C.R. Nakaie et al. / Bioorganic Chemistry 39 (2011) 101–109
109
[15] E.M. Cilli, G.N. Jubilut, S.C.F. Ribeiro, E. Oliveira, C.R. Nakaie, J. Braz. Chem. Soc.
11 (2000) 474–478.
[16] L. Malavolta, E. Oliveira, E.M. Cilli, C.R. Nakaie, Tetrahedron 58 (2002) 4383–
4394.
[17] L. Malavolta, C.R. Nakaie, Tetrahedron 60 (2004) 9417–9424.
[18] V. Gutmann, The Donor–Acceptor Approach to Molecular Interactions, Plenum
Press, New York, 1978.
[19] J. Furrer, M. Piotto, M. Bourdonneau, D. Limal, G. Guichard, K. Elbayed, J. Raya,
J.P. Briand, A. Bianco, J Am Chem Soc. 123 (2001) 4130–4138.
[20] B. Yan, Acc. Chem. Res. 31 (1998) 621–630.
[21] A.R. Vaino, K.D. Janda, J. Comb. Chem. 2 (2000) 579–596.
[22] V.N.R. Pillai, M. Mutter, Acc. Chem. Res. 14 (1981) 22–130.
[23] E.M. Cilli, R. Marchetto, S. Schreier, C.R. Nakaie, Tetrahedron Lett. 38 (1997)
517–520.
[24] E.M. Cilli, R. Marchetto, S. Schreier, C.R. Nakaie, J. Org. Chem. 64 (1999) 9118–
9123.
In terms of potentials for the large scale SPPS with direct conse-
quence for the industrial application of the SPPS method, a recent
work [55] stressed adequately the main shortcomings still remain-
ing for optimization of the application of this unique synthesis
strategy. However, no mention was given to the highly loaded syn-
thesis procedure within those limitations existing in SPPS. The set
of results deriving from different approaches applied herein, al-
lowed to conclude that in many cases, the peptide synthesis in this
‘‘difficult’’ heavily loaded conditions which has been avoided since
the remarkable inception of SPPS strategy near five decades ago
[56] is feasible and that the valuable economical advantages pro-
ceeding from different approach must be considered.
[25] E. Oliveira, E.M. Cilli, A. Miranda, G.N. Jubilut, F. Alberício, D. Andreu, A.C.M.
Paiva, S. Schreier, M. Tominaga, C.R. Nakaie, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 21 (2002) 3686–
3694.
5. Conclusions
[26] R. Marchetto, E.M. Cilli, G.N. Jubilut, S. Schreier, C.R. Nakaie, J. Org. Chem. 70
(2005) 4561–4568.
[27] E.M. Cilli, E.F. Vicente, E. Crusca Jr., C.R. Nakaie, Tetrahedron Lett. 48 (2007)
5521–5524.
[28] A. Rassat, P. Rey, Bull. Soc. Chim. France 3 (1967) 815–817.
[29] C.R. Nakaie, S. Schreier, A.C.M. Paiva, Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 14 (1981) 173–180.
[30] R. Marchetto, S. Schreier, C.R. Nakaie, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1993) 11042–
11043.
[31] C. Toniolo, E. Valente, F. Formaggio, M. Crisma, G. Pilloni, C. Corvaja, A.
Toffoletti, G.V. Martinez, M.P. Hanson, G.L. Millhauser, C. George, J. Flippen-
Anderson, J. Peptide Sci. 1 (1995) 45–57.
[32] C.R. Nakaie, L. Malavolta, S. Schreier, E. Trovatti, R. Marchetto, Polymer 47
(2006) 4531–4536.
[33] L. Malavolta, E.F. Poletti, E.H. Silva, S. Schreier, C.R. Nakaie, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 9
(2008) 1321–1332.
[34] S.B.H. Kent, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 57 (1988) 957–989.
[35] R.R. Irani, C.F. Callis, in: Particle Size: Measurement, Interpretation and
Application, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1963.
[36] R. Marchetto, A. Etchegaray, C.R. Nakaie, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 3 (1992) 30–37.
[37] P.G. Pietta, P.F. Cavallo, K. Takahashi, G.R. Marshall, J. Org. Chem. 39 (1974) 44.
[38] G.R. Matsueda, J.M. Stewart, Peptides 2 (1981) 45–50.
[39] A.R. Mitchell, B.W. Erickson, M.N. Ryabtsev, R.S. Hodges, R.B. Merrifield, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 98 (1976) 7357–7362.
This work showed for the first time, a systematic evaluation of
peptide synthesis of a great variety of model peptide sequences
comparatively in low and highly loaded conditions. Several exper-
imental approaches with focus on the physicochemical aspects of
the solvation features of peptide-resin beads were developed and
the final topic correlated the collected information with those re-
lated with the final synthesis yield in this severe sterically hin-
dered chemical condition. One may conclude that, despite the
expected aggravation of the peptide-peptide interaction rendering
difficulties to the chain assembly within resin beads, the possibility
of carrying out coupling in very highly concentration reactants, due
to the use of highly substituted resins, seemed to help overcome
partially this reported shortcoming, thus allowing the peptide syn-
thesis in this unique and advantageous experimental procedure.
Acknowledgments
[40] R.S.H. Carvalho, D.A. Ianzer, L. Malavolta, M.M. Rodrigues, E.M. Cilli, C.R.
Nakaie, J. Chromatogr. B 817 (2005) 231–238.
We thank FAPESP, CNPq, CAPES and FADA for their financial
support. E.F.V. is CAPES PhD fellow and E.M.C., R.M. and C.R.N.
are recipients of CNPq research fellowships.
´
[41] J.B. Dame, J.L. Williams, T.F. McCutchan, J.L. Weber, R.A. Wirtz, W.T.
Hockmeyer, W.L. Maloy, J.D. Haynes, I. Schneider, D. Roberts, G.S. Sanders,
E.P. Reddy, C.L. Diggs, L.J. Miller, Science 225 (1984) 593–599.
[42] W.S. Hancock, D.J. Prescott, P.R. Vagelos, G.R. Marshall, J. Org. Chem. 38 (1973)
774–781.
References
[43] L. Oliveira, C.M. Costa-Neto, C.R. Nakaie, S. Schreier, S.I. Shimuta, A.C.M. Paiva,
Physiol Rev. 87 (2007) 565–592.
[44] S.W. Jones, Neurosci. Lett. 74 (1987) 309–314.
[45] J.P. Tam, Y.A. Lu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1995) 12058.
[46] M. Tomoi, W.T. Ford, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103 (1981) 3821–3828.
[47] D.J. Gordon, S.C. Meredith, Biochemistry 42 (2003) 475–485.
[48] L. Malavolta, M.R.S. Pinto, J.H. Cuvero, C.R. Nakaie, Protein Sci. 15 (2006) 431–
436.
[1] G. Barany, R.B. Merrifield, The Peptides 2 (1979) 1–284.
[2] G.B. Fields, R.L. Noble, Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 35 (1990) 161–214.
[3] S.A. Kates, F. Albericio, Coupling methods: solid-phase formation of amid and
easter bond, in: F. Albericio (Ed.), Solid-Phase Synthesis. A Practical Guide,
Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 2000, pp. 275–330.
[4] V.K. Sarin, S.B.H. Kent, R.B. Merrifield, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102 (1980) 5463–5470.
[5] G.B. Fields, C.G. Fields, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 (1991) 4202–4207.
[6] L.M. Varanda, M.T.M. Miranda, J. Peptide Res. 50 (1997) 102–108.
[7] S.C.F. Ribeiro, S. Schreier, C.R. Nakaie, E.M. Cilli, Tetrahedron Lett. 42 (2001)
3243–3246.
[8] W.A. Klis, J.M. Stewart, in: J.E. Rivier, G.R. Marshall (Eds.), Peptides: Structure
and Biology, Escom, Leiden, Netherlands, 1990, pp. 904–906.
[9] L.A. Carpino, G.Y. Han, Am. Chem. Soc. 92 (1970) 5748–5749.
[10] A.E. Faham, R.S. Funosas, F. Albericio, Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010) 3641–3649.
[11] C.O. Kappe, D. Dallinger, Nat. Rev. 5 (2006) 51–63.
[49] C.P. Taborda, C.R. Nakaie, E.M. Cilli, E.G. Rodrigues, L.S. Silva, M.F. Franco, L.R.
Travassos, Scand. J. Immunol. 59 (2004) 58–65.
[50] S. Coantic, G. Subra, J. Martinez, Int. J. Peptide Res. Ther. 14 (2008) 143–147.
[51] L.P. Miranda, W.D. Lubell, K.M. Halkes, T. Groth, M. Gortli, J. Rademann, C.H.
Gotfredsen, M. Meldal, J. Comb. Chem. 4 (2002) 523–529.
[52] K. Kumar, M. Rajasekharan, V.N. Pillai, B. Mattew, J. Peptide, Sci. 8 (2002) 183–
191.
[53] K.S. Lam, S.E. Salmon, E.M. Hersh, V.J. Hruby, W.M. Kazmiersky, R.J. Knapp,
Nature 354 (1991) 82–84.
[54] J. Bedford, C. Hyde, T. Johnson, J.J. Wen, D. Owen, M. Quibell, R.C. Sheppard, Int.
J. Peptide. Protein Res. 40 (1992) 300–307.
[12] M. Brandt, S. Gammeltoft, K.J. Jensen, Int. J. Peptide Res. Ther. 12 (2006) 349–
357.
[13] E.M. Cilli, E. Oliveira, R. Marchetto, C.R. Nakaie, J. Org. Chem. 81 (1996) 8992–
9000.
[14] E. Oliveira, A. Miranda, F. Albericio, D. Andreu, A.C.M. Paiva, C.R. Nakaie, M.
Tominaga, J. Peptide Res. 49 (1997) 300–307.
[55] M. Verlander, Int. J. Peptide Res. Ther. 13 (2007) 75–82.
[56] R.B.J. Merrifield, Am. Chem. Soc. 85 (1963) 2149–2154.