M. Sheykhan et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1027 (2012) 156–161
161
and hysteresis loop was not observed, confirmed that catalyst is a
References
superparamagnetic material.
[1] S.A. Aziz, C.O. Knowles, Nature 242 (1973) 417–418.
[2] R.W. Beeman, F. Matsumura, Nature 242 (1973) 273–274.
[3] A.I. Meyers, T.R. Elworthy, J. Org. Chem. 57 (1992) 4732–4740.
[4] S. Patai, The Chemistry of Amidine and Imidates, Wiley, London, 1975. p. 258.
[5] F.A. Cotton, L.M. Daniels, C.A. Murillo, X. Wang, Inorg. Chem. 36 (1997) 869.
[6] F.A. Cotton, L.M. Daniels, D.J. Maloney, C.A. Murillo, J.H. Matonic, Polyhedron
13 (1994) 815.
[7] D.I. Arnold, F.A. Cotton, D.J. Maloney, C.A. Murillo, J.H. Matonic, Polyhedron 16
(1997) 133.
[8] J. Baker, M. Kilner, Coord. Chem. Rev. 133 (1994) 219.
[9] F.A. Cotton, R.A. Walton, Multiple Bonds Between Metal Atoms, second ed.,
Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1993.
Four aforementioned catalysts and also 40 mg naked Fe3O4 (for
comparison) as catalyst were examined in a model reaction. The
activity of the catalysts was also investigated from time and yield
point of view. The model reaction was carried out by the following
protocol: 1.2 mmol triethyl orthoformate was activated by
0.05 mmol catalysts and then 2 mmol aniline was added at room
temperature. After investigation, we found that
c-Fe2O3@SiO2–
HBF4 is more efficient catalyst for the synthesis of formamidine
derivatives (Table 1). The catalyst was extended to diamines and
mixtures of amines resulted in the formation of desired products
(Table 2). In addition, the recyclability of catalyst was considered
in 5 consecutive runs without significant loss of activity.
[10] F.A. Cotton, L.M. Daniels, D.J. Maloney, C.A. Murillo, Inorg. Chim. Acta 242
(1996) 31.
[11] C.-H. Lin, C.-H. Tsai, H.-C. Chang, Catalysis Lett. 104 (2005) 135–140.
[12] D.A. Horton, G.T. Bourne, M.L. Sinythe, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 893–930.
[13] M. Alamgir, S.C.D. Black, N. Kumar, Top. Heterocycl. Chem. 9 (2007) 87–118.
[14] A.R. Porcari, R.V. Devivar, L.S. Kucera, J.C. Drach, L.B. Townsend, J. Med. Chem.
41 (1998) 1252–1262.
[15] T. Rath, M.L. Morningstar, P.L. Boyer, S.M. Hughes, R.W. Buckheitjr, C.J.
Michejda, J. Med. Chem. 40 (1997) 4199–4207.
[16] M.T. Migawa, J.L. Girardet, J.A. Walker, G.W. Koszalka, S.D. Chamberlain, J.C.
Drach, L.B. Townsend, J. Med. Chem. 41 (1998) 1242–1251.
[17] I. Tamm, Science 126 (1957) 1235–1236.
[18] J. Mann, A. Baron, Y. Opoku-Boahen, E. Johansson, G. Parkinson, L.R. Kelland, S.
Neidle, J. Med. Chem. 44 (2001) 138–144.
[19] A. Figge, H.J. Altenbach, D.J. Brauer, P. Tielmann, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 13
(2002) 137–144.
[20] E.C. Taylor, W.A. Ehrhart, J. Org. Chem. 27 (1962) 1108–1112.
[21] K. Kaji, H. Matsubara, H. Nagashima, Y. Kikugawa, S.I. Yamada, Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 26 (1978) 2246–2249.
[22] A.S. Ripak, D.D. Diaz, K.P. Sharpless, M.G. Finn, Org. Lett. 6 (2004) 43–46.
[23] F. Poch, Tetrahedron 42 (1986) 4461–4469.
4. Conclusion
In summary the synthesis, spectroscopic characterization
and catalytic application of four Brønsted acids supported on
c
-Fe2O3@SiO2 was described. Synthesized materials act as robust
and green heterogeneous catalysts for the synthesis of some form-
amidine derivatives. Characterizations of -Fe2O3@SiO2–HA]
[c
Brønsted acids were done using several spectroscopic techniques
such as FT-IR, SEM–EDX, XRD and VSM analyses. In all the cases,
no impurities were detected. The magnetic supported acids show
high activities in synthesis of formamidines. Evaluation of various
supported acids represent that
c-Fe2O3@SiO2–HBF4 has the best
[24] A.B. Alloum, K. Bougrin, M. Soufiaoui, Tetrahedron Lett. 44 (2003) 5935–5937.
[25] P. Gogi, D. Konwar, Tetrahedron Lett. 47 (2006) 79–82.
[26] T. Itoh, K. Nagata, H. Ishikawa, A. Ohsawa, Heterocycles 62 (2004) 197–201.
[27] R. Trivedi, S.K. De, R.A. Gibbs, J. Mol. Catal. A 245 (2006) 8–11.
[28] R.N. Nadaf, S.A. Siddiqui, T. Daniel, R.J. Lahoti, K.V. Srinivasan, J. Mol. Catal. A
214 (2004) 155–160.
catalytic activity, having high superparamagnetic property as well
as good turnover number. It seems that the activities are inversely
related to the catalyst acidity (HBF4 > HClO4 > H3PO4 > H3P-
W12O40). HBF4 supported catalyst having weakest acidity showed
[29] H. Wang, R.E. Partch, Y. Li, J. Org. Chem. 62 (1997) 5222–5225.
[30] K. Tanabe, W.F. Hoelderich, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 181 (1999) 399.
[31] J.N. Armor, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 222 (2001) 407.
[32] P.A. Grieco, Organic synthesis, in: Water (Ed.), Blackie Academic and
Professional, Glasgow, Scotland, 1998.
[33] T. Okuhara, Chem. Rev. 102 (2002) 3641–3666.
[34] J.H. Clark, Catalysis of Organic Reactions using Supported Inorganic Reagents,
VCH, New York, 1994.
[35] J.H. Clark (Ed.), Chemistry of Waste Minimization, Chapman and Hall, London,
1995.
[36] A.-H. Lu, E.-L. Salabas, F. Scheuth, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (2007) 1222–1244.
[37] Y. Gao, in: C.S. Kumar (Ed.), Biofunctionalization of Magnetic Nanoparticles
Biofunctionalization of Nanomaterials, vol. 1, Wiley-VCH, Winheim, 2005, pp.
72–98.
[38] G. Schmid, Nanoparticles from Theory to Application, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2004. p. 434.
[39] R.A. Lee, D.S. Donald, Tetrahedron Lett. 38 (1997) 3857.
[40] D. Bogdal, M. Lukasiewicz, J. Pielichowski, A. Miciak, S. Bendnarz, Tetrahedron
59 (2003) 649.
the best activity for this reaction. We think that the stronger acids
can suppress the amine (nucleophile) more easily and therefore
the mild acid catalyst HBF4 shows better catalytic activity. Immo-
bilization of Brønsted acids on magnetic silica surface eliminated
the requirement for tedious catalyst separation procedures such
as filtration and centrifugation which caused time, money and cat-
alyst loss. Beside aforementioned factors, clean separation of cata-
lyst is important to ‘‘green chemistry’’. Recyclable and easily
separable
c-Fe2O3@SiO2–HBF4 catalyst is appropriate for most
formamidine derivatives due to easy work-up and excellent purity
of products. In addition, the method is extendable for diamines
such as orthophenylenediamine and 1,8-naphtalenediamine and
mixtures of amines. The procedure is economically and environ-
mentally a favorable method for the synthesis of formamidine
derivatives.
[41] S. Laurent, D. Forge, M. Port, A. Roch, C. Robic, L. Vander Elst, R.N. Muller, Chem.
Rev. 108 (2008) 2064.
[42] Y. Xu, A. Karmakar, D. Wang, M.W. Mahmood, F. Watanabe, Y. Zhang, A. Fejleh,
P. Fejleh, Z. Li, G. Kannarpady, S. Ali, A.R. Biris, A.S. Biris, J. Phys. Chem. C 114
(2010) 5020–5026.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
[43] L. Ma’mani, A. Heydari, M. Sheykhan, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 384 (2010) 122–127.
[44] S. Krackl, S. Inoue, M. Driess, S. Enthaler, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011 (2011)
2103–2111.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
[45] L.J. Han, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E: Struct. Rep. Online 67 (2011) m514.