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 4149.
6. Kashin, A. N.; Mitin, A. V.; Beletskaya, I. P.; Wife, R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 2539.
PPh3 loading did not lead to lower arylation activity but
instead led to the formation of similar amounts of the
mono- and di-arylated products 6 and 7 and suppression
of biphenyl formation (entry 6).
7. Bolm, C.; Hiroaki, H.; Verrucci, M. J. Organomet. Chem.
2003, 687, 444.
Using the more sterically hindered 2-bromotoluene in-
stead of bromobenzene in the enolate arylation reaction
with 5b also led to a marginal increase in selectivity of
the product ratios of 6b and 7b, while the unhindered
and electron-rich 4-bromoanisole led to almost exclu-
sively the mono-arylated product (entries 8 and 9).
These results indicate that not only steric factors, but
also electronic factors are important in determining
the selectivity and yield of this reaction.
8. Middleton, D. S.; Stobie, A. 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-1-naph-
thalenamine Compounds Useful in Therapy, Chem. Abstr.
133:222454, WO 00/51972; Pfizer Limited, 2000.
9. Skorcz, J. A.; Suh, J. T.; Germershausen, R. L. J.
Heterocycl. Chem. 1974, 11, 73.
10. Mitin, A. V.; Kashin, A. N.; Beletskaya, I. P. J. Organo-
met. Chem. 2004, 689, 1085.
´
11. Rodrıguez, N.; Cuenca, A.; Ramırez De Arellano, C.;
Medio-Simon, M.; Asensio, G. Org. Lett. 2004, 5, 1705.
´
´
12. Bordwell, F. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 456.
13. Shaughnessy, K. H.; Hamann, B. C.; Hartwig, J. F. J.
Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6546.
14. Lee, S.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3402.
15. Culkin, D. A.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
9330.
The problems concerning diarylation of the N,N-diiso-
propyl substituted sulfonamide 5b proved to be less
apparent on less sterically hindered sulfonamides. For
example, treatment of substrates 5c–e under the same
conditions used in entry 1 in Table 2 led to ratios of
the monoarylated product 6c–e to the diarylated prod-
ucts 7c–e exceeding 10:1 where the major side product
was biphenyl (entries 10–12).
16. Lee, S.; Beare, N. A.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 8410.
17. Moradi, W. A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 7996.
t
18. Fuꢀs highly stable Bu3PÆHBF4 salt was used (available
fromStremChemicals); Netherton, M. R.; Fu, G. C. Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 4295.
In conclusion, we have shown the first examples of the
a-arylation of methanesulfonamides under palladium,
catalysis conditions using phosphine ligands and sodium
t-butoxide as a base.19 The outcome of this reaction is
apparently governed by a mixture of steric and elec-
tronic effects, with the major by-products being biphenyl
and diarylation of the methanesulfonamide. Both aryl
bromides and iodides are active participants in this cou-
pling reaction.
19. General experimental procedure: A screw-capped Pyrex
tube (50 mL) was charged with sodium tert-butoxide
(3.5 mmol), 10 mL dry toluene (distilled from sodium),
methanesulfonamide 5 (2.2 mmol), and aryl bromide
(2.0 mmol). A warmed (ꢀ60 °C for 1 min) suspension of
Pd(OAc)2 (36 mg, 0.16 mmol, 8 mol %), triphenylphos-
phine (120 mg, 0.46 mmol, 23 mol %), 2-methoxynaphtha-
lene (an accurately weighed amount as internal standard)
and toluene (3 mL) were added. The tube was flushed with
nitrogen and heated to 100–110 °C in a Robosynthon
multireactor for 15–20 h. The conversion of the methane-
sulfonamide and aryl bromide was determined by GLC
analysis based on internal standard calculation. After a
total reaction time of 15–20 h the reaction mixture was
cooled and quenched by addition of water and dilute
hydrochloric acid followed by extraction into ethyl
acetate. After solvent removal, the residue was purified
by column chromatography to afford the products.
References and notes
1. For a review on this topic see: Culkin, D. A.; Hartwig, J.
F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 234.
2. Suzuki, H.; Yi, Q.; Inoue, J.; Kusume, K.; Ogawa, T.
Chem. Lett. 1987, 887.
3. Gorelik, M. V.; Titova, S. P.; Kanor, M. A. J. Org. Chem.
USSR (Engl. Transl.) 1992, 28, 1852.