HIGHLY EFFICIENT Pt-CATALYST SUPPORTED ON MESOPOROUS
2375
EXPERIMENTAL
Support Synthesis
the analytic measurements [16–18]. Before measure-
ments, the samples were mounted on a 3 mm copper
grid and fixed in a grid holder. The samples morphol-
ogy was studied using a Hitachi HT7700 transmission
electron microscope. Images were acquired in a
bright-field TEM mode at a 100 kV accelerating volt-
age.
The preparation of mixed oxide substrates CeO –
2
ZrO was carried out by a coprecipitation method [15].
2
The precursor for the zirconium solution was
ZrO(NO ) · xH O (99.5%; Acros Organics) and
3
2
2
(
NH ) Ce(NO ) (98+%, Alfa Aesar) was used as a
4 2 3 6
Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS-
SEM). The samples morphology was studied under
native conditions to exclude metal coating surface
precursor for the cerium containing solution. For the
synthesis of cerium-zirconium supports with the
molar ratio Ce : Zr = 0.8 : 0.2, simultaneous co-pre-
cipitation of cerium and zirconium hydroxides from effects. The observations were carried out using a
working solutions in the presence of ammonium Hitachi SU8000 field-emission scanning electron
hydroxide was performed.
microscope (FE-SEM). Images were acquired in a
secondary electron mode at a 10, 15, and 20 kV accel-
erating voltage and at a working distance 15 mm. EDX
A solution containing 0.73 mol of the cerium pre-
cursor was prepared by dissolving the sample in water
and then diluted with isopropanol (99%) in a 1.7 : 1 studies were carried out using an Oxford Instruments
ratio. After dilution, the resulting solution was stirred X-max EDX system.
at room temperature for 1 h.
X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD). The phase com-
position of the samples and the size of the primary
To obtain a solution containing 0.19 mol of the zir-
conium precursor, the sample was dissolved in a 2.3 M
crystals of crystalline phases were determined by the
solution of oxalic acid. The resulting solution was
XRD method. X-ray diffraction patterns were
diluted with isopropanol (99%) in a 1 : 1 (v/v) ratio.
recorded on a DRON-2 device in Ni-filtered CuK
α
After dilution, the solution was stirred at room tem-
radiation (λ = 0.1542 nm) in a step-scan mode (in
perature for 1 hour. To co-precipitate cerium and zir-
0.02° increments) in the range 2θ = 10°–80°. The
conium hydroxides, the working solutions were
poured off under vigorous stirring and an ammonia
solution (23 wt %) was added until pH reached 9.15.
identification of the phase composition was carried
out by matching the position and intensity of the lines
The resulting suspension was stirred for 30 min, after on the X-ray diffraction pattern with the ICDD data
which the precipitate was separated, washed with (International Data Center for X-ray Diffraction).
deionized H O and dried for 12 h at 70°C, followed by The coherent scattering domain size was calculated
2
calcination at 400°C in a closed crucible for 4 h.
from the broadening of the X-ray diffraction lines in
accordance with the Scherer equation.
Catalyst Synthesis
Temperature-programmed reduction with hydrogen
(ТPR-Н ). TPR measurements were carried out on a
2
Synthesis of a catalyst with a platinum content of
laboratory constructed flow-system equipped with a
gas purification system, a quartz U-shaped reactor, a
water vapor trap, and a thermal conductivity detector.
The detector was calibrated by reduction of a CuO
sample (Aldrich-Chemie GmbH, 99%) treated in an
Ar flow at 300°C. All experiments were conducted
with a water vapor trap, which was cooled to –100°C.
A sample of 1% Pt/CZ-N with a weight of 150 mg was
treated in an Ar flow at 250°C for 90 min. The catalyst
was then cooled to –50°C using a mixture of ethanol
and liquid nitrogen as a cooling mixture and thermo-
1
wt % was performed by the method of pH-controlled
precipitation of the precursor. An aqueous solution of
H PtCl (50 mL) with a concentration of 0.46 mM was
2
6
prepared, after that an aqua solution of Na CO
2
3
(
0.1 M) was added until pH 7. Then, a sample of
CeO –ZrO was added and the suspension was stirred
2
2
for 30 min without heating and then the suspension
was stirred for 3 h at 60°C. The completeness of Pt
deposition was checked by the qualitative reaction of
n+
Pt ions in the parent solution with KI and HCl. In all
cases, we observed a complete Pt deposition onto the
support surface. The precipitate was then separated statted at this temperature for 60–90 min. Heating
and washed with deionized H O, dried under vacuum from –50 to 25°C was carried out in a flow of a gas
2
using a rotary evaporator until complete removal of mixture of 4.6% H /Ar (30 mL/min) at a heating rate
2
moisture. The resulting catalyst was reduced in a flow of 10 deg/min. The sample was kept at room tempera-
of hydrogen at 250°C for 2 h. The catalyst was desig- ture (25°C) until the uptake of hydrogen ceased.
nated as 1Pt/CZ-N.
Specific surface area and porosity. N adsorption-
2
desorption isotherms were obtained on an ASAP 2020
Physicochemical Characterization
Plus “Micromeritics” sorptometer at 77 K. The BET
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A target- method was used to calculate the specific surface area
oriented approach was utilized for the optimization of (SBET) of the sample. The total pore volume (V) was
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A Vol. 92 No. 12 2018