C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
ring, we can estimate that the rings A-D bear the following positive
charges: 0.15 e (A), 0.46 e (B), 0.33 e (C), and 0.06 e (D). As
such, the asymmetric charge distribution further attests to the strong
electronic coupling within the “shifted” dimeric associates.11
These salient features of the QP cation radical can only be
rationalized, when one considers that the single charge is stabilized
by a quinoidal valence bond resonance structure. Such a resonance
form having a quinoidal structure leads to unequal bond distortions
in the aryl rings as well as planarization of the aryl rings for
effective π-conjugation with the magnitude of changes being the
highest in the central rings. It is worthwhile to note that a previously
reported ab initio SCF-LCAO-MO calculation of a lithium-doped
quaterphenyl anion radical showed a similar quinoidal distortion
as observed herein for the QP+•.14
In summary, the isolation and X-ray crystal structure determi-
-
Figure 2. The crystal structure of QP+•SbCl6 cation radical, with the
-
nation of QP+•SbCl6 provides unequivocal evidence for the
packing diagram showing that the toluene molecules are embedded between
the stacked dimeric pairs.
quinoidal stabilization of the cationic charge or polaron, which is
responsible for the high conductivities in PPP oligomers in their
doped state. The defect state induces regions of quinoidal confor-
mation and thus serves as a physical model for the insulator-metal
transition in PPP.3 Studies are underway for a more comprehensive
investigation of the optoelectronic properties of PPP oligomers and
will be reported in due course.
a close packing of the QP+• in dimeric pairs leads to a slight
longitudinal displacement with respect to each other to compensate
for the steric crowding caused by the terminal tert-butyl groups.
A closer look at the structural parameters of the cation radical
QP+•, along with a comparison with its neutral form, points to four
important observations:
Acknowledgment. We thank the National Science Foundation
(CAREER Award) for financial support.
Supporting Information Available: Preparation and spectral data
for QP and the X-ray structural data for the neutral QP, QP+•SbCl6
.
-
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
(i) The central bond distance of 1.440 Å between the two inner
benzene rings B and C in QP+• is considerably shorter than the
two peripheral C-C bonds between the outer rings and the
penultimate ones (i.e., 1.454 Å between rings A and B and 1.463
Å between rings C and D). This represents a contraction of the
central C-C bond (between ring B and C) by 5 pm in the oxidized
form in comparison to 1.1 pm in neutral QP.12 (ii) The longitudinal
bonds inside the rings are contracted, whereas the transverse bonds
are lengthened in comparison to neutral QP, indicative of a quinoidal
bond alteration.13 In numerical terms, the longitudinal bond
contraction results in bond lengths of 1.377 Å (ring A), 1.362 Å
(ring B), 1.368 Å (ring C), and 1.381 Å (ring D) from an average
of 1.38 Å in the neutral QP and a consequent lengthening of the
transverse bonds to 1.397/1.409 Å (ring A), 1.419/1.424 Å (ring
B), 1.421/1.413 Å (ring C), and 1.407/1.399 Å (ring D). The
magnitude of the bond contractions and expansions reaches a
maximum in the inner rings with the peripheral rings being less
affected. (iii) The torsional angles between the rings A/B/C are
∼0.1-15°, resulting in a nearly coplanar conformation. However,
for the peripheral ring D, this angle slightly increases primarily
due to the steric hindrance of the tert-butyl group of the adjacent
stacked molecule. Thus, the formation of the cation radical smooths
out the torsional motion of the interconnected aryl rings from their
typical values of ∼30° between the outer rings and ∼10° between
the central rings as in the neutral form, in order to allow effective
stabilization of the cationic charge by quinoidal distortions.13 (iv)
Considering the magnitude of quinoidal distortion to be a linear
function of the amount of charge allocated within the corresponding
References
(1) (a) Introduction to Molecular Electronics; Petty, M. C., Bryce, M. R.,
Bloor, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, 1995. (b) Maiya,
B. G.; Ramasarma, T. Curr. Sci. 2001, 80, 1523-1530.
(2) Hide, F.; Garcia, M. A. D.; Schwartz, B. J.; Heeger, A. J. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1997, 30, 430-436 and references therein.
(3) Shacklette, L. W.; Eckhardt, H.; Chance, R. R.; Miller, G. G.; Ivory, D.
M.; Baughman, R. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 73, 4098-4102.
(4) Baur, J. W.; Kim, S.; Balanda, P. B.; Reynolds, J. R.; Rubner, M. F. AdV.
Mater. 1998, 10, 1452-1455.
(5) Gale, D. M. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1978, 22, 1971-1976.
(6) (a) Bredas, J.-L.; Beljonne, D.; Coropceanu, V.; Cornil, J. Chem. ReV.
2004, 104, 4971-5003. (b) Martin, R. E.; Diederich, F. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1350-1377 and references therein.
(7) (a) Weiss, E. A.; Tauber, M. J.; Kelley, R. F.; Ahrens, M. J.; Ratner, M.
A.; Wasielewski, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11842-11850. (b)
Dance, Z. E. X.; Mi, Q.; McCamant, D. W.; Ahrens, M. J.; Ratner, M.
A.; Wasielewski, M. R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 25163-25173. (c)
Sun, D.; Lindeman, S. V.; Rathore, R.; Kochi, J. K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 2001, 1585-1594.
(8) Tolbert, L. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 561-568 and references therein.
(9) The cation radicals of oligothiophenes, viologens, and Wurster’s blue have
been known to show shifts in the absorption bands at higher concentrations
due to the formation of π-dimers; however, the QP+• did not show any
change in its absorption spectra even when the concentration was increased
10-fold.
(10) (a) Mah, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Hayashi, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 297-
300. (b) Ueda, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1968, 41, 2578-2586.
(11) The cation radical dimer pair in the solid state are most likely stabilized
via a charge-resonance process, i.e., QP+• + QP+• T QP++ + QP. For
example, see: Kochi, J. K.; Rathore, R.; Le Magueres, P. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 6826-6836.
(12) Baudour, J.-L.; De´lugeard, Y.; Rivet, P. Acta Crystallogr. 1978, B34, 625-
628.
(13) Rubio, M.; Mercha´n, M.; Ort´ı, E. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 14980-14987.
(14) Bre´das, J. L.; The´mans, B.; Andre´, J. M. Phys. ReV. B 1982, 26,
6000-6002.
JA0720356
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 26, 2007 8071