1326 Xu et al.
Asian J. Chem.
300
250
200
150
100
50
All the above results indicate that BNFPF6P completely
converts into BAFPF6P. The peaks at 1502 cm-1 is a charac-
teristic absorption peak of the benzene ring. The C-F multiple
stretch bending absorptions from -CF3 are observed between
1300 and 1100 cm-1.
The 1H and 19F NMR of BAFPF6P are shown in Figs. 2 and
3, respectively. The structure of BAFPF6P molecule is symme-
trical and all the hydrogen can be divided into six types for
different chemical environments. The ratio of the integral height
of H1:H2:H3:H4:H5:H6 is 4:4:2:2:2:4, which is identical with
the number of hydrogen atoms of BAFPF6P. In Fig. 3, two
peaks are found at -60.28 and -63.44 ppm, indicating that the
fluorine atoms are in two different chemical environments.
The ratio of the integral height Fa and Fb is equal to 1, which
is in accordance with that of the designed product.
PUE
FPUE1
FPUE2
FPUE3
0
-50
200
300
400
Temperature (°C)
500
600
Thermal property of FPUEs: T10, T50 and Tmax are the
temperature of 10 %, 50 % and max weight loss of the sample,
respectively. The T10 and T50 of FPUE2 are higher than those
of polyurethane elastomer, meanwhile the char yield of FPUE2
(19.6 %) is higher than that of PUE (14.9 %). It can be concluded
that FPUE2 has a better thermal stability than PUE (Table-2).
Fig. 4. MCC curves of FPUEs
TABLE-3
SURFACE PROPERTIES OF FPUES AND PU
Contact angle (º)
Surface tension (× 10-3 N/m)
Sample
γd
γp
γ
Water Ethylene glycol
PUE
66.2
89.7
51.1
70
10.07
15.45
17.64
17.12
25.71
6.52
2.47
1.06
35.77
21.97
20.11
18.18
TABLE-2
TGA DATA OF FPUES AND PUE
FPUE1
FPUE2
FPUE3
98.8
77
T10
(ºC)
T50
(ºC)
Tmax1
(ºC)
Tmax2
(ºC)
Char yield
(%)
105.5
83.5
Sample
PUE
329
350.6
349
429.2
431.6
430.2
430.2
308.4
307.4
303
439.7
438.4
433
14.9
17.3
19.6
21.2
Conclusion
FPUE1
FPUE2
FPUE3
2,2-Bis[4-(4-amino-2-trifluoromethylphenoxy)phenyl]-
hexafluoropropane (BAFPF6P) was synthesized from 2-chloro-
benzotrifluoride and 2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)hexafluoro-
propane and it was utilized as a chain extender to prepare a
series of FPUEs. Through the FTIR and NMR analysis, the
results demonstrate the structure of synthetic product is in
accord with that of the expected design. The influence of
fluorine on thermal stability, flammability and surface properties
of the FPUE were investigated. The results show that the
introduction of fluorinated chain extender can improve the
surface properties efficiently. The surface tension of FPUE3
is almost reduced by 50 % compared with that of PUE. The
results from TGA show that the introduction of fluorinated
chain extender to the PUE improves the thermal stabilities;
the THR and PHRR of FPUE2 are 15 KJ/g and 179.5 W/g,
respectively, which indicates that the fluorinated chain extender
incorporated contributes to improved flame-retardant prop-
erties. These properties should make these FPUEs attractive
for practical applications.
333.4
298.6
433
Flame retardant property of FPUEs: The THR and
PHRR of FPUE2 are 15 KJ/g and 179.5 W/g, respectively.
They are both lower than those of PUE which are 17.1 KJ/g
and 275.6 W/g. FPUE2 and PUE have the same soft segment,
R and Chain extension coefficient, with the only difference in
the types of chain extender. It means that FPUE2 based on
BAFPF6P shows better flame retardation than PUE based on
MOCA; in other words, the introduction of fluorinated chain
extender improves the flame retardation.
From FPUE1 to FPUE3, the THR and PHRR decrease
from 15.3 KJ/g and 244.4 W/g to 11 KJ/g and 119.1 W/g,
respectively. The main reason for this is that, from FPUE1 to
FPUE3, they all contain the same soft segment and chain
extender, but the R increases from 1.8-2.4, so the increase in
the fluorinated chain extender content gradually results in an
increase in flame retardation (Fig. 4).
Surface property of FPUEs: The contact angle of PUE
with water and ethylene glycol are 66.2 and 51.1º and the
surface tension is 35.77 mN/m, while the surface tension of
FPUE1, FPUE2 and FPUE3 is obviously lower. The surface
tension of FPUE3 is just 18.18 mN/m, almost reduced 50 %
compared with PUE. It shows that the introduction of fluorine
to the polyurethane elastomer reduces the surface tension. The
main reasons for this is that the CF3 bears relatively low surface
energy, so it is easy to migrate to and enrich on the surface,
which results in the higher concentration of CF3 groups on the
surface than in bulk and then the FPUEs show excellent low
surface energy (Table-3).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the National Natural Science Founda-
tion of China (No. 21004001/B040601) and the National Key
Technology R&D Program (No. 2013BAJ01B05) for their
financial support.
REFERENCES
1. T. Liu and L. Ye, J. Fluor. Chem., 131, 36 (2010).
2. K. Chen and J. Kuo, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 201, 2676 (2000).
3. W.L. Wu, G.C.Yuan,A.H. He and C.C. Han, Langmuir, 25, 3178 (2009).
4. L.F. Wang, Eur. Polym. J., 41, 293 (2005).