Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1044
4 of 12
J = 6.2 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H), 8.58 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H), 8.09 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H), 8.04 (d,
J = 7.34 Hz, 2 H, Ar-H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.47 Hz, 2 H, Ar-H), 6.41 (d, J = 4.24 Hz, 1 H, H-1), 5.42
(t, J =4.94 Hz, 1 H, H-2), 5.32 (t, J = 5.24 Hz, 1 H, H-3), 4.68 (q, J = 3.85 Hz, 1 H, H-4), 4.55
(d, J = 3.16 Hz, 2 H, CH2NH), 4.50 and 4.36 (AB part of ABX system, 2 H, JAB = 12.8 Hz,
JAX = 4.0 Hz, JBX = 2.7 Hz, H50), 2.03 (s, 6 H, Ac), 2.00 (s, 3 H, Ac). 13C NMR (100 MHz;
MeOD) δ, ppm: 170.51 (CO), 169.97 (CO), 169.75 (CO), 155.71 (NHCONH), 146.57, 145.96,
142.14, 141.93, 139.64, 139.19, 127.86, 124.46, 117.76 (Ar-C), 97.39 (C-1), 83.05 (C-4), 76.20
(C-2), 69.09 (C-3), 62.36 (C-5), 40.57 (CH2NH), 20.63 (Me), 19.32 (Me), 18.87 (Me).
The crude vacor riboside triacetate (1 eqv, 1.8 mmol) was dissolved in 15 mL an-
hydrous methanol. After 15 min of stirring at RT, 10 mL of an NH3 solution (0.5N) in
1,4-dioxane was added and the resulting mixture was stirred at RT overnight. The reac-
tion progress was monitored by TLC. Upon completion of the reaction, the solvent was
removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by flash column silica
chromatography through gradient elution by using hexane: ethylacetate (1:1), ethylacetate:
MeOH (1:1) and water: MeOH (1:1) as eluents. Yield 62%, 1H NMR (400 MHz; D2O)
δ, ppm:
9.00 (s, 1 H, Ar-H), 8.91 (d, J = 6.12 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H), 8.45 (d, J = 7.92 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H), 8.34 (s,
1 H, Ar-H), 8.04–7.99 (m, 2 H, Ar-H), 7.33 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H), 6.06 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 1 H,
H-1), 4.55 (s, 2 H, CH2NH), 4.38–4.35 (m, 1 H, H-3), 4.22 (t, J = 4.52 Hz, 1 H, H-2), 3.88–3.76
(AB part of ABX system, 2 H, JAB = 12.9 Hz, JAX = 2.92 Hz, JBX = 3.8 Hz, H50). 13C NMR
(100 MHz; D2O) δ, ppm: 170.83 (Ar-C), 156.62 (CO), 145.81, 145.29, 141.84, 141.22, 139.08,
138.42, 127.92, 125.17, 118.25 (Ar-C), 99.52 (C-1), 87.59 (C-4), 77.50 (C-2), 69.98 (C-3), 60.53
(C-5), 40.59 (CH2NH); HRMS calcd for C18H21N4O7[M + H]+ 405.14102 found 405.14214.
2.3. Cultivation, Vacor/VR Treatment and Nucleotide Extraction of 293 Cells
293 cells were cultivated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco) supple-
mented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM glutamine and penicillin (100 U/mL)/
◦
streptomycin (100
µ
g/mL) (normal medium). The cells were cultured at 37 C in a humidi-
fied atmosphere of 5% CO2. Prior to vacor/VR treatment, the cells were seeded in 12-well
plates (200,000 cells/well) in 1 mL normal medium. The day after seeding, the cells were
washed once with PBS and the medium was changed to the normal medium supplemented
with 100
µM vacor, 100 µM VR or no supplement (control). The cells were then incubated
for 24 h before extraction.
For nucleotide extraction, the cells were placed on ice, the growth medium was
removed, and the cells were washed twice with 0.5 mL ice-cold PBS. Then, 0.5 mL ice-cold
80% (v/v) LC-MS-grade methanol was added to each well and the cells were incubated at
◦
4 C on a shaker for 20 min. After incubation, the cells were detached from the wells using
a cell scraper and the samples were transferred to 1.5 mL tubes. To ensure full transfer,
the wells were washed with 0.3 mL of ice-cold 80% (v/v) LC-MS-grade methanol. The
samples were subsequently frozen at
−
80 ◦C. On the day of LC-MS analysis, the samples
were thawed on a rotating wheel at 4 ◦C before centrifugation at 16,000
×
g for 20 min at
4 ◦C. After centrifugation, 0.6 mL of the supernatant was transferred to a new tube and
0.6 mL acetonitrile was added to each sample.
2.4. LC-MS Analysis
Separation of the nucleotides by liquid chromatography was done using a SeQuant
ZIC-cHILC column (100
×
2.1 mm, 3 µm; Merck) in a Dionex UltiMate 3000 liquid chro-
matographer coupled to a QExactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Oslo, NO,
USA). The column compartment was kept at 30 ◦C during the run. The injection volume
for all samples was 10 µL and the flow rate was kept at 0.3 mL/min.
The mobile phase consisted of 20 mM ammonium acetate, pH 6.8 (Buffer A), and
acetonitrile (Buffer B). The gradient was set as follows: Runs were started with 80% Buffer
B for 1 min (flowthrough). The concentration of Buffer B was further decreased to 70%
over 11 min for separation before being brought to 5% over 1 min for washout. After
3.5 min at 5% Buffer B, the concentration of Buffer B was returned to 80% over 1 min