potency comparable to parent compound 8. Although the phenols
23 and 33-34 all showed significantly decreased or even
abolished activity, the m-OH compound 35 showed activity
comparable to compound 8. Similarly, the m-NH2 compound 36
also showed good activity although its p-NH2 analog 24 gave
poor activity. Introduction of single methoxy group (37-38) gave
inhibitory activity comparable to compound 8, while multiple
methoxy or alkoxy groups gave moderately reduced activity (39-
44). Introduction of an electron withdrawing group and an
electron donating group simultaneously (45) gave good
inhibitory potency against SKOV3 cells (IC50 = 1.7 µM),
however it also exhibited strong toxicity to human normal MCF-
10A cells (IC50 = 3.6 µM). However, its amino analog 47 retained
the high anticancer activity while showed low toxicity on human
normal WI-38 cells.
47
1.7
24.3
27.9
17.6
>100
a IC50 indicates compound concentration required to inhibit cell viability by
50%. Values are expressed as the mean of triplicates experiments.
In summary, we reported the anticancer activity of a series of
chalcone-benzoxaborole hybrid compounds. We have shown that
the terminal phenyl group can tolerate bulky aromatic rings, and
it is sensitive to the substitution pattern and the electronic
properties of the substituents. Iodo- and amino-groups are
beneficial for selectivity between cancerous and normal cells.
Compound 15 showed both high potency on cancer cells and
high toxicity on normal cells. Compounds 18 and 47 showed
high potency on cancer cells with low toxicity on normal cells.
This structure-activity relationship provided a basis for further
optimization. To date, despite of their application in antifungal,
antibacterial, antiviral, and antiparasitic research, benzoxaboroles
have not been reported for any significant anticancer activity.
This work showed that bezoxaboroles may serve as a potentially
useful class of anticancer agents. However, their mechanism of
action remains to be elucidated. In previous reports, their
biological activities were mainly assessed by phenotypic
screening while the cellular targets remained unknown. Much
effort has been made to reveal their cellular targets, such as the
successful identification of an antifungal target leucyl-tRNA
synthetases (LeuRS).12 Although LeuRS was also suggested as an
anticancer target24 our chalcone-benzoxaboroles did not show
any significant inhibition of it. In addition, it has been reported
that specific benzoxaboroles inhibited β-lactamases15 and HCV
NS3 protease.18 But these targets are not involved in anticancer
activity. We are currently making efforts to investigate the
cellular targets of these molecules in cancer cells and will report
our progress in due time.
Table 3. The effect of different phenyl substitutions.
a IC50 (µM)
Compound
R
MDA-
MB231
SKOV3
3.7
HCT116 MCF-10A WI-38
28
2.2
4.2
25.4
23.6
29
30
4.8
1.8
3.0
3.4
6.7
3.2
15.8
14.9
26.7
12.5
31
32
2.9
1.9
4.5
5.3
6.7
6.1
15.9
4.7
16.7
22.0
33
48.8
16.9
67.6
77.9
53.7
>100
>100
Acknowledgements
34
35
36
>100
>100
>100
We thank National Science Foundation of China (81222042;
81573264; 21402118) for financial support of this work.
3.8
7.4
2.7
3.2
6.5
4.5
25.3
19.6
26.4
25.3
References and notes
1. Cancer;
World
Health
Organization:
Geneva;
37
38
39
2.6
2.6
6.1
3.1
2.1
5.0
5.0
9.1
7.4
21.7
14.6
86.3
2. Chen, W.; Zheng, R.; Baade, P. D.; Zhang, S.; Zeng, H.; Bray, F.;
Jemal, A.; Yu, X. Q.; He, J. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016, 66, 115.
3. Siegel, R. L.; Miller, K. D.; Jemal, A. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015,
65, 5.
4. Holohan, C.; Van Schaeybroeck, S.; Longley, D. B.; Johnston, P.
G. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 714.
11.2
16.2
12.2
5. Kuczynski, E. A.; Sargent, D. J.; Grothey, A.; Kerbel, R. S. Nat.
Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 10, 571.
6. Smoum, R.; Rubinstein, A.; Dembitsky, V. M.; Srebnik, M. Chem.
Rev. 2012, 112, 4156.
40
41
4.8
5.7
13.2
10.6
12.2
7.9
13.5
48.5
33.5
18.5
7. Das,
B.
C.; Thapa,
P.; Karki,
R.; Schinke,
C.; Das,
S.; Kambhampati, S.; Banerjee, S. K.; Van Veldhuizen, P.; Verma,
A.; Weiss, L. M.; Evans, T. Future Med. Chem. 2013, 5, 653.
8. Adams, J.; Kauffman, M. Cancer Invest. 2004, 22, 304.
9. Bross, P. F.; Kane, R.; Farrell, A. T.; Abraham, S.; Benson,
K.; Brower, M. E.; Bradley, S.; Gobburu, J. V.; Goheer, A.; Lee,
S. L.; Leighton, J.; Liang, C. Y.; Lostritto, R. T.; McGuinn, W. D.;
Morse, D. E.; Rahman, A.; Rosario, L. A.; Verbois, S.
L.; Williams, G.; Wang, Y. C.; Pazdur, R. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004,
10, 3954.
42
6.5
10.2
10.2
11.7
27.0
43
44
11.7
7.3
4.5
7.9
13.3
10.3
48.1
11.7
33.2
30.2
10. Torssell, K. Ark. Kemi. 1957, 10, 507.
11. Baker, S. J.; Zhang, Y. K.; Akama, T.; Lau, A.; Zhou, H. C.;
Hernandez, V.; Mao, W. M.; Alley, M. R. K.; Sanders, V.;
Plattner, J. J. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 4447.
45
1.7
11.4
4.1
3.6
26.0