10.1002/cctc.201901052
ChemCatChem
FULL PAPER
[9]
K. Hadjiivanov, M. Mihaylov, D. Klissurski, P. Stefanov, N. Abadjieva,
E. Vassileva, L. Mintchev, J. Catal., 1999, 185, 314-323.
H. Li, Y. Zhao, C. Gao, Y. Wang, Z. Sun, X. Liang, Chem. Eng. J.
2012, 181-182, 501-507.
X. Chen, M. Zhang, K. Yang, C. T. Williams, C. Liang, Catal. Lett.,
2014, 144, 1118-1126.
J. M. Campelo, R. Guardeno, D. Luna, J. M. Marinas, J. Morales, J.
L. Tirado, J. Mol. Catal., 1993, 85, 305-325.
D. Chen, Z. Guo, T. Sun, F. Du, Mate. Res. Bull., 2012, 47, 2344-
programmed desorption of NH3 (NH3-TPD) experiments were conducted
on the AutoChem II 2920 instrument equipped with a TCD. The catalysts
(100 mg) were in situ reduced in H2 at 500 °C for 1 h and then purged with
pure Ar at 500 °C for 1 h. After that, they were exposed to NH3 for 1 h at
50 °C to reach saturated adsorption. Subsequently, the catalysts were
heated to 700 °C with a ramp rate of 10 °C /min and the desorption signal
was collected by TCD.
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
2348.
[14]
[15]
Z. Li, S. Kawi, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2018, 8, 1915-1922.
Y. Liu, J. Zhao, J. Feng, Y. He, Y. Du, D. Li, J. Catal., 2018, 359, 251-
260.
Catalytic performance
The catalyst activity tests for BYD hydrogenation were performed in a
100 mL stainless steel autoclave inbuilt with a pressure gauge setup. In a
typical experiment, 10 wt% BYD, 0.2 g catalyst and 40 mL methanol
containing 1, 2-propylene glycol as the internal standard were charged into
a high-pressure reactor. After sealed, the reaction system was first flushed
with N2 and H2 for 5 times, and then pressurized with pure H2 to the desired
pressure. The reaction temperature and pressure were set at 50 °C and 1
MPa with a stirring rate of 800 r/min for 3 h. After reaction, the reaction
mixture was separated by filtration to analyze the product contents by an
Agilent 7890A GC with a HP-INNOWAX column. The BYD conversion and
products selectivity/yields were calculated in the following methods, and
their carbon balance were maintained above 95%.
[16]
X. Wang, S. Zhu, S. Wang, J. Wang, W. Fan, Y. Lv, Appl. Catal. A,
2018, 568, 231-241.
X. Z. Sun, F.-L. Du, Chemistryselect, 2016, 1, 6972-6978.
J. Wood, L. Bodenes, J. Bennett, K. Deplanche, L. E. Macaskie, Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res., 2010, 49, 980-988.
J. A. Bennett, G. A. Attard, K. Deplanche, M. Casadesus, S. E.
Huxter, L. E. Macaskie, J. Wood, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 504-511.
C. Berguerand, I. Yuranov, F. Cardenas-Lizana, T. Yuranova, L.
Kiwi-Minsker, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 12250-12259..
M. G. Musolino, C. M. S. Cutrupi, A. Donato, D. Pietropaolo, R.
Pietropaolo, Appl. Catal. A, 2003, 243, 333-346.
J. Ashok, Y. Kathiraser, M. L. Ang, S. Kawi, Catal. Sci. Technol.,
2015, 5, 4398-4409.
A. Egeberg, C. Dietrich, C. Kind, R. Popescu, D. Gerthsen, S.
Behrens, C. Feldmann, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 3534-3543.
F. Zhang, Z. Li, C. Ma, X. Han, X. Dong, Z. Dong, X.-M. Zhang,
ChemCatChem, 2019.
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
(
)
(
)
moles of BYD initial – moles of BYD final
BYD conversion =
× 100%
T. Sasaki, N. Ichikuni, T. Hara, S. Shimazu, Catal. Today, 2018, 307,
29-34.
M. Yang, P. Jin, Y. Fan, C. Huang, N. Zhang, W. Weng, M. Chen, H.
Wan, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 5095-5099.
X. Kong, Y. Zhu, H. Zheng, X. Li, Y. Zhu, Y.-W. Li, ACS Catal., 2015,
5, 5914-5920.
(
)
moles of BYD initial
moles of products
Products selectivity =
× 100%
(
)
(
)
moles of BYD initial – moles of BYD final
Products yield = BYD conversion × products selectivity × 100%
The product generation kinetics of BYD hydrogenation versus long-
term reaction was investigated under the similar reaction condition, while
keeping the H2 pressure constant at 1 MPa. For the recycling experiment,
the same catalyst was repeatedly used for 4 times under the reaction
condition of 50 °C and 1 MPa for 3 h.
M. M. Telkar, C. V. Rode, R. Jaganathan, V. H. Rane, R. V.
Chaudhari, J. Mol. Catal., 2002, 187, 81-93.
M. G. Musolino, C. M. S. Cutrupi, A. Donato, D. Pietropaolo, R.
Pietropaolo, J. Mol. Catal., 2003, 195, 147-157.
C. V. Rode, P. R. Tayade, J. M. Nadgeri, R. Jaganathan, R. V.
Chaudhari, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2006, 10, 278-284.
H. Yue, Y. Zhao, S. Zhao, B. Wang, X. Ma, J. Gong, Nat. commun.,
2013, 4, 2339.
S. Pendem, I. Mondal, A. Shrotri, B. S. Rao, N. Lingaiah, J. Mondal,
Sustain. Energ. Fuels, 2018, 2, 1516-1529.
X. Huang, C. Ji, C. Wang, F. Xiao, N. Zhao, N. Sun, W. Wei, Y. Sun,
Catal. Today, 2017, 281, Part 2, 241-249.
Acknowledgements
C. Wang, N. Sun, N. Zhao, W. Wei, Y. Zhao, Catal. Today, 2017, 281,
268-275.
We are grateful for financial support from the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (21603127, 21673132, U1710221),
the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province
(201601D202020). Also thanks are due to Shanxi University
Future Development Foundation for the supporting Dr Tiancun
Xiao.
C. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhao, Chinese J Che., 2017, 35,
113-120.
W. Gao, Y. F. Zhao, H. R. Chen, H. Chen, Y. W. Li, S. He, Y. K. Zhang,
M. Wei, D. G. Evans, X. Duan, Green Chem., 2015, 17, 1525-1534.
Y. Zhao, B. Zhao, J. Liu, G. Chen, R. Gao, S. Yao, M. Li, Q. Zhang,
L. Gu, J. Xie, X. Wen, L.-Z. Wu, C.-H. Tung, D. Ma, T. Zhang,
Angew.Chemie, 2016, 55, 4215-4219.
M. L. Ang, J. T. Miller, Y. Cui, L. Mo, S. Kawi, Catal. Sci. Technol.,
2016, 6, 3394-3409.
P. Maki-Arvela, J. Hajek, T. Salmi, D. Y. Murzin, Appl. Catal. A., 2005,
292, 1-49.
C. I. Meyer, A. J. Marchi, A. Monzon, T. F. Garetto, Appl. Catal. A.,
2009, 367, 122-129.
Y. Chen, C. Li, J. Zhou, S. Zhang, D. Rao, S. He, M. Wei, D. G.
Evans, X. Duan, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 5756-5765.
J. Ashok, Z. Bian, Z. Wang, S. Kawi, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2018, 8,
1730-1742.
X. Li, M. Xiang, D. Wu, Catal. Commun., 2019, 119, 170-175.
M. G. Musolino, G. Apa, A. Donato, R. Pietropaolo, F. Frusteri, Appl.
Catal. A, 2007, 325, 112-120.
K. N. T. Tseng, J. W. Kampf, N. K. Szymczak, J. ACS, 2016, 138,
10378-10381.
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
Keywords: bimetallic synergy • NiCu phyllosilicate • three-
center-synergy • 1,4-butynediol hydrogenation• anti-
isomerization
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
S. K. Tanielyan, S. R. More, R. L. Augustine, S. R. Schmidt, Org.
Process Res. Dev., 2017, 21, 327-335.
I.-T. Trotuş, T. Zimmermann, F. Schüth, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114,
1761-1782.
M. M. Telkar, C. V. Rode, V. H. Rane, R. Jaganathan, R. V.
Chaudhari, Appl. Catal. A., 2001, 216, 13-22.
C. Li, M. Zhang, X. Di, D. Yin, W. Li, C. Liang, Chin. J. Catal., 2016,
37, 1555-1561.
D. Francova, N. Tanchoux, C. Gerardin, P. Trens, F. Prinetto, G.
Ghiotti, D. Tichit, B. Coq, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 2007, 99, 118-
125.
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
X. Kong, Y. Zhu, H. Zheng, Y. Zhu, Z. Fang, ACS Sustain. Chem.
Eng.,2017, 5, 11280-11289.
Z. Huang, K. J. Barnett, J. P. Chada, Z. J. Brentzel, Z. Xu, J. A.
Dumesic, G. W. Huber, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 8429-8440.
B. Guan, X. Wang, Y. Xiao, Y. Liu, Q. Huo, Nanoscale 2013, 5, 2469-
2475.
[6]
M. Telkar, C. Rode, V. Rane, R. Chaudhari, Catal. Commun., 2005,
6, 725-730.
[7]
[8]
F. Zhao, Y. Ikushima, M. Arai, Catal. Today, 2004, 93-95, 439-443.
S. Tanielyan, S. Schmidt, N. Marin, G. Alvez, R. Augustine, Top.
Catal., 2010, 53, 1145-1149.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.