Y. Koito et al. / Catalysis Today 226 (2014) 198–203
203
functional theory (DFT) calculation suggests that lowest unoccu-
References
pied molecular orbital (LUMO) levels of Sc(OTf)3 and Y(OTf)3 were
estimated to be ca. −2.2 and −1.0 eV, respectively, from crystalline
Sc(OTf) ·9H O [21] and Y(OTf) ·9H O [22] structure. Higher HOMO
[
1] D. Schinzer, Selectivities in Lewis Acid Promoted Reactions, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989.
3
2
3
2
[2] H. Yamamoto, Lewis Acid in Organic Synthesis, Wiley, Weinheim, Germany,
2000.
[
[
[
[6] S. Kobayashi, K. Manabe, Acc. Chem. Res. 35 (2002) 209–217.
[
[
levels of pyruvic aldehyde and TMPO than that of H O means that
2
3] A. Corma, H. García, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 4307–4365.
4] S. Kobayashi, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1 (1999) 15–27.
5] S. Kobayashi, I. Hachiya, J. Org. Chem. 59 (1994) 3590–3596.
Lewis acid is bonded to nucleophiles such as 1,3-DHA, pyruvic
aldehyde, and TMPO in preference to H O. In addition, low LUMO
2
level of Sc(OTf)3 suggests that the interaction between Sc(OTf)3
7] S. Kobayashi, C. Ogawa, Chem. Eur. J. 12 (2006) 5954–5960.
8] S. Kobayashi, S. Nagayama, T. Busujima, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998)
and these nucleophiles is larger than that of Y(OTf) , due to small
3
HOMO–LUMO energy gap. Strong interaction of reactant molecules
with Sc(OTf)3 would form active Lewis acid–reactant complexes,
resulting in high catalytic performance.
8287–8288.
[9] Y. Hayashi, Y. Sasaki, Chem. Commun. (2005) 2716–2718.
[10] Y. Jiang, J. Huang, W. Dai, M. Hunger, Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 39 (2011)
116–141.
[
[
[
11] A. Zheng, S.J. Huang, S.B. Liu, F. Deng, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 (2011)
14889–14901.
12] Y. Chu, Z. Yu, A. Zheng, H. Fang, H. Zhang, S.J. Huang, S.B. Liu, F. Deng, J. Phys.
Chem. C 115 (2011) 7660–7667.
13] C.Y. Yang, C.C. Chang, N. Feng, S.J. Huang, A. Zheng, Y.C. Chang, K.C. Lee, F. Deng,
S.B. Liu, J. Anal. Sci. Tech. 2 (2011) A155–A158.
4
. Conclusion
The changes in the 31P NMR chemical shift and line width
by the formation of a TMPO–Lewis acid complex in water are
effective indicators to evaluate the catalytic performance of homo-
geneous water-tolerant Lewis acids in water. Sc(OTf) , ScCl , and
In(OTf)3 show 61, 51, and 96% yield for lactic acid formation,
respectively. High performance of ScCl , Sc(OTf) , and In(OTf)
was evident from the large chemical shift and broad line width
of the TMPO–Lewis acid complexes observed in the 31P NMR
spectra, which indicate the formation of stable reactant–Lewis
acid complexes in water. Similar HOMO level and electronic state
of TMPO to carbonyl group in reactant (1.3-DHA and pyruvic
aldehyde), in addition to 100% natural abundance of 31P atoms,
make TMPO as an effective probe molecule for the evaluation of
Lewis acid catalysis in water. Efficient activation of 1.3-DHA and
pyruvic aldehyde as well as TMPO in water by the Lewis acids
results in high catalytic performance for Lewis acid-catalyzed reac-
tions.
[14] M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheese-
man, J.A. Montgomery, Jr. T. Vreven, K.N. Kudin, J.C. Burant, J.M. Millam, S.S.
Iyengar, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G.A.
Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa,
M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X. Li, J.E. Knox, H.P.
Hratchian, J.B. Cross, V.Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R.E. Strat-
mann, O. Yazyev, A.J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J.W. Ochterski, P.Y. Ayala, K.
Morokuma, G.A. Voth, P. Salvador, J.J. Dannenberg, V.G. Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich,
A. D. Daniels, M.C. Strain, O. Farkas, D.K. Malick, A.D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari,
J.B. Foresman, J.V. Ortiz, Q. Cui, A.G. Baboul, S. Clifford, J. Cioslowski, B.B. Ste-
fanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R.L. Martin, D.J. Fox, T. Keith,
M.A. Al-Laham, C.Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P.M.W. Gill, B. John-
son, W. Chen, M.W. Wong, C. Gonzalez, J.A. Pople, Gaussian 03, Revision E.01,
Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA, 2004.
3
3
3
3
3
[
15] R. Dennington, T. Keith, J. Millam, Gauss View, Version 5, Semichem Inc.,
Shawnee Mission, KS, 2009.
[16] Y. Koito, K. Nakajima, M. Kitano, M. Hara, Chem. Lett. 42 (2013) 873–875.
[17] I. Nemet, D. Viki c´ -Topi c´ , L. Varga-Defterdarovi c´ , Bioorgan. Chem. 32 (2004)
5
60–570.
18] E.A. Pidko, V. Degirmenci, R.A. van Santen, E.J.M. Hensen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
9 (2010) 2530–2534.
[19] Y. Román-Leshkov, M. Moliner, J.A. Labinger, M.E. Davis, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
9 (2010) 8954–8957.
[
4
Acknowledgment
4
[
[
20] M.H. Levitt, Spin dynamics, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 2008, pp. 516–527.
21] A. Abbasi, P. Lindqvist-Reis, L. Eriksson, D. Sandström, S. Lidin, I. Persson, M.
Sandström, Chem. Eur. J. 11 (2005) 4065–4077.
We thank Prof. Takashi Tatsumi and Dr. Toshiyuki Yokoi of
Chemical Resources laboratory in Tokyo Institute of Technology for
solid state NMR measurement.
[
22] D.L. Kepert, J.M. Patrick, A.H. White, Aust. J. Chem. 36 (1983) 483–492.