catalytic etherification methods have been reported on the
basis of the substitution reactions.7 Dehydration of alcohols
with metal catalysts is a direct approach for the synthesis of
ethers, and such protocols have been recently studied.8
Transition-metal-catalyzed allylic and propargylic etherifi-
cation reactions are also attractive.9 However, there are still
limitations on substrates and drawbacks such as the require-
ment of elevated temperature and long reaction time in the
known procedures. In contrast, neither severe reaction
conditions nor highly reactive electrophiles are necessary in
the current catalytic system.
Scheme 3
excess was 37%, which suggests that the reaction between
1g and 2i involves SN1 mechanism having some SN2
character.
On the basis of these results, a plausible mechanism is
illustrated in Scheme 4. The coordination of the triple bond
The current etherification was applied to the synthesis of
cyclic ether compounds. Treatment of 7a with the gold
catalyst resulted in the formation of the corresponding six-
membered cyclic ether product 8a in 86% yield. On the other
hand, no reaction occurred with 7b, which has no alkynyl
group at the ortho-position. The reactions of 7c and 7d also
gave the corresponding products 8b and 8c in 90 and 100%
yields, respectively (Scheme 2).
Scheme 4
Scheme 2
of 1 to the gold catalyst enhances the electrophilicity of
alkyne, and the subsequent nucleophilic attack of the
carbonyl oxygen to the electron-deficient alkyne would form
the zwitterionic intermediate 10.11,12 Due to the enhanced
leaving ability of the isocoumarin moiety, the nucleophilic
attack of alcohol 2 to 10 would occur to give ether compound
3 together with isocoumarin 5.
We next turned our attention to the Friedel-Crafts
alkylation.13 Generally, alkylation of π-rich heteroaromatics,
such as furan, is difficult under the traditional Friedel-Crafts
conditions because of catalyst-promoted polymerization and
polyalkylation.14 Recently, some effective catalysts, such as
lanthanide triflates15 and transition metal catalysts,16 have
From a mechanistic point of view, we investigated the
reaction of (S)-1g (99% ee) with MeOH 2i (Scheme 3). The
reaction proceeded smoothly at rt for 1 h in CH2Cl2, and the
corresponding ether 3k was obtained in 78% yield. The
absolute configuration of 3k was determined to be R by
comparison of the observed optical rotation to a literature
value for (R)-(1-methoxyethyl)benzene.10 The enantiomeric
(6) PtCl2-catalyzed cyclization of benzoic acid ester through car-
boalkoxylation of the alkyne has been reported; see: Fu¨rstner, A.; Davies,
P. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15024. For recent other examples of
metal-catalyzed intramolecular carboalkoxylation of alkynes, see: (a)
Nakamura, I.; Mizushima, Y.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
15022. (b) Dube´, P.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12062.
(7) For examples of catalytic etherifications, see: (a) Kashman, Y. J.
Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 912. (b) Doyle, M. P.; DeBruyn, D. J.; Kooistra, D.
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 3659. (c) Tsunoda, T.; Suzuki, M.; Noyori,
R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20, 4679. (d) Iversen, T.; Bundle, D. R. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1981, 1240. (e) Kato, J.; Iwasawa, N.; Mukaiyama,
T. Chem. Lett. 1985, 743. (f) Olah, G. A.; Yamato, T.; Iyer, P. S.; Prakash,
G. K. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2826. (g) Olah, G. A.; Shamma, T.; Prakash,
G. K. S. Catal. Lett. 1997, 46, 1. (h) Gray, W. K.; Smail, F. R.; Hitzler, M.
G.; Ross, S. K.; Poliakoff, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10711. (i)
Mahrwald, R.; Quint, S.; Scholtis, S. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 9847. (j) Rai,
A. N.; Basu, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2267. (k) Aoki, H.; Mukaiyama,
T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2006, 79, 1255. (l) Kuethe, J. T.; Marcoux, J.-F.;
Wong, A.; Wu, J.; Hillier, M. C.; Dormer, P. G.; Davies, I. W.; Hughes,
D. L. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7378.
(8) For examples of metal-catalyzed dehydration of alcohols, see: (a)
Nishibayashi, Y.; Wakiji, I.; Hidai, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11019.
(b) Sherry, B. D.; Radosevich, A. T.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 6076. (c) Miller, K. J.; Abu-Omar, M. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
1294. (d) Shibata, T.; Fujiwara, R.; Ueno, Y. Synlett 2005, 152. (e) Bustelo,
E.; Dixneuf, P. H. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 933. (f) Corma, A.; Renz,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 298.
(9) For reviews, see: (a) Trost, B. M.; Crawley, M. L. Chem. ReV. 2003,
103, 2921. (b) Trost, B. M. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5813. (c) Miyabe, H.;
Takemoto, Y. Synlett 2005, 1641.
(10) Yoshida, M.; Weiss, R. G. Tetrahedron 1975, 31, 1801.
(11) Zhu, J.; Germain, A. R.; Porco, J. A., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 1239.
(12) Kusama, H.; Iwasawa, N. Chem. Lett. 2006, 35, 1082.
(13) (a) Olah, G. A. Friedel-Crafts and Related Reactions; Wiley: New
York, 1963. (b) Bandini, M.; Melloni, A.; Umani-Ronchi, A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 550.
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 21, 2007
4301