6
4
M. Rahimizadeh et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 323 (2010) 59–64
agents gave over oxidation sulfone product, but Preyssler acid mod-
the reaction mixture, and its reusability demonstrates the ability of
this method.
ified nano-sized TiO is a chemoselective system for preparation of
2
sulfoxides in high yield with a trace amount of sulfone contamina-
tion.
References
The solvent effects on the ratio of the sulfoxide to sulfone are
shown in entries 10–16 (Table 3). Whereas the highest chemos-
electivity is observed in methanol, but the amount of conversion
reaches to a value of 88% in this solvent after 1 h. Performing the
reaction in i-PrOH as solvent has much higher yield with excellent
chemoselectivity.
[
[
[
1] E.N. Prilezhaeva, Russ. Chem. Rev. 70 (2001) 897–920.
2] E.N. Prilezhaeva, Russ. Chem. Rev. 69 (2000) 367–408.
3] D.H. Rich, J.P. Tam, J. Org. Chem. 42 (1977) 3815–3820.
[4] S. Burrage, T. Raynham, G. Williams, J.W. Essex, C. Allen, A. Cardno, V. Swali, M.
Bradley, Chem. Eur. J. 6 (2000) 1455–1466.
[
[
5] A. Padwa, M.D. Danca, Org. Lett. 4 (2002) 715–717.
6] I. Fernandez, N. Khiar, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 3651–3705.
Table 3 also represents the chemoselectivity of the reaction as
a function of temperature. As can be observed, the selectivity is
higher at low temperatures (entries 13, 17 and 18). By increasing
the temperature up to the reflux condition, the selectivity of the
reaction decreases to the value of 79% (entry 18).
[7] M. Madesclaire, Tetrahedron 42 (1986) 5459–5495.
[8] D.J. Procter, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 (2000) 835–872.
[
9] N.M. Gresley, W.P. Griffith, A.C. Laemmel, H.I.S. Nogueira, B.C. Parkin, J. Mol.
Catal. 117 (1997) 185–198.
[
10] F.M. Collins, A.R. Lucy, C. Sharp, J. Mol. Catal. 117 (1997) 397–403.
[11] F. Bonadies, F. De Angelis, L. Locati, A. Scettri, Tetrahedron Lett. 37 (1996)
129–7130.
7
Moreover, the comparison of this method with the other simi-
[
12] K. Kaczorowska, Z. Kolarska, K. Mitka, P. Kowalski, Tetrahedron 61 (2005)
8315–8327.
lar methods including H O oxidation of methylphenylsulfide with
2
2
a catalyst demonstrates nano-sized TiO2 catalyst has appropriate
effects on the efficiency of the oxidation (Table 4).
[13] Y. Yuan, Y. Bian, Tetrahedron Lett. 48 (2007) 8518–8520.
[
14] M. Al-Hashimi, E. Fisset, A. Sullivan, J. Wilson, Tetrahedron Lett. 47 (2006)
017–8019.
15] A. Shaabani, A. Rezayan, Catal. Commun. 8 (2007) 1112–1116.
8
The reaction was extended to other starting substrates with
different functional group after the reaction conditions for the
selective oxidation of sulfides to sulfoxides was optimized. Table 5
shows the results for the selective oxidation of various sulfides into
the corresponding sulfoxides.
[
[16] C. Izumi, Y. Urabe, M. Onaka, Zeolite, Clay and Heteropoly Acid in Organic
Reactions, Kodansha, VCH, New York, 1993.
[
[
17] Z. Zhao, Z. Li, G. Wang, W. Qiao, L. Cheng, Prog. Chem. 16 (2004) 620–623.
18] H. Mori, N. Mizuno, M. Misono, J. Catal. 131 (1990) 133–142.
[19] M. Ai, J. Catal. 71 (1981) 88–98.
[
[
20] S.S. Lim, Y.H. Kim, G.I. Park, W.Y. Lee, I.K. Song, H.K. Youn, Catal. Lett. 60 (1999)
99–204.
21] H. Kim, J.C. Jung, D.R. Park, J. Lee, K.M. Cho, S. Park, S.H. Lee, I.K. Song, Korean J.
Chem. Eng. 25 (2008) 231–235.
Both aliphatic and aromatic sulfides undergo chemoselective
oxidation reaction and the other functional groups like double
bond, nitrile, hydroxyl, carbonyl and ester groups did not oxidize
or react under the reaction conditions (entries 4, 6–10).
Due to the need to obtain catalysts for green processes, the use of
recycled catalysts is required for reducing the catalytic cost. When
the reaction was completed, the insoluble catalyst was filtered,
1
[22] H. Itoh, S. Utamapanya, J.V. Stark, K.J. Klabunde, J.R. Schlup, Chem. Mater. 5
1993) 71–77.
(
[
[
23] J. Guzman, B.C. Gates, Nano Lett. 1 (2001) 689–692.
24] B.M. Choudary, M.L. Kantam, K.V.S. Ranganath, K. Mahender, B. Sreedhar, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 3396–3397.
◦
[25] A. Fox, M.T. Dulay, Chem. Rev. 93 (1993) 341–357.
dried under vacuum (20 C), and reused. The catalyst was reused
[
26] S. Anandan, A. Vinu, N. Venkatachalam, B. Arabindoo, V. Murugesan, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 256 (2006) 312–320.
for four cycles without any significant loss of activity.
In summary, the present study represents the application of neat
[27] M.R. Hoffman, S.T. Martin, W. Choi, D.W. Bahnemann, Chem. Rev. 95 (1995)
9–96.
6
and Preyssler acid modified nano-sized TiO as catalyst for the oxi-
2
[
28] G. Rajabzadeh, A. Jalalian, Proceedings of the 14th International Sol–gel Con-
ference, Montpellier, France, 2007.
dation of sulfides to sulfones and sulfoxides, respectively, using
aqueous hydrogen peroxide. The decreasing of the TiO2 nanopar-
ticle led to larger surface area and hence an acceleration of the
reaction rate. On the other hand, modification of its surface with
Preyssler-type heteropoly acid decreased the activity and enhanced
the selectivity of the catalyst, so provided a chemoselective system
for the oxidation of sulfides to sulfoxides. Therefore, the simplic-
ity of the procedure, the mildness of the reaction conditions, high
yields and chemoselectivities, the ease of catalyst separation from
[29] B. Li, X. Wang, M. Yan, L. Li, Mater. Chem. Phys. 78 (2002) 184–188.
[30] G. Cerrato, L. Marchese, C. Morterra, Appl. Surf. Sci. 70 (1993) 200–205.
[31] A.P. Rivera, K. Tanaka, T. Hisanaga, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 3 (1993) 37–44.
[32] H. Luo, C. Wang, Y. Yan, Chem. Mater. 15 (2003) 3841–3846.
[33] B.M. Choudary, B. Bharathi, C.V. Reddy, M.L. Kantam, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.
(2002) 2069–2074.
34] K. Sato, M. Hyodo, M. Aoki, X. Zheng, R. Noyori, Tetrahedron 57 (2001)
469–2476.
1
[
2
[35] M. Matteucci, G. Bhalay, M. Bradley, Org. Lett. 5 (2003) 235–237.
[36] S. Yamazaki, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 69 (1996) 2955–2959.