GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF WING SIZE AND SHAPE 151
K. V. 1998. Statistical Shape
DRYDEN
, I. L. AND MARDIA,
shape is a simple additive character, then it may prove
useful for the study of morphological variation. For
example, once QTL intervals have been identi®ed,
candidate loci could be screened using complementation
tests. However, in traits showing signi®cant amounts of
interaction and/or dominance, results can be ambiguous
despite attempts to control for dierent genetic back-
grounds by prior backcrossing (Gurganus et al., 1999).
Where the eects of natural variation are entirely
additive, complementation testing may be considerably
easier.
Analysis. Wiley, Chichester.
D. S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Longman, London.
FALCONER
,
FENSTER, C. B., GALLOWAY, L. F. AND CHAO, L. 1997. Epistasis
and its consequences for the evolution of natural popula-
tions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 12, 282±286.
4
FOWLER
, K. AND WHITLOCK, M. C. 1999. The distribution
of phenotypic variance with inbreeding. Evolution, 53,
1143±1156.
GIBSON
,
genetics: a stabilizing theory. Bioessays, 22, 372±380.
G. AND WAGNER
,
G. 2000. Canalization in evolutionary
GILCHRIST
GINS
, A. S., AZEVEDO, R. B. R., PARTRIDGE, L. AND O'HIG-
P. 2000. Adaptation and constraint in the evolution
,
of Drosophila melanogaster wing shape. Evol. Dev., 2,
Acknowledgements
114±124.
GILCHRIST
We thank Giselle Geddes for invaluable technical
assistance. This work was supported the Natural Envi-
ronment Research Council (UK).
, A. S. AND PARTRIDGE, L. 1999. A comparison of
the genetic basis of wing size divergence in three parallel
body size clines of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 153,
1775±1787.
GRODNITSKY
,
The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
D. L. 1999. Form and Function of Insect Wings.
References
ALONSO
, A. AND MUNOZ, A. 1984. Biometric characterization
GURGANUS, M. C., NUZHDIN, S. V., LEIPS, J. W. AND MACKAY, T. F.
of some wing measurement in Drosophila melanogaster.
Drosoph. Inf. Serv., 60, 47±48.
C. 1999. High-resolution mapping of quantitative trait loci
for sternopleural bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster.
Genetics, 152, 1585±1604.
BAYLAC
, M. AND PENIN, X. 1998. Wing static allometry in
Drosophila simulans males (Diptera, Drosophilidae) and its
relationships with developmental compartments. Acta zool.
Hung., 44, 97±112.
HAAS, H. L. AND TOLLEY, K. A. 1998. Geographic variation of
wing morphology in three Eurasian populations of the fruit
¯y, Drosophila lummei. J. Zool., 245, 197±203.
, R. B., GILCHRIST, G. W., CARLSON, M. L., BERRIGAN, D. AND
BITNER-MATHE, B. C. AND KLACZKO, L. B. 1999. Size and shape
HUEY
heritability in natural populations of Drosophila mediopunc-
tata: temporal and microgeographical variation. Genetica,
105, 35±42.
SERRA
,
L. 2000. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size
in an introduced ¯y. Science 287, 308±309.
IMASHEVA, A. G., BUBLI, O. A., LAZEBNY, O. E. AND ZHIVOTOVSKY,
L. A. 1995. Geographic dierentiation in wing shape in
BITNER-MATHE, B. C., PEIXOTO, A. A. AND KLACZKO, L. B. 1995.
Morphological variation in a natural population of Dro-
sophila mediopunctata: altitudinal cline, temporal changes
and in¯uence of chromosome inversions. Heredity, 75, 54±61.
Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica, 96, 303±306.
JAMES, A. C., AZEVEDO, R. B. R. AND PARTRIDGE, L. 1995. Cellular
basis and developmental timing in a size cline of Drosophila
melanogaster. Genetics, 140, 659±666.
BREESE
, E. L. AND MATHER, K. 1960. The organization of
polygenic activity within a chromosome in Drosophila.
Heredity, 14, 375±399.
JINKS, J. L. 1979. The biometrical approach to quantitative
variation. In: Thompson, J. N. and Thoday, J. M. (eds)
Quantitative Genetic Variation, Vol. 3c, pp. 81±109.
Academic Press, New York.
BUBLII
, O. A., IMASHEVA, A. G. AND LAZEBNY, O. E. 1996.
Variation of a set of wing characters in natural populations
of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetika, 32, 1513±1520.
, S., GIORGI, G., NATALI, V. AND GUERRA, D. 1991.
KEARSEY, M. J. 1980. The eciency of the North Carolina
experiment III and sel®ng, backcrossing series for estimating
CAVICCHI
Temperature-related divergence in experimental populations
of Drosophila melanogaster III. Fourier and centroid ana-
lysis of wing shape and relationship between shape variation
and ®tness. J. Evol. Biol., 4, 141±159.
additive and dominance variation. Heredity, 45, 73±82.
, M. J. AND BARNES, B. W. 1970. Variation for
3
KEARSEY
metrical characters in Drosophila populations. Heredity,
25, 11±21.
CAVICCHI, S., GUERRA, D., NATALI, V., PEZZOLI, C. AND GIORGI,
KEARSEY
, M. J. AND JINKS, J. L. 1968. A general method of
detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for
G. 1989. Temperature-related divergence in experimental
populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Correlation
between ®tness and body dimensions. J. evol. Biol., 2,
235±251.
metrical traits. I. Theory. Heredity, 23, 403±409.
KEARSEY, M. J. AND KOJIMA, K. 1967. The genetic architecture of
body weight and egg hatchability in Drosophila melanogas-
ter. Genetics, 56, 23±37.
COYNE
, J. A. AND BEECHAM, E. 1987. Heritability of two
morphological characters within and among natural- pop-
KEARSEY
,
M. J. AND POONI
,
H. S. 1996. The Genetical Analysis of
Quantitative Traits. Chapman & Hall, London.
M. H. 1998. The control of wing
ulations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 117, 727±737.
CRNOKRAK
, P. AND ROFF, D. A. 1995. Dominance variance:
associations with selection and ®tness. Heredity, 75,
530±540.
LEHMANN, F. O. AND DICKINSON,
kinematics and ¯ight forces in fruit ¯ies (Drosophila spp.).
J. Exp. Biol., 201, 385±401.
Ó The Genetics Society of Great Britain, Heredity, 86, 144±152.