Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
3) was notably slower than that of 2,5-dichloropyridine (entry
2). 3-Chloropyridine is an exception (entry 4), as it was inert
under our conditions. Reaction of 2-fluoro-3-chloro-5-tri-
fluoromethylpyridine (entry 5) returned two products. The
major product was the expected 3-carboxypyridine com-
pound. The minor product, surprisingly, was the 2,3-dicar-
boxypyridine compound. The minor product is not formed
from the major, as resubjecting the major product to the
carbonylation conditions did not generate the minor product.
It is likely that a chloride ion in the reaction solution dis-
placed the fluoride at the 2-position of the pyridine ring,
followed by carbonylation at that position.
Carbonylation of bromoaniline substrates is difficult and
is usually accomplished by amine protection to modulate the
electron density of the aniline ring.7 Employing the mild
(BINAP)PdCl2 conditions, both o-bromoaniline and m-bro-
moaniline were smoothly transformed to the corresponding
esters in excellent yields overnight (Table 3). The conversion
aryl group and subsequent generation of the acyl palladium
complex. The acyl complex then reacts with a nucleophile
such as an alcohol or amine to give ester or amide products.9
Although the mechanism involving a palladium catalyst
containing a rigid bisphosphine bidentate ligand could occur
similarly, it would be less entropically favored for one of
the phosphines to dissociate completely.10 This suggests that
the carbonylation involving the bisphosphine ligands may
proceed via an alternate mechanism. A few possible path-
ways are outlined below and summarized in Scheme 2.
Scheme 2
Table 3. Carbonylation of Bromoanilines and Bromoanisoles
As in the standard mechanism, the process is initiated with
reduction of I to produce a reactive Pd(0) complex II, which
oxidatively adds to the Ar-X bond to generate complex III
(Scheme 2). At this point, CO may interact with III either
axially or equatorially. The axial approach to III leads to a
five-coordinate complex IV, reminiscent of the interaction
between CO and Vaska’s complex.11 The ∼90° ligand bite
angle is optimized for the square pyramidal geometry of IV.
Aryl migration to CO restores the square planar geometry
as the acyl complex.
The equatorial approach requires some reorganization of
ligands around the metal center, resulting in complexes of
the general type V, VI, and VII.
of p-bromoaniline was more sluggish and only 50% complete
at 48 h. Bromoanisoles were also cleanly carbonylated to
produce methoxybenzoic esters in excellent yields. o-Bro-
moanisole and p-bromoanisole both performed equally well
under these mild conditions.
The mechanism of palladium-catalyzed carbonylation reac-
tions employing monodentate ligands has been investigated
by several groups.8 The mechanism often invoked requires
a dissociation of one of the phosphine ligands to provide
the coordinatively unsaturated metal complex followed by
ligation to carbon monoxide, followed by migration of the
(8) (a) Schoenberg, A.; Bartoletti, I.; Heck, R. F. J. Org. Chem. 1974,
39, 3318-3326. (b) Stille, J. K.; Wong, P. K. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40,
532-534. (c) Garrou, P. E.; Heck, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 4115-
4127. (d) Moser, W. R.; Wang, A. W.; Kjeldahl, N. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1988, 110, 2816-2820.
(9) (a) Milstein, D. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 428-434. (b) Ozawa, F.;
Kawasaki, N.; Okamoto, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, A. Organometallics
1987, 6, 1640-1651. (c) Lin, Y.-S.; Yamamoto, A. Organometallics 1998,
17, 3466-3478. (d) van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M.; Zuideveld, M. A.;
Swennenhuis, B. H. G.; Freixa, Z.; Kamer, P. C. J.; Goubitz, K.; Fraanje,
J.; Lutz, M.; Spek, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5523-5539.
(10) (a) One example of monodentate coordination of BINAP has been
reported for an osmium cluster: Prestopino, F.; Persson, R.; Monari, M.;
Focci, N.; Nordlander, E. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 1998, 302-304. (b) For
an example of carbonylation of neutral palladium complexes containing
hemi-labile bidentate ligands, see: Frankcombe, K.; Cavell, K.; Knott, R.;
Yates, B. Chem. Commun. 1996, 781-782.
(7) Mahmud, H.; Lovely, C. J.; Dias, H. V. R. Tetrahedron 2001, 57,
4095-4105. (b) Lovely, C. J.; Mahmud, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
2079-2082. (c) Torisawa, Y.; Nishi, T.; Minamikawa, J.-I. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 2493-2495. (d) Lapidus, A. L.; Petrovskii, K. B.;
Bruk, L. G.; Beletskaya, I. P. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 35, 1636-1639.
(e) Yun, W.; Li, S.; Wang, B.; Chen, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 175-
177. (f) Cai, M.-Z.; Song, C.-S.; Huang, X. Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 361-
366. (g) Devi, R.; Pardhasaradhi, M.; Iyengar, D. S. Tetrahedron 1994, 50,
2543-2550. (h) Davies, S. G.; Goodwin, C. J.; Pyatt, D.; Smith, A. D. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 1413-1420.
(11) (a) Vaska, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 4100-4101. (b) Abu-
Hasanayn, F.; Krogh-Jerspersen, K.; Goldman, A. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 5979-5980. (c) Aullon, G.; Alvarez, S. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35,
3137-3144. (d) Kanzelberger, M.; Zhang, X.; Emge, T. J.; Goldman, A.
S.; Zhao, J.; Incarvito, C.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
13644-13645.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 13, 2004
2099