DECANE OXIDATION IN A SHOCK TUBE
713
of τ, the ignition delay versus the fuel concentra-
tion. Here, we get a good estimation of the lean and
the rich limits of combustion of n-decane and we are
reminded again that the Lifshitz equation cannot be
used outside the experimental window, but the mod-
eling scheme will show us the correct behavior. The
correct width of the U-shaped line can be seen only
with a full mechanism like the one we used and any
attempt to reduce the mechanism means a narrower
U [15].
5. Battin-Leclerc, F.; Fournet, R.; Glaude, P. A.; Judenherc,
B.; Warth, V.; Coˆme, G. M.; Scacchi, G. Proc Combust
Inst 2000, 28, 1597–1605.
6. Lindstedt, R. P.;Maurice, L. Q. JPropulsionPower2000,
16, 187–195.
7. Zeppieri, S. P.; Klotz, S. D.; Dryer, F. L. Proc Combust
Inst 2000, 28, 1587–1595.
8. Bikas, G.; Peters, N. Combust Flame 2001, 126, 1456–
1475.
9. Eliott, I.; Ingham, D. B.; Kyne, A. G.; Mera, N. S.;
Pourkashanian, M.; Wilson, C. W. Proc Combust Inst
2004, 30, to be published.
10. Lifshitz, A. Ignition Delay Times in Handbook of
Shock-Waves; Academic Press: New York, 2001; Vol. 3,
pp. 211–256.
CONCLUSION
11. Horning, D. C.; Davidson, D. F.; Hanson R. K. J Propul-
sion Power 2001, 18, 363–371.
An experimental study of ignition of n-decane was
presented and compared with a number of proposed
kinetic mechanisms found in the literature. None of
the models fitted well our findings, and none of the
experimental studies from the literature could be com-
pared with ours because of differences of presentation.
In order to fit a mechanism to our experiments, many
changes in individual rates were necessary. Of spe-
cial disappointment was the Exgas automatic model
that turned out to be the least fitting to our experi-
ments.
12. Feiweger, K.; Pfahl, U.; Adomeit, G. In Proceedings
of the 20th International Symposium on Shock Waves,
Pasadena, CA, July 1995 (1996); Vol. 2, pp. 929–934.
thermodynamics.
14. Steele, W. V.; Chirico, R. D.; Cowell, A. B.; Knipmeyer,
S. E.; Nguyen, A. J. Chem Eng Data 2002, 47, 667–688;
ibid 700–714; ibid 725–739.
15. Burcat, A.; Dvinyaninov, M. In Shock Waves@
Marseille, Vol. 2, Proccedings of 19th Symposium
(International) on Shock Wave Marseille, 1993; Burn,
R.; Dumitrescu, L. V. (Eds.); Springer-Verlag: Berlin,
1995, pp. 197–202.
16. Westbrook, C. K.; Pitz, W. J.; Thornton, M. M.; Malte,
P. C. Comb Flame 1988, 72, 45–62.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
17. Pitz, W. J.; Westbrook, C. K.; Leppard, W. R. SAE Trans-
action, Section 4, paper #912315, 1991.
18. Chakir, A.; Belliman, M.; Boettner, J. C; Cathonet, M.
Int J Chem Kinet 1992, 24, 385–410.
19. (a) Chakir, A.; Bellimam, M.; Cathonet, M.; Boettner,
J. C. Combust Sci Technol 1991, 77, 239; (b) Tamura,
T. M. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Report,
1987.
20. Lindstedt, R. P.; Maurice, L. Q. Combust Sci Technol
1995, 107, 317–353.
1. Dagaut, P.; Reuillion, M.; Boettner, J. C.; Cathonnet, M.
Proc Combust Inst 1994, 25, 919–926.
2. Ranzi, E.; Sogaro, A.; Gaffuri, P.; Pennati, G.; West-
brook, C. K.; Pitz, W. J. Combust Flame 1994,
combustion home.html.
3. Nehse, M.; Warnatz, J.; Chevalier, C. Proc Combust Inst
1996, 26, 773–780.
4. Glaude, P. A.; Warth, V.; Fournet, R.; Battin-Leclerc, F.;
Scacchi, G.; Coˆme, G. M. Int J Chem Kinet 1998, 30,
949–959.
21. Held, T. J.; Marchese, A. J.; Dryer, F. L. Combust Sci
Technol 1997, 123, 107–146.
International Journal of Chemical Kinetics DOI 10.1002/kin