C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
(Mrp protein, NP_372281) from Staphylococcus aureus nested with
a LPNTG sequence motif in its carboxy terminal region. We
employed HPLC assays and MALDI-TOF to investigate the ligation
of tobramycin to Mrp (Supporting Information Figures 8 and 9).
Incubation of Mrp alone with sortase led to generation of two
fragments expected from hydrolysis at the T-G peptide bond.
However, incubation of the protein with sortase in the presence of
tobramycin produced specific conjugate (Mrp-LPNT-tobramycin)
with a yield of more than 45% in 6 h.
In summary, our work demonstrates that sortase can transfer
peptide substrates to oligosaccharides appended with a 6-deoxy-
6-aminohexose moiety in a selective manner as that of an
oligoglycine sequence. Such an enzymatic activity of peptide-sugar
ligation, presumably promiscuous in origin for sortase, is hitherto
unknown. This robust reaction provides a simple and straightforward
method for covalent ligation of a prefabricated sugar containing a
6-aminohexose tag to synthetic peptides and expressed proteins
encoded with a C-terminal LPXTG sortase recognition sequence.
We envision several biotechnological applications of this methodol-
ogy, including generation of novel glycopeptide-based immuno-
vaccines comprising oligosaccharides substituted with multiple
peptides and glycolabeling of proteins. Besides, the facile assembly
of aminoglycoside antibiotic conjugates offers tremendous pos-
sibilities of generating new RNA ligands and therapeutics. The work
on anti-HIV activity of antibiotics-Tat/Rev conjugates is in
progress.
Figure 1. (a) General peptide ligation reaction catalyzed by sortase. (b)
LPXTG peptide substrates used in the study. (c) Amino sugars used in the
study. The 6-amino site is shown in blue.
Acknowledgment. We thank Gokhale Laboratory and Dr. P.
Sahai for help with mass measurements. This work was supported
by NII core, National Bioscience Award, and DBT-ICMR grants
to R.P.R. from the Department of Biotechnology, India.
Supporting Information Available: Peptide-sugar ligations,
product characterization, and RNA binding data. This material is
References
(1) Pratt, M. R.; Bertozzi, C. R. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2005, 34, 58-68.
(2) Griffith, B. R.; Langenhan, J. M.; Thorson, J. S. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.
2005, 16, 622-630.
(3) Varki, A. Glycobiology 1993, 3, 97-130.
(4) Doores, K. J.; Gamblin, D. P.; Davis, B. G. Chemistry 2006, 12, 656-
665.
(5) Bennett, C. S.; Wong, C.-H. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007, 36, 1227-1238.
(6) Blanchard, S.; Thorson, J. S. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2006, 10, 263-
271.
Figure 2. Sortase-catalyzed conjugation of YALPETGK model peptide
to aminoglycosides. Reversed phase HPLC profiles 1 and 2 are peptide
samples in the absence and presence of sortase, respectively. Chromatograms
numbered 3 to 8 represent reactions of peptide with aminoglycoside
antibiotics. The peptide-antibiotics conjugate is indicated by an arrow.
(7) Li, B.; Zeng, Y.; Hauser, S.; Song, H.; Wang, L. X. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 9692-9693.
(8) Mazmanian, S. K.; Liu, G.; Ton-That, H.; Schneewind, O. Science 1999,
285, 760-763.
(9) Perry, A. M.; Ton-That, H.; Mazmanian, S. K.; Schneewind, O. J. Biol.
Chem. 2002, 277, 16241-16248.
arginine-rich sequences derived from Tat and Rev17,18 or even a
nonaarginine peptide mimic, have been shown to interfere with
Tat-TAR or Rev-RRE interactions, leading to inhibition of virus
replication.19 We prepared conjugates of nonaarginine (4) or a Rev
sequence (5) with several antibiotics (Supporting Information Table
2 and Figure 6). We used the neomycin-Rev conjugate, as a test
case, for evaluating the extent of RRE RNA binding. The gel
retardation assays (Supporting Information Figure 7) yielded a RRE
binding affinity (Kd) of 9.3 nM for the conjugate as compared to
114.3 nM for the Rev peptide, suggesting about 10-fold or more
improvement of RNA binding in the conjugate. Together, these
results demonstrate the utility of sortase for generating useful
conjugates.
(10) Marraffini, L. A.; Dedent, A. C.; Schneewind, O. Microbiol. Mol. Biol.
ReV. 2006, 70, 192-221.
(11) Mao, H.; Hart, S. A.; Schink, A.; Pollok, B. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 2670-2671.
(12) Pritz, S.; Wolf, Y.; Kraetke, O.; Klose, J.; Bienert, M.; Beyermann, M. J.
Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3909-3912.
(13) Parthasarathy, R.; Subramanian, S.; Boder, E. T. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007,
18, 469-476.
(14) Huang, X.; Aulabaugh, A.; Ding, W.; Kapoor, B.; Alksne, L.; Tabei, K.;
Ellestad, G. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 11307-11315.
(15) Busscher, G. F.; Rutjes, F. P.; van Delft, F. L. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105,
775-791.
(16) Zapp, M. L.; Stern, S.; Green, M. R. Cell 1993, 74, 969-978.
(17) Litovchick, A.; Lapidot, A.; Eisenstein, M.; Kalinkovich, A.; Borkow,
G. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 15612-15623.
(18) Calnan, B. J.; Tidor, B.; Biancalana, S.; Hudson, D.; Frankel, A. D. Science
1991, 252, 1167-1171.
(19) Luedtke, N. W.; Baker, T. J.; Goodman, M.; Tor, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 12035-12036.
Finally, we tested the feasibility of using sortase for site-specific
conjugation of sugars to proteins. For this, we expressed a protein
JA077358G
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 7, 2008 2133